Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches is a research topic within Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Science Explorer counts 46k research works in it since 1950. 14.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the diagnosis and management of aortic diseases, including aortic dissection, bicuspid aortic valve disease, thoracic aortic aneurysms, and endovascular repair techniques. It covers topics such as risk prediction, surgical outcomes, complications, and long-term survival in patients with various aortic pathologies.
- Aortic Dissection
- Bicuspid Aortic Valve
- Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms
- Endovascular Repair
- Type B Aortic Dissection
- Aortic Aneurysm
- Aortic Root Replacement
- Echocardiography
- Spinal Cord Ischemia
- False Lumen Patency
- Research works
- 46k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 6.8k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 14.9% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +26% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches research?
By volume, the United States and China publish the most (2.2k and 1.2k works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 2.2k works
- 2 China 1.2k works
- 3 Japan 761 works
- 4 Germany 504 works
- 5 Italy 474 works
- 6 United Kingdom 334 works
- 7 France 244 works
- 8 Canada 230 works
- 9 India 226 works
- 10 Spain 209 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College publishes the most Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches research, followed by Cleveland Clinic and Mayo Clinic in Arizona.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 55 works
- 2 Cleveland ClinicUnited States 51 works
- 3 Mayo Clinic in ArizonaUnited States 43 works
- 4 The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonUnited States 35 works
- 5 Yale UniversityUnited States 34 works
- 6 Stanford UniversityUnited States 33 works
- 7 Sichuan UniversityChina 33 works
- 8 Capital Medical UniversityChina 31 works
- 9 Beijing Anzhen HospitalChina 29 works
- 10 University of MichiganUnited States 28 works
Who are the leading researchers in Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches include Winfried März, E. Murat Tuzcu and Deepak L. Bhatt.
- 1 Winfried März Germany 5.2k citations
- 2 E. Murat Tuzcu United States 4.7k citations
- 3 Deepak L. Bhatt United States 4.2k citations
- 4 Stephan Windecker Switzerland 4.2k citations
- 5 Patrizio Lancellotti Belgium 4.1k citations
- 6 Jeroen J. Bax Netherlands 3.9k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches research done?
The largest centres of Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan), London (United Kingdom) and Shanghai (China).
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where is the best place to study Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches?
Among universities, judged by research, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and University of Bern score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The University of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonUnited States | 68.3 | 12.5% | 14.5× | 35 | +231.8% |
| 2 | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina | 56.8 | 14.3% | 6.8× | 54 | +55.9% |
| 3 | University of BernSwitzerland | 53.2 | 35.3% | 3.1× | 11 | +47.9% |
| 4 | University of FreiburgGermany | 51.5 | 18.3% | 4.6× | 14 | +341.0% |
| 5 | Fujian Medical UniversityChina | 51.1 | 16.0% | 7.7× | 22 | +73.7% |
| 6 | Weill Cornell MedicineUnited States | 50.0 | 21.4% | 8.3× | 9 | — |
| 7 | Vita-Salute San Raffaele UniversityItaly | 49.7 | 13.8% | 12.2× | 13 | -16.4% |
| 8 | Capital Medical UniversityChina | 49.4 | 14.6% | 6.4× | 30 | +53.3% |
| 9 | Uppsala UniversitySweden | 48.0 | 27.3% | 2.3× | 10 | +141.0% |
| 10 | Université LavalCanada | 46.4 | 30.5% | 3.4× | 11 | +31.5% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 26% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.