Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · Coyoacán · Mexico

Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir

In research, Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir stands highest in Social Sciences (#13,191 of 16,945 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#9,272 of 10,206 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Social Sciences — Social Sciences is 5.1× its share of world research.

World rank, 2022–2025
#24,081
of 28,054 · #40,656 all time
Rank in Mexico
#185
of 252
Research works
251
▲ 68% vs 2013–17
Citations
338
1.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
16.4%
record average 16.5%
Open access
86%
world 28%

What is Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #13,191 of 16,945 9.6%202
Social SciencesField #9,272 of 10,206 9.7%168

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

What does Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Social Sciences takes 5.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Social SciencesField · 42.5 works5.1×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.25× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 0.27× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.12× its world share, 4 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceDentistry: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 0.68× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.48× its world share, 6 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.62× its world share, 5 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.65× its world share, 4 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.69× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 5.09× its world share, 42 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 5.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Human Rights, European Union, Globalization, Constitutional Law, Social Rights, Judicial Review, Latin America and Sustainable Development.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Human Rights13▲ 19×14 topics
  2. European Union10▲ 67×6 topics
  3. Globalization9▲ 7.3×14 topics
  4. Constitutional Law9▲ 98×4 topics
  5. Social Rights8▲ 382×2 topics
  6. Judicial Review8▲ 135×4 topics
  7. Sustainable Development7▲ 6.3×6 topics
  8. Latin America6▲ 50×8 topics
  9. COVID-195▲ 5.8×5 topics
  10. Criminal Justice5▲ 33×2 topics
  11. Schengen Area5▲ 252×2 topics
  12. Environmental Law5▲ 34×3 topics
  13. Welfare State5▲ 81×3 topics
  14. Labor Law4▲ 262×2 topics
  15. Human Dignity4▲ 163×2 topics
  16. Equality4▲ 107×3 topics
  17. International Law4▲ 21×4 topics
  18. Legal Philosophy4▲ 99×2 topics
  19. Legal Theory4▲ 92×2 topics
  20. Consent4▲ 367×1 topic
  21. Constitutionalism4▲ 66×3 topics
  22. Patient Autonomy4▲ 180×1 topic
  23. Public Administration4▲ 72×2 topics
  24. Constitutional Rights4▲ 315×1 topic
  25. Inter-American Court4▲ 315×1 topic
  26. Transparency4▲ 48×2 topics
  27. Government4▲ 556×1 topic
  28. Legal Studies4▲ 765×1 topic
  29. Education4▲ 3.3×12 topics
  30. Contractual Law4▲ 427×1 topic
  31. Responsibility4▲ 121×1 topic
  32. Community Participation3▲ 13×4 topics
  33. Legal Evidence3▲ 326×1 topic
  34. Standards of Proof3▲ 326×1 topic
  35. Prison System2▲ 67×2 topics
  36. Gender2▲ 6.8×5 topics
  37. Democracy2▲ 9.5×4 topics
  38. Environmental Education2▲ 22×2 topics
  39. Rural Tourism2▲ 101×2 topics
  40. Ecotourism2▲ 341×1 topic

Which research topics does Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Ethics and bioethics in healthcare, Human Rights and Immigration, Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies and Administrative Law and Governance.

  1. 1 Ethics and bioethics in healthcare Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4 works
  2. 2 Human Rights and Immigration Sociology and Political Science 4 works
  3. 3 Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies Political Science and International Relations 4 works
  4. 4 Administrative Law and Governance Political Science and International Relations 4 works
  5. 5 Comparative International Legal Studies Political Science and International Relations 4 works
  6. 6 Legal processes and jurisprudence Law 3 works
  7. 7 Finance, Taxation, and Governance Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
  8. 8 Criminal Justice and Penology Law 2 works
  9. 9 Political Theory and Democracy Political Science and International Relations 2 works
  10. 10 Labor Law and Work Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available85.9%not open14.1%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors32.1%domestic only67.9%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 68% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Coyoacán

All research institutions in Coyoacán

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.