Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Olympia · United States

Cascadia Research Collective

cascadiaresearch.orgROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#31,957
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#6,729
of 7,310
Research works
140
▼ 14% vs 2018-21
Citations
4.4k
31.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
10.9%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.08×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
58%
world 40%
International
26%
world 18%
Cascadia Research Collective

Which fields of science does Cascadia Research Collective work in?

In 2022-now, 60% of research at Cascadia Research Collective is in Physical Sciences, 24% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (38%), Earth and Planetary Sciences (16%), Social Sciences (12%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 21 fractional works · 59.8% of its workEnvironmental Science: 13 fractional works · 38.1% of its workEcology: 10 fractional works · 27.1% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 6 fractional works · 15.9% of its workOceanography: 3 fractional works · 8.7% of its workAtmospheric Science: 2 fractional works · 6.2% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 8 fractional works · 23.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 12.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPsychology: 4 fractional works · 9.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 4 fractional works · 11.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 5.7% of its workDevelopmental Biology: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.0% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 3.8% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workALL ITS WORKCascadia ResearchCollective35fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences11%Physical Sciences60%Health Sciences5%Social Sciences24%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 19 fields, with their numbers
    1. Environmental Science1338.1%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences615.9%
    3. Chemistry12.3%
    4. Engineering11.6%
    5. Computer Science00.9%
    6. Materials Science00.6%
    7. Mathematics00.2%
    8. Energy00.1%
    1. Social Sciences412.3%
    2. Psychology49.9%
    3. Arts and Humanities01.4%
    4. Decision Sciences00.2%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology25.7%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences13.9%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology11.6%
    4. Neuroscience00.3%
    1. Medicine13.8%
    2. Health Professions00.7%
    3. Nursing00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.82× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.06× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.56× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 1.50× its world share, 1 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 10.12× its world share, 6 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 7.67× its world share, 14 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.20× its world share, 1 worksMedicineNursing: 1.12× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 3.25× its world share, 4 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.97× its world share, 4 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 10.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 19 fields, with their numbers
  1. Earth and Planetary Sciences10.12×6 works
  2. Environmental Science7.67×14 works
  3. Psychology3.25×4 works
  4. Immunology and Microbiology1.56×1 works
  5. Chemistry1.50×1 works
  6. Nursing1.12×0 works
  7. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.06×2 works
  8. Social Sciences0.97×4 works
  9. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.82×1 works
  10. Arts and Humanities0.49×0 works
  11. Health Professions0.27×0 works
  12. Mathematics0.20×0 works
  13. Medicine0.20×1 works
  14. Neuroscience0.19×0 works
  15. Materials Science0.17×0 works
  16. Decision Sciences0.16×0 works
  17. Energy0.13×0 works
  18. Computer Science0.12×0 works
  19. Engineering0.10×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Cascadia Research Collective?

Ranked on the quality score, John A. Calambokidis, Robin William Baird and Gregory S. Schorr lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Cascadia Research Collective.

  1. 1 John A. Calambokidis United States · #98,067 worldwide 13k citations · 322 works
  2. 2 Robin William Baird United States · #283,178 worldwide 9.9k citations · 293 works
  3. 3 Gregory S. Schorr United States · #400,003 worldwide 3.9k citations · 99 works
  4. 4 Erin A. Falcone United States · #814,057 worldwide 2.2k citations · 62 works
  5. 5 Greg S. Schorr United States · #1,236,523 worldwide 674 citations · 18 works
  6. 6 Jennifer B. Tennessen United States · #1,275,909 worldwide 803 citations · 27 works
  7. 7 Gretchen H. Steiger United States · #1,781,116 worldwide 1.3k citations · 25 works
  8. 8 Sabre D. Mahaffy United States · #1,945,525 worldwide 1.2k citations · 52 works
  9. 9 Kiirsten Flynn United States · #1,949,462 worldwide 482 citations · 23 works
  10. 10 Daniel J. McSweeney United States · #1,965,337 worldwide 1.6k citations · 60 works
All ranked researchers at Cascadia Research Collective

What are the most cited papers from Cascadia Research Collective?

The most cited paper from Cascadia Research Collective is "Sink or Swim: Strategies for Cost-Efficient Diving by Marine Mammals" (Terrie M. Williams, Randall William Davis, Lee A. Fuiman et al., 2000), with 453 citations. Next come "Understanding the impacts of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales" (418) and "Southern Hemisphere humpback whales wintering off Central America: insights from water temperature into the longest mammalian migration" (365).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Sink or Swim: Strategies for Cost-Efficient Diving by Marine Mammals Terrie M. Williams, Randall William Davis, Lee A. Fuiman et al. · Science 7 Apr 2000 453
2 Understanding the impacts of anthropogenic sound on beaked whales Tara M. Cox et al. · ˜The œjournal of cetacean research and management. Special issue Open access 14 Mar 2023 418
3 Southern Hemisphere humpback whales wintering off Central America: insights from water temperature into the longest mammalian migration Kristin Rasmussen, Daniel M. Palacios, John A. Calambokidis et al. · Biology Letters Open access 3 Apr 2007 365
4 Comparison of warm and cold years on the southeastern Bering Sea shelf and some implications for the ecosystem Phyllis J. Stabeno, Nancy B. Kachel, Sue E. Moore et al. · Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography 21 Feb 2012 340
5 First Long-Term Behavioral Records from Cuvier’s Beaked Whales (Ziphius cavirostris) Reveal Record-Breaking Dives Gregory S. Schorr, Erin A. Falcone, David Moretti et al. · PLoS ONE Open access 26 Mar 2014 338
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Cascadia Research Collective?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Conservation, Population Dynamics, Acoustic Communication, Predator-Prey Interactions, Anthropogenic Noise, Marine Mammals and Resilience.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 37 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 37 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change14▲ 14×23 topics
  2. Conservation10▲ 62×6 topics
  3. Population Dynamics9▲ 103×7 topics
  4. Acoustic Communication9▲ 494×2 topics
  5. Predator-Prey Interactions8▲ 285×2 topics
  6. Anthropogenic Noise8▲ 788×1 topic
  7. Marine Mammals8▲ 788×1 topic
  8. Mental Health2▲ 4.6×4 topics
  9. Resilience2▲ 13×3 topics
  10. Ocean Acidification2▲ 79×3 topics
  11. Remote Sensing2▲ 4.8×3 topics
  12. Arctic2▲ 51×2 topics
  13. Life Satisfaction2▲ 83×2 topics
  14. Ocean Circulation2▲ 41×2 topics
  15. Positive Emotions2▲ 49×2 topics
  16. Positive Psychology2▲ 72×2 topics
  17. Decline2▲ 203×1 topic
  18. Marine Ecosystems2▲ 99×2 topics
  19. Sea Ice2▲ 203×1 topic
  20. Acoustic Techniques2▲ 155×1 topic
  21. Seafloor Mapping2▲ 155×1 topic
  22. Migration2▲ 14×2 topics
  23. Fisheries1▲ 93×2 topics
  24. Trophic Cascades1▲ 39×2 topics
  25. Avian Vocal Communication1▲ 208×1 topic
  26. Birdsong1▲ 208×1 topic
  27. Ecosystem Management1▲ 52×1 topic
  28. Fisheries Sustainability1▲ 36×2 topics
  29. Marine Fisheries1▲ 75×1 topic
  30. Rays1▲ 143×1 topic
  31. Sharks1▲ 143×1 topic
  32. Adversity1▲ 41×1 topic
  33. Happiness1▲ 60×1 topic
  34. Hope Theory1▲ 132×1 topic
  35. Optimism1▲ 132×1 topic
  36. Psychological Resilience1▲ 32×1 topic
  37. Well-being1▲ 7.3×1 topic

Which research topics does Cascadia Research Collective publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Marine animal studies overview, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, Underwater Acoustics Research and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior.

Marine animal studies ov…8Marine animal studies overview: 8 fractional worksArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics: 2 fractional worksUnderwater Acoustics Research: 2 fractional worksAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior: 1 fractional worksIchthyology and Marine Biology: 1 fractional worksMarine and fisheries research: 1 fractional worksOptimism, Hope, and Well-being: 1 fractional worksResilience and Mental Health: 1 fractional worksPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction: 1 fractional worksMarine and coastal plant biology: 1 fractional works
EcologyAtmospheric ScienceOceanographyDevelopmental Biology5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Marine animal studies overview Ecology 8 works
  2. 2 Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics Atmospheric Science 2 works
  3. 3 Underwater Acoustics Research Oceanography 2 works
  4. 4 Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior Developmental Biology 1 works
  5. 5 Ichthyology and Marine Biology Nature and Landscape Conservation 1 works
  6. 6 Marine and fisheries research Global and Planetary Change 1 works
  7. 7 Optimism, Hope, and Well-being Applied Psychology 1 works
  8. 8 Resilience and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 1 works
  9. 9 Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction Social Psychology 1 works
  10. 10 Marine and coastal plant biology Oceanography 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available58.5%not open41.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors26.4%domestic only73.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Cascadia Research Collective's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 14% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Cascadia Research Collective as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000088% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%Cascadia Research Collective0.000099% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Cascadia Research Collective over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Olympia

All research institutions in Olympia

Share Cascadia Research Collective's ranking

Cascadia Research Collective on Science Explorer

A card with Cascadia Research Collective's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Cascadia Research Collective. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.