Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Krakow · Poland

Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych

In research, Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,083 of 9,585 worldwide), 2022-now.

World rank, 2022-now
#19,181
of 22,385 · #16,733 all time
Rank in Poland
#214
of 255
Research works
594
▼ 34% vs 2018-21
Citations
825
1.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.1%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.99×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
62%
world 40%
International
6%
world 18%
Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych

What is Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorksAll time
Social SciencesDomain #6,083 of 9,585 9.9%78 #5521

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych work in?

In 2022-now, 85% of research at Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych is in Social Sciences, 8% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (55%), Arts and Humanities (17%), Business, Management and Accounting (7%). It does 3.2× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 83 fractional works · 84.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 53 fractional works · 54.6% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 16 fractional works · 16.1% of its workLinguistics and Language: 5 fractional works · 5.5% of its workUrban Studies: 5 fractional works · 5.4% of its workEducation: 5 fractional works · 5.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 5 fractional works · 4.7% of its workAnthropology: 3 fractional works · 3.5% of its workSafety Research: 3 fractional works · 3.2% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 3 fractional works · 2.8% of its workCultural Studies: 3 fractional works · 2.6% of its workLaw: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 17 fractional works · 17.4% of its workHistory: 5 fractional works · 4.7% of its workReligious studies: 3 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPhilosophy: 3 fractional works · 3.0% of its workArcheology: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workClassics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeneral Arts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 6 fractional works · 6.6% of its workStrategy and Management: 4 fractional works · 4.0% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 3 fractional works · 3.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPhysical Sciences: 8 fractional works · 8.3% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 2.4% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 2 fractional works · 1.5% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnergy: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGeneral Energy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 4 fractional works · 3.8% of its workMedicine: 4 fractional works · 3.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 3.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKCentrum KopernikaBadań…98fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences8%Health Sciences4%Social Sciences85%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences5354.6%
    2. Arts and Humanities1717.4%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting66.6%
    4. Psychology33.5%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance22.2%
    6. Decision Sciences10.6%
    1. Engineering22.4%
    2. Environmental Science21.8%
    3. Energy21.7%
    4. Computer Science11.3%
    5. Physics and Astronomy00.4%
    6. Chemistry00.3%
    7. Materials Science00.1%
    8. Mathematics00.1%
    1. Medicine43.7%
    2. Health Professions00.1%
    3. Nursing00.0%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences11.4%
    2. Neuroscience11.0%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology10.7%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.28× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.12× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 0.63× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.17× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 1.86× its world share, 2 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.16× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.36× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.19× its world share, 4 worksMedicineNursing: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 6.02× its world share, 17 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 2.04× its world share, 6 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.59× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.05× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.16× its world share, 3 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 4.31× its world share, 53 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 6.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 20 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities6.02×17 works
  2. Social Sciences4.31×53 works
  3. Business, Management and Accounting2.04×6 works
  4. Energy1.86×2 works
  5. Psychology1.16×3 works
  6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.05×2 works
  7. Neuroscience0.63×1 works
  8. Decision Sciences0.59×1 works
  9. Environmental Science0.36×2 works
  10. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.28×1 works
  11. Chemistry0.21×0 works
  12. Physics and Astronomy0.19×0 works
  13. Medicine0.19×4 works
  14. Computer Science0.17×1 works
  15. Engineering0.16×2 works
  16. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.12×1 works
  17. Mathematics0.10×0 works
  18. Nursing0.09×0 works
  19. Materials Science0.04×0 works
  20. Health Professions0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych?

Ranked on the quality score, Tomasz Ososiński, Marcin Gorazda and Urszula Żydek-Bednarczuk lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych.

  1. 1 Tomasz Ososiński Poland · #3,842,773 worldwide 2 citations · 22 works
  2. 2 Marcin Gorazda Poland · #4,234,302 worldwide 1 citations · 28 works
  3. 3 Urszula Żydek-Bednarczuk Poland · #4,432,044 worldwide 16 citations · 20 works
  4. 4 Miłosz Czopek Poland · #4,618,614 worldwide 5 citations · 15 works
  5. 5 Tadeusz Sierotowicz Poland · #5,079,522 worldwide 48 citations · 55 works
  6. 6 Józef Życiński Poland · #5,943,335 worldwide 13 citations · 49 works
All ranked researchers at Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych

What are the most cited papers from Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych?

The most cited paper from Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych is "Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications" (Robin Andersson, Stefan Enroth, Álvaro Rada-Iglesias et al., 2009), with 332 citations. Next come "MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF CANCER INVASION: THE IMPORTANCE OF CELL–CELL ADHESION AND CELL–MATRIX ADHESION" (112) and "Protein-protein interaction and pathway databases, a graphical review" (77).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Nucleosomes are well positioned in exons and carry characteristic histone modifications Robin Andersson, Stefan Enroth, Álvaro Rada-Iglesias et al. · Genome Research Open access 17 Aug 2009 332
2 MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF CANCER INVASION: THE IMPORTANCE OF CELL–CELL ADHESION AND CELL–MATRIX ADHESION Mark A. J. Chaplain, Mirosław Lachowicz, Zuzanna Szymańska et al. · Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 29 Dec 2010 112
3 Protein-protein interaction and pathway databases, a graphical review Tomas Klingström, Dariusz M. Plewczynski · Briefings in Bioinformatics Open access 17 Sep 2010 77
4 Future development of biologically relevant dosimetry Hugo Palmans, Hans Rabus, Ana Belchior et al. · British Journal of Radiology Open access 26 Sep 2014 69
5 [Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Validity and reliability of different versions of the scale--review]. Rafał Albiński, Angelika Kleszczewska-Albińska, Sylwia Bedyńska · PubMed 31 Jan 2012 59
All 61 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Education, Cultural Studies, Migration, Globalization, Nationalism, Ethnography, Innovation and Cultural Discourse.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Education12▲ 7.1×11 topics
  2. Globalization10▲ 5.0×9 topics
  3. Cultural Studies8▲ 22×3 topics
  4. Migration8▲ 24×4 topics
  5. Nationalism8▲ 18×3 topics
  6. Ethnography8▲ 46×2 topics
  7. Innovation8▲ 7.5×10 topics
  8. Cultural Discourse7▲ 199×2 topics
  9. European Union7▲ 32×5 topics
  10. Literature7▲ 13×9 topics
  11. Polish history7▲ 284×1 topic
  12. Polish minority7▲ 284×1 topic
  13. Language6▲ 26×3 topics
  14. Culture6▲ 12×4 topics
  15. Pedagogy6▲ 13×3 topics
  16. Cultural Heritage6▲ 11×6 topics
  17. Cultural Identity6▲ 12×3 topics
  18. Sociolinguistics6▲ 33×3 topics
  19. Ethics5▲ 11×5 topics
  20. Ethnolinguistics5▲ 184×1 topic
  21. Multilingualism5▲ 34×1 topic
  22. Social Media5▲ 3.6×7 topics
  23. Urban Development5▲ 14×4 topics
  24. Social Sciences5▲ 33×2 topics
  25. Economic Development4▲ 5.7×5 topics
  26. Lifelong Learning4▲ 22×2 topics
  27. Media Literacy4▲ 8.3×1 topic
  28. Youth Development4▲ 47×1 topic
  29. Identity4▲ 5.9×6 topics
  30. Religion4▲ 9.3×8 topics
  31. Development4▲ 12×2 topics
  32. History4▲ 5.6×6 topics
  33. Geopolitics4▲ 25×3 topics
  34. Knowledge Management4▲ 6.9×4 topics
  35. Anthropology3▲ 37×2 topics
  36. Entrepreneurship3▲ 8.8×3 topics
  37. National Identity3▲ 30×2 topics
  38. Russia3▲ 81×2 topics
  39. Ukraine3▲ 99×2 topics
  40. Eastern European culture3▲ 256×1 topic

Which research topics does Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Polish Historical and Cultural Studies, Language and Culture, Education and Cultural Studies and Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland.

  1. 1 Polish Historical and Cultural Studies Political Science and International Relations 7 works
  2. 2 Language and Culture Linguistics and Language 5 works
  3. 3 Education and Cultural Studies Education 4 works
  4. 4 Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland History 3 works
  5. 5 Theology and Canon Law Studies Religious studies 3 works
  6. 6 Central European Literary Studies Anthropology 3 works
  7. 7 Catholicism, Bioethics, Media, Education Safety Research 3 works
  8. 8 Urban Development and Cultural Heritage Urban Studies 3 works
  9. 9 Polish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies Philosophy 2 works
  10. 10 Social Issues in Poland General Social Sciences 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available62.0%not open38.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors6.2%domestic only93.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 34% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00038% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych0.00055% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

still counting5%10%15%all institutions10.0% in 2025Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych8.0% in 20252020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 14.2% in 2024.

Other research institutions in Krakow

All research institutions in Krakow

Share Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych's ranking

Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych on Science Explorer

A card with Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Centrum Kopernika Badań Interdyscyplinarnych. Posts are plain text and can be reported.