China Agricultural University vs King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
On research quality in 2022–now, China Agricultural University ranks #106 in the world and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology #109, of 28,054 institutions. China Agricultural University stands higher in 7 of the 14 fields both publish in, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in 7.
Research profiles alike: 0.40similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
China Agricultural University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #106
- #540 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 11k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 35.5%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 38%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Soil Science.
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
- World rank, 2022–now
- #109
- #309 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 5.7k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 28.3%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 48%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Process Chemistry and Technology, Chemical Engineering.
Who leads in each field?
China Agricultural University stands higher in 7 of 14 fields, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in 7. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #2Agricultural and Biological Sciences#611
- #35Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#290
- #299Business, Management and Accounting—
- —Chemical Engineering#49
- —Chemistry#59
- —Computer Science#131
- #95Earth and Planetary Sciences#142
- #239Economics, Econometrics and Finance—
- —Energy#129
- #298Engineering#66
- #14Environmental Science#100
- —Materials Science#66
- #375Medicine—
- —Physics and Astronomy#158
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Veterinary3.7× 0.0×
- Nursing4.4× 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.4× 0.0×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences6.5× 0.6×
- Dentistry0.1× 0.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology1.4× 0.2×
- Social Sciences0.2× 0.0×
- Medicine0.4× 0.1×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.2× 0.4×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.7× 1.0×
- Psychology0.1× 0.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.6× 0.3×
- Health Professions0.1× 0.0×
- Environmental Science2.3× 1.9×
- Neuroscience0.6× 0.6×
- Arts and Humanities0.0× 0.1×
- Decision Sciences0.4× 0.5×
- Chemistry1.7× 2.8×
- Engineering0.8× 2.4×
- Computer Science0.5× 1.3×
- Materials Science0.8× 2.8×
- Energy0.8× 3.2×
- Mathematics0.3× 1.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.8× 3.6×
- Physics and Astronomy0.2× 1.6×
- Chemical Engineering0.9× 9.4×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where China Agricultural University leans further are at the top, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, China Agricultural University or King Abdullah University of Science and Technology?
China Agricultural University publishes 2.0× as much research as King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in 2022–now (11k against 5.7k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, China Agricultural University or King Abdullah University of Science and Technology?
35.5% of China Agricultural University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 28.3% for King Abdullah University of Science and Technology.