Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Claremont · United States

Claremont Institute

claremont.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
112
▲ 19% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.1k
9.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
44%
world 40%
International
11%
world 18%
Claremont Institute

Not ranked overall: Claremont Institute is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Claremont Institute work in?

In 2022-now, 68% of research at Claremont Institute is in Social Sciences, 24% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Economics, Econometrics and Finance (29%), Social Sciences (20%), Arts and Humanities (14%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 14 fractional works · 67.8% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 6 fractional works · 28.7% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 3 fractional works · 12.2% of its workFinance: 2 fractional works · 11.3% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 5.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 20.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 9.2% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 5.7% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workArts and Humanities: 3 fractional works · 14.1% of its workPhilosophy: 2 fractional works · 11.7% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGeneral Decision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 5 fractional works · 24.4% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workAtmospheric Science: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workAlgebra and Number Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workApplied Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workTheoretical Computer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.0% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workComplementary and Manual Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPeriodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKClaremontInstitute21fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences24%Health Sciences7%Social Sciences68%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance628.7%
    2. Social Sciences420.3%
    3. Arts and Humanities314.1%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting13.4%
    5. Decision Sciences01.3%
    1. Computer Science15.5%
    2. Environmental Science15.5%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences13.1%
    4. Engineering13.1%
    5. Physics and Astronomy13.1%
    6. Mathematics02.3%
    7. Energy01.7%
    1. Health Professions13.7%
    2. Medicine01.9%
    3. Nursing00.8%
    4. Dentistry00.6%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 0.70× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2.00× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 1.85× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.21× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.10× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 2.00× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 1.41× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyDentistry: 1.29× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 1.41× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksMedicineNursing: 1.60× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 4.88× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.07× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.36× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 13.40× its world share, 6 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 1.61× its world share, 4 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 13.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 17 fields, with their numbers
  1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance13.40×6 works
  2. Arts and Humanities4.88×3 works
  3. Earth and Planetary Sciences2.00×1 works
  4. Mathematics2.00×0 works
  5. Energy1.85×0 works
  6. Social Sciences1.61×4 works
  7. Nursing1.60×0 works
  8. Physics and Astronomy1.41×1 works
  9. Health Professions1.41×1 works
  10. Decision Sciences1.36×0 works
  11. Dentistry1.29×0 works
  12. Environmental Science1.10×1 works
  13. Business, Management and Accounting1.07×1 works
  14. Computer Science0.70×1 works
  15. Engineering0.21×1 works
  16. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.15×0 works
  17. Medicine0.10×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Claremont Institute?

Ranked on the quality score, Ken Masugi and John C. Eastman lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Claremont Institute.

  1. 1 Ken Masugi United States · #2,267,750 worldwide 215 citations · 22 works
  2. 2 John C. Eastman United States · #7,097,538 worldwide 70 citations · 137 works
All ranked researchers at Claremont Institute

What are the most cited papers from Claremont Institute?

The most cited paper from Claremont Institute is "Charitable Giving by Married Couples" (James Andreoni, Eleanor Marie Lawrence Brown, Isaac Rischall, 2003), with 221 citations. Next come "Birth order and social behavior." (170) and "The Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on China's Financial Market and Macroeconomy" (89).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Charitable Giving by Married Couples James Andreoni, Eleanor Marie Lawrence Brown, Isaac Rischall · The Journal of Human Resources 2003 221
2 Birth order and social behavior. Jonathan R. Warren · Psychological Bulletin 1966 170
3 The Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on China's Financial Market and Macroeconomy Linyue Li, Thomas D. Willett, Nan Zhang · Economics Research International Open access 27 Mar 2012 89
4 A Longitudinal Analysis of Family Empowerment and Client Outcomes Miriam G. Resendez, Ryan Quist, Dumiso Matshazi · Journal of Child and Family Studies Dec 2000 86
5 Long waves, technological innovation, and relative decline William R. Thompson · International Organization 1990 82
All 62 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Claremont Institute?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Ethics, Economic Growth, Monetary Policy, Colonialism, Globalization, Hugo Grotius, Thomas Hobbes and Cultural Diplomacy.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 19 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 19 words, with their numbers
  1. Ethics2▲ 23×2 topics
  2. Economic Growth2▲ 14×10 topics
  3. Globalization2▲ 5.6×8 topics
  4. Monetary Policy2▲ 47×6 topics
  5. Colonialism2▲ 21×2 topics
  6. Hugo Grotius2▲ 1396×1 topic
  7. Thomas Hobbes2▲ 1396×1 topic
  8. Climate Change2▲ 2.7×5 topics
  9. Cultural Diplomacy1▲ 83×2 topics
  10. Environmental Ethics1▲ 96×3 topics
  11. Capital Flows1▲ 157×1 topic
  12. Financial Integration1▲ 187×1 topic
  13. Hallyu1▲ 193×1 topic
  14. Korean Wave1▲ 193×1 topic
  15. Liquidity1▲ 69×2 topics
  16. Conservation1▲ 11×2 topics
  17. Environmental Regulation1▲ 32×2 topics
  18. Global Warming1▲ 11×3 topics
  19. Panel Data Analysis1▲ 31×3 topics

Which research topics does Claremont Institute publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought, Global Financial Crisis and Policies, Asian Culture and Media Studies and Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution.

Seventeenth-Century Poli…2Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought: 2 fractional worksGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies: 1 fractional worksAsian Culture and Media Studies: 1 fractional worksEarth Systems and Cosmic Evolution: 1 fractional worksBanking stability, regulation, efficiency: 1 fractional worksMonetary Policy and Economic Impact: 1 fractional worksReligion, Ecology, and Ethics: 0 fractional worksSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life: 0 fractional worksEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics: 0 fractional worksDigital Education and Society: 0 fractional works
PhilosophyFinanceCultural StudiesAtmospheric Science5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought Philosophy 2 works
  2. 2 Global Financial Crisis and Policies Finance 1 works
  3. 3 Asian Culture and Media Studies Cultural Studies 1 works
  4. 4 Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution Atmospheric Science 1 works
  5. 5 Banking stability, regulation, efficiency Finance 1 works
  6. 6 Monetary Policy and Economic Impact General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 works
  7. 7 Religion, Ecology, and Ethics Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  8. 8 Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life Astronomy and Astrophysics 0 works
  9. 9 Environmental Philosophy and Ethics Nature and Landscape Conservation 0 works
  10. 10 Digital Education and Society Information Systems 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available44.3%not open55.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors11.4%domestic only88.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Claremont Institute's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 19% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Claremont Institute as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000097% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Claremont Institute0.00015% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Claremont Institute over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Claremont

All research institutions in Claremont

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Claremont Institute. Posts are plain text and can be reported.