Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques is a research topic within Control and Systems Engineering. Science Explorer counts 31k research works in it since 1950. 23.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on machine fault diagnosis and prognostics using methods such as Empirical Mode Decomposition, wavelet transform, and deep learning. It covers topics like condition monitoring, vibration analysis, and remaining useful life estimation for rotating machinery. The research explores the application of machine learning techniques, neural networks, and signal processing in fault detection and health management of various mechanical systems.
- Empirical Mode Decomposition
- Fault Diagnosis
- Machine Learning
- Condition Monitoring
- Vibration Analysis
- Deep Learning
- Remaining Useful Life Estimation
- Wavelet Transform
- Rotating Machinery
- Neural Networks
- Research works
- 31k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 7.2k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 23.0% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- +86% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques research?
By volume, China and India publish the most (6.5k and 713 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 China 6.5k works
- 2 India 713 works
- 3 United States 427 works
- 4 United Kingdom 225 works
- 5 South Korea 220 works
- 6 Germany 165 works
- 7 Italy 165 works
- 8 France 157 works
- 9 Spain 142 works
- 10 Canada 138 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Xi'an Jiaotong University publishes the most Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques research, followed by Chongqing University and Southwest Jiaotong University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityChina 169 works
- 2 Chongqing UniversityChina 121 works
- 3 Southwest Jiaotong UniversityChina 110 works
- 4 Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChina 107 works
- 5 Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsChina 101 works
- 6 Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityChina 101 works
- 7 Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyChina 100 works
- 8 Beihang UniversityChina 96 works
- 9 North China Electric Power UniversityChina 92 works
- 10 Harbin Institute of TechnologyChina 92 works
Who are the leading researchers in Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques include David L. Donoho, Zidong Wang and Richard G. Baraniuk.
- 1 David L. Donoho United States 4.7k citations
- 2 Zidong Wang United Kingdom 4.4k citations
- 3 Richard G. Baraniuk United States 4.4k citations
- 4 Bhim Singh India 3.3k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques research done?
The largest centres of Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Xi'an (China), Shanghai (China) and Nanjing (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Huddersfield, Qinhuangdao and Ma'anshan City.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- HuddersfieldGB · 20.1 works16×
- QinhuangdaoCN · 63.9 works15×
- Ma'anshan CityCN · 28.3 works14×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques?
Among universities, judged by research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Chongqing University and Southwest Jiaotong University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityChina | 79.4 | 38.4% | 9.9× | 169 | +131.2% |
| 2 | Chongqing UniversityChina | 76.2 | 44.2% | 10.5× | 121 | +51.3% |
| 3 | Southwest Jiaotong UniversityChina | 73.1 | 30.0% | 13.5× | 110 | +160.2% |
| 4 | Yanshan UniversityChina | 72.8 | 51.0% | 17.1× | 61 | +14.0% |
| 5 | Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsChina | 71.6 | 24.7% | 10.7× | 101 | +259.0% |
| 6 | Wenzhou UniversityChina | 71.3 | 37.0% | 12.3× | 28 | +459.1% |
| 7 | Beijing Jiaotong UniversityChina | 69.0 | 29.9% | 12.5× | 81 | +127.7% |
| 8 | Shandong University of Science and TechnologyChina | 65.4 | 23.2% | 9.8× | 51 | +285.7% |
| 9 | University of StrathclydeUnited Kingdom | 65.1 | 49.7% | 6.3× | 18 | +135.1% |
| 10 | Anhui University of TechnologyChina | 64.9 | 27.9% | 14.3× | 28 | +260.3% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 86% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.