Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Compare · Countries

Malawi vs Montenegro

On research quality in 2022-now, Malawi ranks #61 in the world and Montenegro #63, of 189 countries. Malawi stands higher in 3 of the 6 fields both publish in, Montenegro in 3.

Research profiles alike: 0.19somewhat alike shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured

Compare other countries
vs

Malawi

World rank, 2022-now
#61
#55 all time
Works, 2022-now
3k
fractional
Top-10% rate
9.5%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
63%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Forestry, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Parasitology.

Montenegro

World rank, 2022-now
#63
#62 all time
Works, 2022-now
2.8k
fractional
Top-10% rate
8.4%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
56%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, General Energy, Space and Planetary Science.

Who leads, measure by measure?

Malawi leads on 8 of 9 measures: research quality, excellence for its fields, output, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access, international co-authorship and growth. Montenegro leads on none. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.

Malawi 81 level0 Montenegro
  1. #61Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#63
  2. 1.12×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.99×
  3. 3kOutputfractional works, 2022-now2.8k
  4. 9.5%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited8.4%
  5. 16.6Citations per workall time, per fractional work8.7
  6. 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
  7. 63%Open accessof its works free to read, all time56%
  8. 49%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time46%
  9. +46%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+17%

A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.

Who leads in each field?

Malawi stands higher in 3 of 6 fields, Montenegro in 3. Malawi leads most in Medicine (#45 against #70); Montenegro leads most in Environmental Science (#59 against #72). Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.

Malawi 33 Montenegro
  1. #51Agricultural and Biological Sciences-
  2. -Computer Science#56
  3. -Engineering#58
  4. #72Environmental Science#59
  5. #45Medicine#70
  6. #65Social Sciences#85

Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.

The numbers behind each field

Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.

Field Malawi rankMontenegro rank Malawi top 10%Montenegro top 10% Malawi worksMontenegro works
Agricultural and Biological Sciences #51 - 11.7% - 336 -
Computer Science - #56 - 9.1% - 249
Engineering - #58 - 7.4% - 465
Environmental Science #72 #59 7.4% 9.6% 275 201
Medicine #45 #70 11.8% 7.3% 641 332
Social Sciences #65 #85 8.2% 6.2% 534 303

What is each known for?

The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.

Malawi

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology245▲ 1.73×119 topics
  2. Climate Change202▲ 2.1×103 topics
  3. Sustainability141▲ 1.62×81 topics
  4. Globalization99▲ 1.41×86 topics
  5. Environmental Impact98▲ 1.61×51 topics
  6. Maternal Mortality91▲ 11×5 topics
  7. Sustainable Agriculture88▲ 8.0×13 topics
  8. Community Health Workers87▲ 28×2 topics
  9. Antiretroviral Therapy80▲ 14×6 topics
  10. Health Inequalities76▲ 18×4 topics
  11. Socio-economic Factors75▲ 19×2 topics
  12. Biodiversity74▲ 2.8×32 topics
  13. Child Mortality74▲ 29×1 topic
  14. Health Systems74▲ 29×1 topic
  15. Smallholder Farmers73▲ 9.8×6 topics
  16. Child Development72▲ 5.0×8 topics
  17. Social Networks70▲ 7.2×9 topics
  18. Food Security65▲ 3.4×20 topics
  19. Biodiversity Conservation65▲ 4.8×16 topics
  20. Rural Development64▲ 5.3×15 topics
  21. Global Burden62▲ 3.2×12 topics
  22. Poverty Reduction62▲ 13×5 topics
  23. Vaccine60▲ 4.2×11 topics
  24. Colonialism58▲ 3.5×17 topics
  25. Genetic Diversity58▲ 3.8×20 topics
  26. Global Burden of Disease57▲ 6.5×4 topics
  27. Mortality Rates53▲ 16×2 topics
  28. Technology Adoption53▲ 8.0×6 topics
  29. Maternal and Child Undernutrition52▲ 18×1 topic
  30. Water Sanitation Hygiene52▲ 18×1 topic
  31. HIV Transmission51▲ 19×2 topics
  32. Gender Inequality48▲ 9.7×6 topics
  33. Viral Load47▲ 17×2 topics
  34. Vulnerability47▲ 5.7×8 topics
  35. Agricultural Innovation44▲ 27×3 topics
  36. Preexposure Prophylaxis44▲ 26×1 topic
  37. Stigma and Discrimination44▲ 26×1 topic
  38. Livelihood Diversification44▲ 39×1 topic
  39. Market Participation44▲ 39×1 topic
  40. Global Health42▲ 7.6×6 topics

Montenegro

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change171▲ 1.89×101 topics
  2. Deep Learning158▲ 1.38×79 topics
  3. Machine Learning119◆ 1.07×80 topics
  4. Sustainability106▲ 1.31×95 topics
  5. Sustainable Development87▲ 1.68×61 topics
  6. Renewable Energy80▲ 1.67×47 topics
  7. Neural Networks78▲ 1.53×40 topics
  8. Economic Growth77▲ 2.9×26 topics
  9. Environmental Impact74▲ 1.31×57 topics
  10. Biodiversity66▲ 2.6×31 topics
  11. Remote Sensing59▲ 1.46×36 topics
  12. Identity54▲ 2.2×37 topics
  13. Biogeography51▲ 5.5×20 topics
  14. Religion46▲ 3.0×24 topics
  15. Invasive Species46▲ 3.2×21 topics
  16. Nationalism43▲ 2.9×18 topics
  17. International Relations43▲ 5.3×18 topics
  18. Regional Development39▲ 3.4×14 topics
  19. Ethnicity39▲ 3.1×14 topics
  20. Sovereign Debt Crises38▲ 29×2 topics
  21. Nation-Building38▲ 22×4 topics
  22. International Trade38▲ 8.1×10 topics
  23. Foreign Policy38▲ 30×2 topics
  24. Agricultural Sustainability35▲ 9.2×5 topics
  25. Taxonomy34▲ 7.1×13 topics
  26. Negotiation34▲ 29×2 topics
  27. Phylogeny33▲ 6.0×16 topics
  28. Commercial Diplomacy33▲ 84×1 topic
  29. Ecology33▲ 5.8×9 topics
  30. Economic Diplomacy33▲ 84×1 topic
  31. Innovation Management33▲ 6.4×7 topics
  32. Conflict31▲ 5.8×7 topics
  33. Balkans31▲ 40×2 topics
  34. Small and Medium Enterprises29▲ 4.9×4 topics
  35. Leadership Emergence28▲ 61×1 topic
  36. Rural Tourism28▲ 27×1 topic
  37. Mediterranean27▲ 9.2×6 topics
  38. Eastern Europe27▲ 15×2 topics
  39. Post-war26▲ 68×1 topic
  40. Yugoslavia26▲ 68×1 topic

Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.

How has their output grown?

Montenegro has out-published Malawi every year since 2025, when it overtook it.

still counting5001kMontenegro998 in 2025Malawi971 in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works per year.

Their share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.

still counting0.010%0.020%Montenegro0.017% in 2025Malawi0.017% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).

still counting5%10%15%Malawi10.2% in 2025Montenegro9.5% in 2025200020102020

A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.

Who holds more of the world's best institutions?

A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.

Malawi 05 level0 Montenegro
  1. 0In the world top 500
  2. 0In the top 1000
  3. 0In the top 5000
  4. 0In the top 1,0000
  5. #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51

Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.

Which publishes more research, Malawi or Montenegro?

Malawi publishes 1.1× as much research as Montenegro in 2022-now (3k against 2.8k fractional works).

Whose research has more impact, Malawi or Montenegro?

9.5% of Malawi's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 8.4% for Montenegro.

Is Malawi or Montenegro growing faster?

Output in 2022-25 was +46% against 2018-21 for Malawi, and +17% for Montenegro.

Which has more open access research, Malawi or Montenegro?

63% of Malawi's research is free to read, against 56% of Montenegro's.

Which has more world-class institutions, Malawi or Montenegro?

Malawi holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Montenegro 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 0.

Which institutions lead in each country?

The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.

Malawi

  1. 1University of Malawi9.1% top 10% · 650 works
  2. 2Kamuzu Central Hospital12.3% top 10% · 279 works
  3. 3Ministry of Education Science and Technology7.7% top 10% · 312 works
  4. 4Mzuzu University6.9% top 10% · 241 works
  5. 5Malawi University of Science and Technology6.9% top 10% · 172 works
  6. 6Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources11.0% top 10% · 243 works

Montenegro

  1. 1Ministry of Education14.6% top 10% · 468 works
  2. 2University of Montenegro6.7% top 10% · 1.4k works
  3. 3Mediterranean University7.6% top 10% · 395 works
  4. 4University of Donja Gorica8.1% top 10% · 147 works
  5. 5Ministry of Science11.0% top 10% · 110 works
  6. 6Klinički Centar Crne Gore3.1% top 10% · 67 works

The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.

Who are the top researchers on each side?

The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.

Malawi

  1. 1 Amelia Catharine Crampin #138,780 worldwide 23k citations · 372 works
  2. 2 Kelias Phiri Msyamboza #162,077 worldwide 12k citations · 53 works
  3. 3 Eduard E. Zijlstra #238,180 worldwide 4.8k citations · 91 works
  4. 4 Elsbeth Robson #239,786 worldwide 3k citations · 121 works
  5. 5 Felix Khuluza #244,579 worldwide 1.6k citations · 40 works

Montenegro

  1. 1 Nebojša Bulatović #261,816 worldwide 17k citations · 42 works
  2. 2 T. Ravdandorj #265,252 worldwide 5k citations · 92 works
  3. 3 K. B. Cantun Avila #321,930 worldwide 4.7k citations · 86 works
  4. 4 Aneta Bošković #366,061 worldwide 32k citations · 41 works
  5. 5 B. Tseepeldorj #384,755 worldwide 4k citations · 68 works