Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Plant Science

Shallot Cultivation and Analysis

Shallot Cultivation and Analysis is a research topic within Plant Science. Science Explorer counts 5.9k research works in it since 1970. 2.5% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics related to plant-microbe interactions, agricultural practices, and biotechnological applications. It includes studies on the use of organic fertilizers, phosphate solubilization, shallot farming, soil quality assessment, sustainable crop production, mobile learning, and English teaching. The research also delves into the potential of biological control methods and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education and agriculture.

  • Plant-Microbe Interactions
  • Organic Fertilizers
  • Shallot Farming
  • Phosphate Solubilization
  • Mobile Learning
  • English Teaching
  • Soil Quality
  • Crop Production
  • Sustainable Agriculture
  • Biological Control
Research works
5.9k
fractional, since 1970
In the world top 10%
148
per year above
Top-10% rate
2.5%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+295%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Shallot Cultivation and Analysis research?

By volume, Indonesia and India publish the most (2.5k and 41 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Indonesia 2.5k works
  2. 2 India 41 works
  3. 3 ?? 40 works
  4. 4 United States 22 works
  5. 5 China 21 works
  6. 6 Iraq 15 works
  7. 7 Malaysia 13 works
  8. 8 Philippines 8 works
  9. 9 Ethiopia 7 works
  10. 10 Japan 6 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Indonesia: 93.6%India: 1.5%??: 1.5%United States: 0.8%6 others listed: 2.6%94%largest
Indonesia2,512 · 93.6%India41 · 1.5%??40 · 1.5%United States22 · 0.8%6 others listed70 · 2.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Shallot Cultivation and Analysis research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Tanjungpura University publishes the most Shallot Cultivation and Analysis research, followed by University of Mataram and University of Brawijaya.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Tanjungpura UniversityIndonesia 87 works
  2. 2 University of MataramIndonesia 73 works
  3. 3 University of BrawijayaIndonesia 72 works
  4. 4 IPB UniversityIndonesia 71 works
  5. 5 Universitas JemberIndonesia 66 works
  6. 6 University of Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa TimurIndonesia 54 works
  7. 7 Lampung UniversityIndonesia 50 works
  8. 8 Universitas Syiah KualaIndonesia 45 works
  9. 9 Universitas Sumatera UtaraIndonesia 40 works
  10. 10 Universitas Halu OleoIndonesia 40 works

Where is Shallot Cultivation and Analysis research done?

The largest centres of Shallot Cultivation and Analysis research in 2022–2025 are Jakarta (Indonesia), Medan (Indonesia), Malang (Indonesia) and Pontianak (Indonesia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Sleman, Pontianak and Palu.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Jakarta Indonesia 145 works
  2. 2 Medan Indonesia 138 works
  3. 3 Malang Indonesia 112 works
  4. 4 Pontianak Indonesia 103 works
  5. 5 Bogor Indonesia 91 works
  6. 6 Jember Indonesia 87 works
  7. 7 Makassar Indonesia 86 works
  8. 8 Mataram Indonesia 84 works
  9. 9 Surabaya Indonesia 83 works
  10. 10 Yogyakarta Indonesia 82 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. SlemanID · 50.1 works51×
  2. PontianakID · 103.2 works50×
  3. PaluID · 41.1 works44×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Shallot Cultivation and Analysis than the world average.

See Shallot Cultivation and Analysis on the map

Where is the best place to study Shallot Cultivation and Analysis?

Among universities, judged by research, IPB University, Sebelas Maret University and University of Brawijaya score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%2.5%5%7.5%mean 2.59%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →IPB University: 70, 4.7%Sebelas Maret University: 33, 6.0%University of Brawijaya: 72, 0.8%University of Mataram: 73, 3.2%Padjadjaran University: 38, 1.3%Universitas Syiah Kuala: 45, 0.7%Universitas Gadjah Mada: 33, 0.5%Malikussaleh University: 14, 6.9%Universitas Halu Oleo: 40, 0.8%Jambi University: 34, 1.0%Sebelas Maret Univer…IPB UniversityUniversity of MataramUniversity of Brawij…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 IPB UniversityIndonesia 76.14.7%47.6×70 +658.3%
2 Sebelas Maret UniversityIndonesia 72.36.0%13.5×33 +605.0%
3 University of BrawijayaIndonesia 63.30.8%31.4×72 +314.3%
4 University of MataramIndonesia 60.23.2%34.1×73 —
5 Padjadjaran UniversityIndonesia 59.71.3%17.4×38 +1426.9%
6 Universitas Syiah KualaIndonesia 59.20.7%40.3×45 +231.0%
7 Universitas Gadjah MadaIndonesia 58.00.5%13.9×33 +491.2%
8 Malikussaleh UniversityIndonesia 58.06.9%20.6×14 —
9 Universitas Halu OleoIndonesia 56.70.8%45.8×40 +305.6%
10 Jambi UniversityIndonesia 56.01.0%19.0×34 +366.7%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Shallot Cultivation and Analysis research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 295% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Shallot Cultivation and Analysis.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.