Technical University of Munich vs The University of Queensland
On research quality in 2022–now, The University of Queensland ranks #74 in the world and Technical University of Munich #76, of 28,054 institutions. Technical University of Munich stands higher in 6 of the 15 fields both publish in, The University of Queensland in 9.
Research profiles alike: -0.46different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Technical University of Munich
- World rank, 2022–now
- #76
- #58 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 16k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 23.1%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 38%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Theoretical Computer Science, Hardware and Architecture, Software.
The University of Queensland
- World rank, 2022–now
- #74
- #103 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 17k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 27.4%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 34%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Equine, General Decision Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology.
Who leads in each field?
Technical University of Munich stands higher in 6 of 15 fields, The University of Queensland in 9. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #90Agricultural and Biological Sciences#105
- —Arts and Humanities#101
- #88Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#76
- #191Business, Management and Accounting#23
- #84Chemistry—
- #15Computer Science#197
- #91Engineering#184
- #69Environmental Science#26
- —Health Professions#13
- —Materials Science#81
- #73Mathematics—
- #125Medicine#75
- #53Physics and Astronomy—
- —Psychology#12
- #339Social Sciences#14
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Physics and Astronomy2.2× 0.7×
- Computer Science1.8× 0.6×
- Engineering1.9× 0.7×
- Chemical Engineering2.0× 0.8×
- Mathematics1.4× 0.6×
- Chemistry1.6× 0.7×
- Decision Sciences1.4× 1.1×
- Materials Science0.8× 0.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.9× 0.8×
- Energy1.0× 1.0×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.0× 1.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.0× 1.2×
- Environmental Science1.0× 1.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.6× 0.9×
- Neuroscience1.0× 1.6×
- Medicine0.6× 1.0×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.6× 1.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.7× 1.4×
- Nursing0.5× 1.2×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.5× 1.1×
- Psychology0.7× 1.7×
- Health Professions0.5× 1.6×
- Social Sciences0.4× 1.1×
- Veterinary0.8× 2.7×
- Arts and Humanities0.2× 1.0×
- Dentistry0.1× 1.5×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Technical University of Munich leans further are at the top, The University of Queensland’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Technical University of Munich or The University of Queensland?
The University of Queensland publishes 1.0× as much research as Technical University of Munich in 2022–now (17k against 16k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Technical University of Munich or The University of Queensland?
27.4% of The University of Queensland's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 23.1% for Technical University of Munich.