Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · History

Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory

Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory is a research topic within History. Science Explorer counts 4.5k research works in it since 1950. 29.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the historical ecology of Amazonian landscapes, focusing on pre-Columbian human impact, plant domestication, landscape management, and the formation of anthropogenic soils. It investigates the long-term interactions between human cultures and the Amazonian environment, highlighting the influence of indigenous practices on forest composition, agrobiodiversity, and cultural landscapes.

  • Amazonia
  • historical ecology
  • pre-Columbian
  • landscape management
  • anthropogenic soils
  • plant domestication
  • cultural landscapes
  • forest composition
  • agrobiodiversity
  • indigenous practices
Research works
4.5k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.3k
per year above
Top-10% rate
29.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+31%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory research?

By volume, Brazil and the United States publish the most (569 and 110 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Brazil 569 works
  2. 2 United States 110 works
  3. 3 Argentina 49 works
  4. 4 France 49 works
  5. 5 Portugal 34 works
  6. 6 United Kingdom 26 works
  7. 7 Spain 24 works
  8. 8 Germany 22 works
  9. 9 Mexico 16 works
  10. 10 Australia 13 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Brazil: 62.5%United States: 12.0%Argentina: 5.4%France: 5.3%6 others listed: 14.8%62%largest
Brazil569 · 62.5%United States110 · 12.0%Argentina49 · 5.4%France49 · 5.3%6 others listed135 · 14.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidade de São Paulo publishes the most Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory research, followed by Universidade Federal do Pará and Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Who are the leading researchers in Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory include Georg Guggenberger.

  1. 1 Georg Guggenberger Germany 1.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory research done?

The largest centres of Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory research in 2022–2025 are São Paulo (Brazil), Belém (Brazil), Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) and Manaus (Brazil). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Manaus and Belém.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 São Paulo Brazil 73 works
  2. 2 Belém Brazil 52 works
  3. 3 Rio de Janeiro Brazil 49 works
  4. 4 Manaus Brazil 32 works
  5. 5 Recife Brazil 24 works
  6. 6 Lisbon Portugal 23 works
  7. 7 Buenos Aires Argentina 22 works
  8. 8 Brasília Brazil 21 works
  9. 9 Belo Horizonte Brazil 20 works
  10. 10 Paris France 20 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. ManausBR · 32.2 works72×
  2. BelémBR · 52.0 works71×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory than the world average.

See Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory on the map

Where is the best place to study Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory?

Among universities, judged by research, Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará and Universidade Federal do Pará score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 23.89%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universidade de São Paulo: 32, 32.2%Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará: 12, 35.5%Universidade Federal do Pará: 32, 25.5%Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro: 21, 27.9%Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP): 13, 24.0%Universidade Federal do Maranhão: 10, 27.3%Universidade Federal de Pernambuco: 16, 15.5%Universidade Federal do Amazonas: 18, 19.3%Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais: 16, 17.8%Universidade Federal do Piauí: 10, 13.9%Universidade Federal…Universidade de São …Universidade Federal…Universidade Federal…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universidade de São PauloBrazil 48.932.2%19.0×32 +64.8%
2 Universidade Federal do Oeste do ParáBrazil 37.235.5%232.4×12 +105.5%
3 Universidade Federal do ParáBrazil 36.325.5%81.1×32 +57.9%
4 Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroBrazil 34.727.9%27.6×21 +75.0%
5 Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Brazil 34.724.0%17.1×13 +219.1%
6 Universidade Federal do MaranhãoBrazil 31.027.3%52.6×10 +361.0%
7 Universidade Federal de PernambucoBrazil 26.715.5%31.9×16 +226.3%
8 Universidade Federal do AmazonasBrazil 24.519.3%84.5×18 +107.6%
9 Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrazil 24.317.8%22.3×16 +117.4%
10 Universidade Federal do PiauíBrazil 18.113.9%49.3×10 +636.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 31% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.