Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms is a research topic within Hematology. Science Explorer counts 40k research works in it since 1950. 17.6% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on thrombosis, coagulation disorders, and their association with various conditions such as pregnancy, inflammation, and pediatric stroke. It covers topics related to thrombin signaling, protease-activated receptors, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and the role of coagulation factors in different pathological conditions.
- Thrombin
- Protease-Activated Receptors
- Coagulation
- Thrombophilia
- Pregnancy
- Inflammation
- Pediatric Stroke
- Factor V Leiden
- Antithrombotic Therapy
- Hemostasis
- Research works
- 40k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 7.1k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 17.6% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -6% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (928 and 518 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 928 works
- 2 China 518 works
- 3 Japan 185 works
- 4 India 165 works
- 5 Germany 146 works
- 6 Italy 146 works
- 7 France 143 works
- 8 United Kingdom 138 works
- 9 Canada 118 works
- 10 Spain 107 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms research?
By volume in 2022–2025, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill publishes the most Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms research, followed by Inserm and Nara Medical University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 26 works
- 2 InsermFrance 16 works
- 3 Nara Medical UniversityJapan 13 works
- 4 Medical University of ViennaAustria 13 works
- 5 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 13 works
- 6 Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaUnited States 13 works
- 7 Leiden University Medical CenterNetherlands 12 works
- 8 McMaster UniversityCanada 12 works
- 9 University of MichiganUnited States 12 works
- 10 Capital Medical UniversityChina 11 works
Who are the leading researchers in Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms include Valentı́n Fuster, Yoshihiro Kokubo and Mark T. Mackay.
- 1 Valentı́n Fuster United States 5.4k citations
- 2 Yoshihiro Kokubo Japan 4.5k citations
- 3 Mark T. Mackay Australia 4.1k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms research done?
The largest centres of Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Paris (France), Moscow (Russia) and London (United Kingdom). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Hamilton.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- HamiltonCA · 20.9 works8.8×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms?
Among universities, judged by research, Medical University of Vienna, McMaster University and Maastricht University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Medical University of ViennaAustria | 66.9 | 27.4% | 11.0× | 13 | -40.6% |
| 2 | McMaster UniversityCanada | 57.2 | 30.1% | 6.0× | 12 | -24.5% |
| 3 | Maastricht UniversityNetherlands | 54.9 | 26.3% | 6.9× | 9 | -14.3% |
| 4 | Nara Medical UniversityJapan | 54.7 | 20.4% | 52.4× | 13 | -3.2% |
| 5 | University of PaduaItaly | 44.8 | 30.2% | 3.1× | 9 | -12.1% |
| 6 | Harvard UniversityUnited States | 42.0 | 27.3% | 2.2× | 10 | -18.1% |
| 7 | University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States | 38.6 | 12.3% | 4.1× | 26 | -13.1% |
| 8 | Capital Medical UniversityChina | 35.1 | 16.4% | 5.3× | 12 | +1.1% |
| 9 | Sichuan UniversityChina | 33.6 | 25.8% | 1.7× | 11 | -12.6% |
| 10 | Johns Hopkins UniversityUnited States | 33.2 | 22.7% | 2.3× | 9 | +2.6% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 6% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2009.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.