Chromatography in Natural Products
Chromatography in Natural Products is a research topic within Analytical Chemistry. Science Explorer counts 20k research works in it since 1950. 11.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the advances in counter-current chromatography techniques, particularly in the isolation and purification of bioactive compounds from Nelumbo nucifera and other natural sources. It includes topics such as solvent system selection, phytochemical profiling, antioxidant activity, and high-speed counter-current chromatography for plant analysis.
- Counter-Current Chromatography
- Natural Product Isolation
- Nelumbo Nucifera
- High-Speed Counter-Current Chromatography
- Plant Analysis
- Solvent System Selection
- Phytochemical Profile
- Antioxidant Activity
- Bioactive Compounds
- Chromatographic Separation
- Research works
- 20k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 2.4k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 11.8% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -32% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Chromatography in Natural Products research?
By volume, China and India publish the most (786 and 213 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 China 786 works
- 2 India 213 works
- 3 United States 111 works
- 4 Russia 89 works
- 5 Germany 51 works
- 6 Poland 37 works
- 7 Japan 37 works
- 8 South Korea 37 works
- 9 Indonesia 35 works
- 10 France 34 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Chromatography in Natural Products research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine publishes the most Chromatography in Natural Products research, followed by Chinese Academy of Sciences and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 20 works
- 2 Chinese Academy of SciencesChina 16 works
- 3 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 15 works
- 4 Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina 14 works
- 5 Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 12 works
- 6 China Pharmaceutical UniversityChina 9 works
- 7 Zhejiang University of TechnologyChina 9 works
- 8 Beijing University of Chinese MedicineChina 9 works
- 9 Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 8 works
- 10 Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 8 works
Who are the leading researchers in Chromatography in Natural Products?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Chromatography in Natural Products include Mietek Jaroniec and Robert Verpoorte.
- 1 Mietek Jaroniec United States 2.4k citations
- 2 Robert Verpoorte Netherlands 1.9k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Chromatography in Natural Products research done?
The largest centres of Chromatography in Natural Products research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Hangzhou (China), Nanjing (China) and Shanghai (China).
Where is the best place to study Chromatography in Natural Products?
Among universities, judged by research, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina | 64.9 | 20.9% | 106.2× | 20 | -32.9% |
| 2 | Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina | 63.0 | 40.6% | 30.0× | 12 | -75.2% |
| 3 | Beijing University of Chinese MedicineChina | 56.6 | 26.8% | 27.8× | 9 | -25.0% |
| 4 | China Pharmaceutical UniversityChina | 50.1 | 32.5% | 23.5× | 9 | -61.4% |
| 5 | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina | 48.6 | 19.5% | 8.5× | 15 | -46.7% |
| 6 | Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina | 40.7 | 15.5% | 30.1× | 14 | -58.7% |
| 7 | Zhejiang University of TechnologyChina | 39.2 | 12.0% | 9.2× | 9 | -31.7% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Chromatography in Natural Products research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 32% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2012.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.