Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Archive · Tver' · Russia

Central Forest Nature Reserve

clgz.ruROR OpenAlex
Research works
60
▼ 3% vs 2018-21
Citations
499
8.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
1.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
38%
world 40%
International
18%
world 18%
Central Forest Nature Reserve

Not ranked overall: Central Forest Nature Reserve is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Central Forest Nature Reserve work in?

In all years, 71% of research at Central Forest Nature Reserve is in Physical Sciences, 23% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (61%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (16%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (7%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 42 fractional works · 70.9% of its workEnvironmental Science: 36 fractional works · 60.6% of its workEcology: 25 fractional works · 42.3% of its workEcological Modeling: 3 fractional works · 5.3% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 3 fractional works · 4.6% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 4 fractional works · 7.3% of its workAtmospheric Science: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workOceanography: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workGeology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeometry and Topology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 14 fractional works · 23.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 9 fractional works · 15.7% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 3 fractional works · 4.2% of its workSoil Science: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workPlant Science: 2 fractional works · 2.9% of its workInsect Science: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workForestry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 4 fractional works · 7.4% of its workGenetics: 4 fractional works · 6.2% of its workDevelopmental Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.1% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 2.9% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKCentral ForestNature Reserve60fractional works, all years
Life Sciences23%Physical Sciences71%Health Sciences3%Social Sciences3%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Environmental Science3660.6%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences47.3%
    3. Engineering12.0%
    4. Mathematics00.7%
    5. Materials Science00.2%
    6. Computer Science00.1%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences915.7%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology47.4%
    1. Health Professions11.5%
    2. Medicine11.4%
    3. Veterinary00.3%
    1. Arts and Humanities12.3%
    2. Psychology00.4%
    3. Social Sciences00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 3.13× its world share, 3 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.69× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 3.36× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 14.07× its world share, 14 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 1.43× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 0.64× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksMedicineVeterinary: 6.21× its world share, 0 worksVeterinary1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 14.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 10 fields, with their numbers
  1. Environmental Science14.07×14 works
  2. Veterinary6.21×0 works
  3. Earth and Planetary Sciences3.36×1 works
  4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences3.13×3 works
  5. Mathematics1.43×0 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.69×1 works
  7. Health Professions0.64×0 works
  8. Engineering0.06×0 works
  9. Computer Science0.05×0 works
  10. Medicine0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Central Forest Nature Reserve?

Ranked on the quality score, Igor L. Tumanov, Sergey S. Ogurtsov and Anatoliy S. Zheltukhin lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Central Forest Nature Reserve.

  1. 1 Igor L. Tumanov Russia · #1,533,126 worldwide 639 citations · 21 works
  2. 2 Sergey S. Ogurtsov Russia · #4,007,746 worldwide 91 citations · 37 works
  3. 3 Anatoliy S. Zheltukhin Russia · #5,064,467 worldwide 77 citations · 19 works
  4. 4 Pavel N. Korablev Russia · #5,926,484 worldwide 133 citations · 33 works
All ranked researchers at Central Forest Nature Reserve

What are the most cited papers from Central Forest Nature Reserve?

The most cited paper from Central Forest Nature Reserve is "Sudden expansion of a single brown bear maternal lineage across northern continental Eurasia after the last ice age: a general demographic model for mammals?" (Marju Korsten et al., 2009), with 138 citations. Next come "Mitogenetic structure of brown bears ( Ursus arctos L.) in northeastern Europe and a new time frame for the formation of European brown bear lineages" (130) and "Carbon dioxide exchange of a Russian boreal forest after disturbance by wind throw" (123).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Sudden expansion of a single brown bear maternal lineage across northern continental Eurasia after the last ice age: a general demographic model for mammals? Marju Korsten et al. · Molecular Ecology Open access 30 Mar 2009 138
2 Mitogenetic structure of brown bears ( Ursus arctos L.) in northeastern Europe and a new time frame for the formation of European brown bear lineages Urmas Saarma, Simon Y. W. Ho, Oliver George Pybus et al. · Molecular Ecology 27 Nov 2006 130
3 Carbon dioxide exchange of a Russian boreal forest after disturbance by wind throw Alexander Knohl, Olaf Kolle, Tatiana Yu. Minayeva et al. · Global Change Biology Mar 2002 123
4 Phenological shifts of abiotic events, producers and consumers across a continent Tomas V. Roslin et al. · Nature Climate Change Open access205 authors 28 Jan 2021 103
5 Factors promoting larch dominance in central Siberia: fire versus growth performance and implications for carbon dynamics at the boundary of evergreen and deciduous conifers Ernst‐Detlef Schulze, Christian Wirth, Danilo Mollicone et al. · Biogeosciences Open access 16 Apr 2012 68
All 61 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Central Forest Nature Reserve?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Population Dynamics, Invasive Species, Climate Change, Biodiversity, Conservation Biology, Habitat Selection, Animal Movement and Occupancy Rates.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Population Dynamics19▲ 102×8 topics
  2. Invasive Species16▲ 46×11 topics
  3. Climate Change16▲ 9.9×34 topics
  4. Biodiversity13▲ 28×13 topics
  5. Conservation Biology10▲ 154×3 topics
  6. Habitat Selection9▲ 169×2 topics
  7. Animal Movement9▲ 259×1 topic
  8. Occupancy Rates9▲ 259×1 topic
  9. Predator-Prey Interactions8▲ 140×2 topics
  10. Island Ecosystems7▲ 253×1 topic
  11. Rodent Eradication7▲ 378×1 topic
  12. Species Richness6▲ 127×2 topics
  13. Beaver Dams5▲ 779×1 topic
  14. Ecosystem Engineering5▲ 234×1 topic
  15. Conservation5▲ 16×10 topics
  16. Ecological Niche3▲ 110×1 topic
  17. Species Distribution Modeling3▲ 110×1 topic
  18. Remote Sensing3▲ 4.4×8 topics
  19. Biodiversity Conservation2▲ 16×5 topics
  20. Global Change2▲ 13×3 topics
  21. Habitat Fragmentation2▲ 14×5 topics
  22. Ecosystem Resilience2▲ 21×4 topics
  23. Ecological Knowledge2▲ 72×2 topics
  24. Food Security2▲ 7.8×3 topics
  25. Genetic Diversity2▲ 6.5×4 topics
  26. Desertification2▲ 83×2 topics
  27. Microbial Communities2▲ 8.9×2 topics
  28. Biomass Estimation2▲ 25×3 topics
  29. Evolution2▲ 9.7×4 topics
  30. Genomics2▲ 8.2×2 topics
  31. Paleosols2▲ 282×1 topic
  32. Soil Evolution2▲ 282×1 topic
  33. Ecosystem2▲ 18×3 topics
  34. Forest Management2▲ 46×3 topics
  35. Population Genetics2▲ 17×2 topics
  36. Ancient DNA1▲ 39×2 topics
  37. Ecology1▲ 11×4 topics
  38. Genetic Structure1▲ 29×2 topics
  39. Hydrology1▲ 21×3 topics
  40. Vegetation1▲ 23×2 topics

Which research topics does Central Forest Nature Reserve publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies, Ecology and biodiversity studies and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology.

Wildlife Ecology and Con…4Wildlife Ecology and Conservation: 4 fractional worksAnimal Ecology and Behav…3Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies: 3 fractional worksEcology and biodiversity…2Ecology and biodiversity studies: 2 fractional worksRangeland Management and…1Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology: 1 fractional worksSpecies Distribution and Climate Change: 1 fractional worksSoil and Environmental Studies: 1 fractional worksGenetic diversity and population structure: 0 fractional worksGeological Studies and Exploration: 0 fractional worksAgriculture and Biological Studies: 0 fractional worksLand Use and Ecosystem Services: 0 fractional works
EcologyManagement, Monitoring, Policy and LawEcological ModelingSoil Science4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology 4 works
  2. 2 Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies Ecology 3 works
  3. 3 Ecology and biodiversity studies Ecology 2 works
  4. 4 Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
  5. 5 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 1 works
  6. 6 Soil and Environmental Studies Soil Science 1 works
  7. 7 Genetic diversity and population structure Genetics 0 works
  8. 8 Geological Studies and Exploration Geology 0 works
  9. 9 Agriculture and Biological Studies General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0 works
  10. 10 Land Use and Ecosystem Services Global and Planetary Change 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available38.0%not open62.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors18.3%domestic only81.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Central Forest Nature Reserve's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 3% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Central Forest Nature Reserve as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00011% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Central Forest Nature Reserve0.000048% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Central Forest Nature Reserve over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Tver'

All research institutions in Tver'

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Central Forest Nature Reserve. Posts are plain text and can be reported.