Saveetha University vs University of British Columbia
On research quality in 2022–now, Saveetha University ranks #88 in the world and University of British Columbia #91, of 28,054 institutions. Saveetha University stands higher in 7 of the 16 fields both publish in, University of British Columbia in 9.
Research profiles alike: -0.14different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Saveetha University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #88
- #691 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 16.6%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 45%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Periodontics, General Dentistry, Dentistry.
University of British Columbia
- World rank, 2022–now
- #91
- #50 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 22.7%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 36%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Ecological Modeling.
Who leads in each field?
Saveetha University stands higher in 7 of 16 fields, University of British Columbia in 9. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #151Agricultural and Biological Sciences#119
- —Arts and Humanities#86
- #267Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#79
- —Business, Management and Accounting#159
- #88Chemistry—
- #79Computer Science#121
- #4Dentistry—
- #57Engineering#145
- #73Environmental Science#30
- #6Health Professions#56
- #39Materials Science—
- #129Medicine#60
- —Neuroscience#62
- #1Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics—
- —Psychology#25
- —Social Sciences#54
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Dentistry13.6× 1.1×
- Materials Science2.0× 0.7×
- Energy1.8× 0.6×
- Computer Science2.2× 0.8×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.2× 0.8×
- Engineering1.4× 0.8×
- Chemistry1.2× 0.7×
- Chemical Engineering1.1× 0.8×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.8× 0.6×
- Decision Sciences1.0× 0.8×
- Nursing0.9× 0.8×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.4× 0.4×
- Neuroscience1.3× 1.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.0× 1.2×
- Health Professions1.1× 1.4×
- Medicine0.9× 1.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.7× 1.0×
- Environmental Science0.8× 1.3×
- Mathematics0.5× 1.4×
- Psychology0.5× 1.7×
- Veterinary0.4× 1.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.2× 0.8×
- Physics and Astronomy0.2× 1.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.2× 1.1×
- Social Sciences0.1× 1.0×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 1.1×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Saveetha University leans further are at the top, University of British Columbia’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Saveetha University or University of British Columbia?
University of British Columbia publishes 1.0× as much research as Saveetha University in 2022–now (20k against 20k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Saveetha University or University of British Columbia?
22.7% of University of British Columbia's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 16.6% for Saveetha University.