Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Analytical Chemistry

Analytical chemistry methods development

Analytical chemistry methods development is a research topic within Analytical Chemistry. Science Explorer counts 68k research works in it since 1950. 21.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers advances in analytical chemistry techniques, with a focus on molecularly imprinted polymers, solid-phase microextraction, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, green analytical chemistry, sample preparation techniques, metal ion-imprinted polymers, carbon nanotubes, ionic liquids, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, and biosensing.

  • Molecularly Imprinted Polymers
  • Solid-Phase Microextraction
  • Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction
  • Green Analytical Chemistry
  • Sample Preparation Techniques
  • Metal Ion-Imprinted Polymers
  • Carbon Nanotubes
  • Ionic Liquids
  • Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry
  • Biosensing
Research works
68k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
15k
per year above
Top-10% rate
21.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
-1%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Analytical chemistry methods development research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (2.7k and 520 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 2.7k works
  2. 2 India 520 works
  3. 3 United States 514 works
  4. 4 Iran 429 works
  5. 5 Türkiye 309 works
  6. 6 Russia 299 works
  7. 7 Brazil 294 works
  8. 8 Spain 247 works
  9. 9 Germany 202 works
  10. 10 Poland 191 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 47.2%India: 9.1%United States: 9.0%Iran: 7.5%6 others listed: 27.1%47%largest
China2,683 · 47.2%India520 · 9.1%United States514 · 9.0%Iran429 · 7.5%6 others listed1,542 · 27.1%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Analytical chemistry methods development research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Chinese Academy of Sciences publishes the most Analytical chemistry methods development research, followed by Jiangsu University and Sichuan University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 47 works
  2. 2 Jiangsu UniversityChina 36 works
  3. 3 Sichuan UniversityChina 34 works
  4. 4 St Petersburg UniversityRussia 28 works
  5. 5 Xiamen UniversityChina 27 works
  6. 6 Universidade de São PauloBrazil 26 works
  7. 7 Tabriz University of Medical SciencesIran 26 works
  8. 8 University of BaghdadIraq 25 works
  9. 9 Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussia 25 works
  10. 10 Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFrance 25 works

Where is Analytical chemistry methods development research done?

The largest centres of Analytical chemistry methods development research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tehran (Iran), Nanjing (China) and Moscow (Russia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Çankaya, Tabriz and Baoding.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 450 works
  2. 2 Tehran Iran 149 works
  3. 3 Nanjing China 122 works
  4. 4 Moscow Russia 119 works
  5. 5 Wuhan China 119 works
  6. 6 Guangzhou China 113 works
  7. 7 Shanghai China 109 works
  8. 8 Hangzhou China 88 works
  9. 9 Chengdu China 84 works
  10. 10 Xi'an China 69 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. ÇankayaTR · 22.7 works91×
  2. TabrizIR · 64.4 works11×
  3. BaodingCN · 38.1 works10×
  4. KayseriTR · 23.2 works9.6×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Analytical chemistry methods development than the world average.

See Analytical chemistry methods development on the map

Where is the best place to study Analytical chemistry methods development?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Mazandaran, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Gdańsk University of Technology score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 28.39%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Mazandaran: 12, 44.2%Tabriz University of Medical Sciences: 26, 15.6%Gdańsk University of Technology: 18, 34.6%Shahid Beheshti University: 21, 30.1%Erciyes University: 23, 28.2%Mansoura University: 24, 33.1%Shenyang Pharmaceutical University: 14, 23.6%Hebei Agricultural University: 16, 32.3%Near East University: 19, 11.2%Jiangsu University: 36, 31.0%University of Mazand…Gdańsk University of…Shahid Beheshti Univ…Tabriz University of…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of MazandaranIran 68.144.2%19.4×12 +86.0%
2 Tabriz University of Medical SciencesIran 65.015.6%14.1×26 +184.5%
3 Gdańsk University of TechnologyPoland 64.734.6%14.4×18 +7.5%
4 Shahid Beheshti UniversityIran 59.830.1%11.1×21 -19.8%
5 Erciyes UniversityTürkiye 59.228.2%13.6×23 -3.3%
6 Mansoura UniversityEgypt 58.733.1%6.6×24 +19.4%
7 Shenyang Pharmaceutical UniversityChina 57.423.6%12.9×14 +139.6%
8 Hebei Agricultural UniversityChina 56.032.3%15.3×16 -20.5%
9 Near East UniversityCyprus 55.511.2%17.1×19 —
10 Jiangsu UniversityChina 54.931.0%5.9×36 -20.2%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Analytical chemistry methods development research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 1% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2013. The fastest-growing topics are Analytical chemistry methods development.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.