Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Claremont · United States

TechnipFMC (United States)

In research, TechnipFMC (United States) stands highest in Physical Sciences (#8,299 of 17,446 worldwide), Engineering (#6,374 of 9,532 worldwide) and Ocean Engineering (#605 of 850 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Engineering (Engineering is 5.6× its share of world research).

World rank, all time
#23,100
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#4,795
of 7,310
Research works
377
▼ 8% vs 2018-21
Citations
3k
8.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.3%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.96×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
8%
world 40%
International
20%
world 18%

What is TechnipFMC (United States) known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Physical SciencesDomain #8,299 of 17,446 6.3%354
EngineeringField #6,374 of 9,532 6.4%299
Ocean EngineeringSubfield #605 of 850 7.9%171

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where TechnipFMC (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does TechnipFMC (United States) work in?

In 2022-now, 97% of research at TechnipFMC (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 1% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (84%), Materials Science (5%), Earth and Planetary Sciences (3%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 45 fractional works · 97.3% of its workEngineering: 39 fractional works · 84.0% of its workOcean Engineering: 18 fractional works · 39.1% of its workMechanical Engineering: 5 fractional works · 10.4% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 4 fractional works · 9.4% of its workComputational Mechanics: 3 fractional works · 7.4% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 3 fractional works · 7.1% of its workMechanics of Materials: 2 fractional works · 4.7% of its workAerospace Engineering: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Science: 2 fractional works · 5.0% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Materials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMetals and Alloys: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.3% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKTechnipFMC(United States)46fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences97%Health Sciences1%Social Sciences0%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering3984.0%
    2. Materials Science25.0%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences23.3%
    4. Computer Science11.9%
    5. Chemistry11.2%
    6. Environmental Science01.0%
    7. Energy00.5%
    8. Chemical Engineering00.3%
    9. Mathematics00.1%
    1. Medicine00.7%
    2. Dentistry00.4%
    3. Health Professions00.4%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.5%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.4%
    1. Social Sciences00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does TechnipFMC (United States) specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Engineering takes 5.6× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. EngineeringField · 38.6 works5.6×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Chemical Engineering: 0.82× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.76× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.24× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2.08× its world share, 2 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.58× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 5.60× its world share, 39 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 1.43× its world share, 2 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsDentistry: 0.75× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksMedicineSocial Sciences: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Engineering, 5.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 15 fields, with their numbers
  1. Engineering5.60×39 works
  2. Earth and Planetary Sciences2.08×2 works
  3. Materials Science1.43×2 works
  4. Chemical Engineering0.82×0 works
  5. Chemistry0.76×0 works
  6. Dentistry0.75×0 works
  7. Energy0.58×0 works
  8. Computer Science0.24×1 works
  9. Environmental Science0.21×0 works
  10. Health Professions0.14×0 works
  11. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.10×0 works
  12. Mathematics0.09×0 works
  13. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.08×0 works
  14. Medicine0.04×0 works
  15. Social Sciences0.03×0 works

Who are the top researchers at TechnipFMC (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Bonjun J. Koo, Jang Hwan Kim and Bernard R. McCoy lead among researchers whose main affiliation is TechnipFMC (United States).

  1. 1 Bonjun J. Koo United States · #1,831,164 worldwide 1.7k citations · 66 works
  2. 2 Jang Hwan Kim United States · #2,202,758 worldwide 857 citations · 70 works
  3. 3 Bernard R. McCoy United States · #2,722,359 worldwide 298 citations · 17 works
  4. 4 Djoni Eka Sidarta United States · #3,356,631 worldwide 545 citations · 26 works
  5. 5 Kostas F. Lambrakos United States · #3,604,175 worldwide 1.1k citations · 66 works
  6. 6 Mark Chang United States · #3,684,609 worldwide 110 citations · 24 works
  7. 7 Ho‐Joon Lim United States · #3,793,030 worldwide 627 citations · 37 works
  8. 8 Janardhan Davalath United States · #3,813,297 worldwide 313 citations · 21 works
  9. 9 Mayank Lal United States · #3,935,516 worldwide 50 citations · 17 works
  10. 10 Paul N. Stanton United States · #4,048,949 worldwide 173 citations · 25 works
All ranked researchers at TechnipFMC (United States)

What are the most cited papers from TechnipFMC (United States)?

The most cited paper from TechnipFMC (United States) is "A Novel Layer Jamming Mechanism With Tunable Stiffness Capability for Minimally Invasive Surgery" (Yong-Jae Kim, Shanbao Cheng, Sangbae Kim et al., 2013), with 431 citations. Next come "A Review of Recent Developments in Electrical Machine Design Optimization Methods With a Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor Benchmark Study" (335) and "Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts" (215).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A Novel Layer Jamming Mechanism With Tunable Stiffness Capability for Minimally Invasive Surgery Yong-Jae Kim, Shanbao Cheng, Sangbae Kim et al. · IEEE Transactions on Robotics 15 Apr 2013 431
2 A Review of Recent Developments in Electrical Machine Design Optimization Methods With a Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motor Benchmark Study Yao Duan, Dan M. Ionel · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 13 Mar 2013 335
3 Experimental Comparison of Three Floating Wind Turbine Concepts Andrew J. Goupee, Bonjun J. Koo, Richard W. Kimball et al. · Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 28 Oct 2013 215
4 Blind predictions of laboratory measurements of vortex-induced vibrations of a tension riser John R. Chaplin, Peter Bearman, Yu Cheng et al. · Journal of Fluids and Structures 27 Sep 2005 205
5 Model Tests for a Floating Wind Turbine on Three Different Floaters Bonjun J. Koo, Andrew J. Goupee, Richard W. Kimball et al. · Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 22 Mar 2014 175
All 58 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at TechnipFMC (United States)?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Renewable Energy, Oil and Gas, Subsea, Pipeline, Control Strategies, Power Take-Off, Wave Energy and Numerical Simulation.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Renewable Energy11▲ 16×3 topics
  2. Oil and Gas6▲ 395×1 topic
  3. Subsea6▲ 1478×1 topic
  4. Pipeline5▲ 97×3 topics
  5. Control Strategies4▲ 64×2 topics
  6. Power Take-Off4▲ 428×1 topic
  7. Wave Energy4▲ 428×1 topic
  8. Numerical Simulation4▲ 27×4 topics
  9. Sustainability3▲ 2.9×3 topics
  10. Finite Element Analysis3▲ 29×2 topics
  11. Environmental Impact3▲ 3.8×2 topics
  12. Fluid-Structure Interaction3▲ 44×2 topics
  13. Offshore Decommissioning3▲ 701×1 topic
  14. Ship Recycling3▲ 701×1 topic
  15. Corrosion3▲ 50×4 topics
  16. Machine Learning3▲ 1.73×3 topics
  17. Pitting Corrosion2▲ 99×2 topics
  18. Reliability Assessment2▲ 114×1 topic
  19. Risk Analysis2▲ 48×1 topic
  20. Seismic2▲ 88×1 topic
  21. Tunnel2▲ 58×1 topic
  22. Artificial Lift Systems2▲ 161×1 topic
  23. Fault Diagnosis2▲ 31×1 topic
  24. Remote Sensing2▲ 3.5×3 topics
  25. Heat Transfer2▲ 8.1×2 topics
  26. Flow Control2▲ 66×1 topic
  27. Turbulent Flow2▲ 31×2 topics
  28. Vortex-Induced Vibrations2▲ 106×1 topic
  29. Wave Modeling2▲ 63×2 topics
  30. SPH Method1▲ 104×1 topic
  31. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics1▲ 104×1 topic
  32. Coastal Dynamics1▲ 102×1 topic
  33. Sea-Level Rise1▲ 25×1 topic
  34. Finite Element Simulation1▲ 88×1 topic
  35. Fretting Wear1▲ 120×1 topic
  36. Ensemble Kalman Filter1▲ 23×1 topic
  37. High-Temperature Electronics1▲ 38×2 topics
  38. Thermal Management1▲ 7.1×2 topics
  39. Failure Analysis1▲ 25×4 topics
  40. Vibration Analysis1▲ 8.1×2 topics

Which research topics does TechnipFMC (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Offshore Engineering and Technologies, Wave and Wind Energy Systems, Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies and Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis.

  1. 1 Offshore Engineering and Technologies Ocean Engineering 6 works
  2. 2 Wave and Wind Energy Systems Ocean Engineering 4 works
  3. 3 Marine and Offshore Engineering Studies Ocean Engineering 3 works
  4. 4 Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis Mechanical Engineering 2 works
  5. 5 Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures Civil and Structural Engineering 2 works
  6. 6 Oil and Gas Production Techniques Ocean Engineering 2 works
  7. 7 Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis Computational Mechanics 2 works
  8. 8 Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions Computational Mechanics 1 works
  9. 9 Coastal and Marine Dynamics Earth-Surface Processes 1 works
  10. 10 Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis Mechanics of Materials 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available7.5%not open92.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors19.5%domestic only80.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has TechnipFMC (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 8% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is TechnipFMC (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00023% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%TechnipFMC (United States)0.00013% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of TechnipFMC (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

5%10%15%all institutions10.0% in 2015TechnipFMC (United States)4.6% in 20152010

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 10.2% in 2013.

Other research institutions in Claremont

All research institutions in Claremont

Share TechnipFMC (United States)'s ranking

TechnipFMC (United States) on Science Explorer

A card with TechnipFMC (United States)'s standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about TechnipFMC (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.