Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Medford · United States

Cambridge Systematics (United States)

camsys.comROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#22,287
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#4,642
of 7,310
Research works
245
▼ 28% vs 2018-21
Citations
5.1k
21.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
12.6%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.91×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
17%
world 40%
International
12%
world 18%
Cambridge Systematics (United States)

Which fields of science does Cambridge Systematics (United States) work in?

In 2022-now, 48% of research at Cambridge Systematics (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 30% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (21%), Social Sciences (19%), Medicine (11%).

Physical Sciences: 14 fractional works · 47.7% of its workEngineering: 6 fractional works · 20.8% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workBuilding and Construction: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workComputational Mechanics: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 2 fractional works · 7.7% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workCondensed Matter Physics: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 5.8% of its workWater Science and Technology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 5.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workModeling and Simulation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 9 fractional works · 30.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 6 fractional works · 19.1% of its workTransportation: 2 fractional works · 6.7% of its workGender Studies: 2 fractional works · 5.8% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 6.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Sciences: 4 fractional works · 12.7% of its workMedicine: 3 fractional works · 10.9% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 9.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDevelopmental Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDevelopmental Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workALL ITS WORKCambridgeSystematics…29fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences9%Physical Sciences48%Health Sciences13%Social Sciences30%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering620.8%
    2. Physics and Astronomy27.7%
    3. Environmental Science25.8%
    4. Computer Science25.6%
    5. Materials Science14.6%
    6. Mathematics11.9%
    7. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.6%
    8. Energy00.6%
    9. Chemistry00.0%
    1. Social Sciences619.1%
    2. Psychology26.5%
    3. Arts and Humanities12.3%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.3%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.9%
    6. Decision Sciences00.4%
    1. Medicine310.9%
    2. Health Professions01.7%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences13.6%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology13.6%
    3. Neuroscience12.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.75× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.67× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 1.29× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.72× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.38× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.63× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 1.39× its world share, 6 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.18× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 1.32× its world share, 1 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 1.65× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 3.46× its world share, 2 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.66× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.57× its world share, 3 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.80× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.63× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.12× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.51× its world share, 6 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Physics and Astronomy, 3.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 20 fields, with their numbers
  1. Physics and Astronomy3.46×2 works
  2. Psychology2.12×2 works
  3. Mathematics1.65×1 works
  4. Social Sciences1.51×6 works
  5. Engineering1.39×6 works
  6. Materials Science1.32×1 works
  7. Neuroscience1.29×1 works
  8. Environmental Science1.18×2 works
  9. Arts and Humanities0.80×1 works
  10. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.75×1 works
  11. Computer Science0.72×2 works
  12. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.67×1 works
  13. Health Professions0.66×0 works
  14. Energy0.63×0 works
  15. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.63×0 works
  16. Medicine0.57×3 works
  17. Decision Sciences0.40×0 works
  18. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.38×0 works
  19. Business, Management and Accounting0.27×0 works
  20. Chemistry0.02×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Cambridge Systematics (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Arun R. Kuppam, Kimon E. Proussaloglou and Birger R. Headstrom lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Cambridge Systematics (United States).

  1. 1 Arun R. Kuppam United States · #1,970,478 worldwide 554 citations · 23 works
  2. 2 Kimon E. Proussaloglou United States · #2,102,811 worldwide 743 citations · 26 works
  3. 3 Birger R. Headstrom United States · #2,800,606 worldwide 1.9k citations · 25 works
  4. 4 Vassili Alexiadis United States · #3,629,018 worldwide 738 citations · 47 works
  5. 5 Herbert Weinblatt United States · #3,655,612 worldwide 177 citations · 26 works
  6. 6 Anurag Komanduri United States · #3,752,341 worldwide 108 citations · 15 works
  7. 7 Maren L. Outwater United States · #3,766,932 worldwide 677 citations · 50 works
  8. 8 Jeffrey N Buxbaum United States · #4,694,411 worldwide 196 citations · 22 works
  9. 9 J H Suhrbier United States · #4,745,833 worldwide 310 citations · 58 works
  10. 10 Krishnan Viswanathan United States · #4,921,173 worldwide 152 citations · 22 works
All ranked researchers at Cambridge Systematics (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Cambridge Systematics (United States)?

The most cited paper from Cambridge Systematics (United States) is "The promises of big data and small data for travel behavior (aka human mobility) analysis" (Cynthia Chen, Jingtao Ma, Yusak Octavius Susilo et al., 2016), with 588 citations. Next come "The goods/leisure tradeoff and disaggregate work trip mode choice models" (293) and "The Pontis Bridge Management System" (285).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The promises of big data and small data for travel behavior (aka human mobility) analysis Cynthia Chen, Jingtao Ma, Yusak Octavius Susilo et al. · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies Open access 27 Apr 2016 588
2 The goods/leisure tradeoff and disaggregate work trip mode choice models Kenneth E. Train, Daniel L. McFadden · Transportation Research Oct 1978 293
3 The Pontis Bridge Management System Paul D. Thompson, Edgar P. Small, Mike Johnson et al. · Structural Engineering International Nov 1998 285
4 Locating Electric Vehicle Charging Stations T. Donna Chen, Kara Maria Kockelman, Moby Khan · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2013 259
5 An algorithm for modularity analysis of directed and weighted biological networks based on edge-betweenness centrality Jeongah Yoon, Anselm Blumer, Kyongbum Lee · Bioinformatics Open access 23 Oct 2006 237
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Cambridge Systematics (United States)?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Gender, Neoliberalism, Feminism, Travel Behavior, Intelligent Transportation Systems, Traffic Flow, International Relations and Public Transport.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 14 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 14 words, with their numbers
  1. Gender2▲ 11×3 topics
  2. Neoliberalism2▲ 16×3 topics
  3. Deep Learning1▲ 1.34×4 topics
  4. Feminism1▲ 16×2 topics
  5. Intelligent Transportation Systems1▲ 26×2 topics
  6. International Relations1▲ 16×4 topics
  7. Public Transport1▲ 68×1 topic
  8. Service Quality1▲ 14×1 topic
  9. Traffic Flow1▲ 37×2 topics
  10. Travel Behavior1▲ 44×2 topics
  11. Celebrity Culture1▲ 108×1 topic
  12. Nanoparticles1▲ 2.8×4 topics
  13. Postfeminism1▲ 108×1 topic
  14. Self-Assembly1▲ 11×2 topics

Which research topics does Cambridge Systematics (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Transportation Planning and Optimization, Gender, Feminism, and Media, Urban Transport and Accessibility and Traffic and Road Safety.

Transportation Planning and Optimization: 1 fractional worksGender, Feminism, and Media: 1 fractional worksUrban Transport and Acce…1Urban Transport and Accessibility: 1 fractional worksTraffic and Road Safety1Traffic and Road Safety: 1 fractional worksTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques: 1 fractional worksModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence: 1 fractional worksAsphalt Pavement Perform…0Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation: 0 fractional worksTraffic control and management: 0 fractional worksContemporary Cultural and Social Studies: 0 fractional worksQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture: 0 fractional works
TransportationGender StudiesSafety, Risk, Reliability and QualityBuilding and Construction5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Transportation Planning and Optimization Transportation 1 works
  2. 2 Gender, Feminism, and Media Gender Studies 1 works
  3. 3 Urban Transport and Accessibility Transportation 1 works
  4. 4 Traffic and Road Safety Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 1 works
  5. 5 Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques Building and Construction 1 works
  6. 6 Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence Mechanical Engineering 1 works
  7. 7 Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  8. 8 Traffic control and management Control and Systems Engineering 0 works
  9. 9 Contemporary Cultural and Social Studies Social Psychology 0 works
  10. 10 Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture Artificial Intelligence 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available17.1%not open82.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors12.5%domestic only87.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Cambridge Systematics (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 28% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cambridge Systematics (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00010% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Cambridge Systematics (United States)0.00011% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Cambridge Systematics (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Medford

All research institutions in Medford

Share Cambridge Systematics (United States)'s ranking

Cambridge Systematics (United States) on Science Explorer

A card with Cambridge Systematics (United States)'s standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Cambridge Systematics (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.