East China Normal University vs King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
On research quality in 2022–now, East China Normal University ranks #107 in the world and King Abdullah University of Science and Technology #109, of 28,054 institutions. East China Normal University stands higher in 9 of the 14 fields both publish in, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in 5.
Research profiles alike: 0.71very similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
East China Normal University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #107
- #377 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 10k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 25.9%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 23%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Process Chemistry and Technology, Software.
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
- World rank, 2022–now
- #109
- #309 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 5.7k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 28.3%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 48%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Process Chemistry and Technology, Chemical Engineering.
Who leads in each field?
East China Normal University stands higher in 9 of 14 fields, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in 5. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- —Agricultural and Biological Sciences#611
- #250Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#290
- —Chemical Engineering#49
- #35Chemistry#59
- #116Computer Science#131
- #115Earth and Planetary Sciences#142
- #156Economics, Econometrics and Finance—
- —Energy#129
- #236Engineering#66
- #83Environmental Science#100
- #130Materials Science#66
- #149Physics and Astronomy#158
- #176Psychology—
- #193Social Sciences—
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Psychology1.7× 0.0×
- Social Sciences0.8× 0.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.5× 0.0×
- Arts and Humanities0.6× 0.1×
- Health Professions0.3× 0.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.9× 0.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.7× 0.2×
- Decision Sciences1.3× 0.5×
- Neuroscience1.5× 0.6×
- Mathematics2.8× 1.2×
- Nursing0.3× 0.1×
- Medicine0.2× 0.1×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.7× 0.4×
- Computer Science2.4× 1.3×
- Dentistry0.0× 0.0×
- Physics and Astronomy1.9× 1.6×
- Chemistry2.9× 2.8×
- Veterinary0.0× 0.0×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.8× 1.0×
- Environmental Science1.6× 1.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.5× 0.6×
- Materials Science1.6× 2.8×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.8× 3.6×
- Energy1.3× 3.2×
- Engineering0.9× 2.4×
- Chemical Engineering2.6× 9.4×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where East China Normal University leans further are at the top, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, East China Normal University or King Abdullah University of Science and Technology?
East China Normal University publishes 1.7× as much research as King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in 2022–now (10k against 5.7k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, East China Normal University or King Abdullah University of Science and Technology?
28.3% of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 25.9% for East China Normal University.