Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir
In research, Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir stands highest in Social Sciences (#13,191 of 16,945 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#9,272 of 10,206 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Social Sciences — Social Sciences is 5.1× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #24,081 of 28,054 · #40,656 all time
- Rank in Mexico
- #185 of 252
- Research works
- 251 ▲ 68% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 338 1.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 16.4% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 86% world 28%
What is Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #13,191 of 16,945 | 9.6% | 202 | |
| Social SciencesField | #9,272 of 10,206 | 9.7% | 168 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Social Sciences takes 5.1× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Social SciencesField · 42.5 works5.1×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 5.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Social Sciences 5.1×
- Arts and Humanities 2.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.6×
- Environmental Science 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.7×
- Health Professions 0.7×
- Medicine 0.5×
- Computer Science 0.3×
- Energy 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Dentistry 0.2×
- Psychology 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Engineering 0.0×
Which keywords describe research at Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Human Rights, European Union, Globalization, Constitutional Law, Social Rights, Judicial Review, Latin America and Sustainable Development.
- Ecotourism
- Environmental Education
- Gender
- Standards of Proof
- Community Participation
- Contractual Law
- Legal Studies
- Transparency
- Constitutional Rights
- Patient Autonomy
- Consent
- Legal Philosophy
- Equality
- Labor Law
- Environmental Law
- Criminal Justice
- Latin America
- Judicial Review
- Constitutional Law
- European Union
- Human Rights
- Globalization
- Social Rights
- Sustainable Development
- COVID-19
- Schengen Area
- Welfare State
- Human Dignity
- International Law
- Legal Theory
- Constitutionalism
- Public Administration
- Inter-American Court
- Government
- Education
- Responsibility
- Legal Evidence
- Prison System
- Democracy
- Rural Tourism
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Human Rights13▲ 19×14 topics
- European Union10▲ 67×6 topics
- Globalization9▲ 7.3×14 topics
- Constitutional Law9▲ 98×4 topics
- Social Rights8▲ 382×2 topics
- Judicial Review8▲ 135×4 topics
- Sustainable Development7▲ 6.3×6 topics
- Latin America6▲ 50×8 topics
- COVID-195▲ 5.8×5 topics
- Criminal Justice5▲ 33×2 topics
- Schengen Area5▲ 252×2 topics
- Environmental Law5▲ 34×3 topics
- Welfare State5▲ 81×3 topics
- Labor Law4▲ 262×2 topics
- Human Dignity4▲ 163×2 topics
- Equality4▲ 107×3 topics
- International Law4▲ 21×4 topics
- Legal Philosophy4▲ 99×2 topics
- Legal Theory4▲ 92×2 topics
- Consent4▲ 367×1 topic
- Constitutionalism4▲ 66×3 topics
- Patient Autonomy4▲ 180×1 topic
- Public Administration4▲ 72×2 topics
- Constitutional Rights4▲ 315×1 topic
- Inter-American Court4▲ 315×1 topic
- Transparency4▲ 48×2 topics
- Government4▲ 556×1 topic
- Legal Studies4▲ 765×1 topic
- Education4▲ 3.3×12 topics
- Contractual Law4▲ 427×1 topic
- Responsibility4▲ 121×1 topic
- Community Participation3▲ 13×4 topics
- Legal Evidence3▲ 326×1 topic
- Standards of Proof3▲ 326×1 topic
- Prison System2▲ 67×2 topics
- Gender2▲ 6.8×5 topics
- Democracy2▲ 9.5×4 topics
- Environmental Education2▲ 22×2 topics
- Rural Tourism2▲ 101×2 topics
- Ecotourism2▲ 341×1 topic
Which research topics does Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Ethics and bioethics in healthcare, Human Rights and Immigration, Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies and Administrative Law and Governance.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Ethics and bioethics in healthcare Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 4 works
- 2 Human Rights and Immigration Sociology and Political Science 4 works
- 3 Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies Political Science and International Relations 4 works
- 4 Administrative Law and Governance Political Science and International Relations 4 works
- 5 Comparative International Legal Studies Political Science and International Relations 4 works
- 6 Legal processes and jurisprudence Law 3 works
- 7 Finance, Taxation, and Governance Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
- 8 Criminal Justice and Penology Law 2 works
- 9 Political Theory and Democracy Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 10 Labor Law and Work Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Católicas por el Derecho a Decidir's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 68% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Coyoacán
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.