Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Sion · Switzerland

Clinique Romande de Réadaptation

In research, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation stands highest in Health Sciences (#6,624 of 16,688 worldwide) and Medicine (#7,208 of 14,558 worldwide), over all time.

crr-suva.ch/rehabilitation-clinic/welcome-sion-2.htmlROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#18,048
of 34,923
Rank in Switzerland
#211
of 378
Research works
253
▼ 18% vs 2018-21
Citations
4.7k
18.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.0%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.04×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
36%
world 40%
International
25%
world 18%
Clinique Romande de Réadaptation

What is Clinique Romande de Réadaptation known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Health SciencesDomain #6,624 of 16,688 6.4%186
MedicineField #7,208 of 14,558 6.9%151

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Clinique Romande de Réadaptation sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Clinique Romande de Réadaptation work in?

In 2022-now, 68% of research at Clinique Romande de Réadaptation is in Health Sciences, 21% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (60%), Neuroscience (18%), Health Professions (8%). It does 2.5× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 28 fractional works · 68.1% of its workMedicine: 24 fractional works · 60.0% of its workRehabilitation: 2 fractional works · 6.0% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 2 fractional works · 5.8% of its workPharmacology: 2 fractional works · 4.9% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 2 fractional works · 4.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workRheumatology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAnatomy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGastroenterology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workTransplantation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOphthalmology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 8.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 4.6% of its workOccupational Therapy: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workComplementary and Manual Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workLife Sciences: 9 fractional works · 21.3% of its workNeuroscience: 7 fractional works · 17.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 5 fractional works · 12.0% of its workNeurology: 2 fractional works · 5.2% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMicrobiology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.5% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 5.1% of its workMechanics of Materials: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKClinique Romandede Réadaptation41fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences21%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences68%Social Sciences5%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine2460.0%
    2. Health Professions38.1%
    1. Neuroscience717.7%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology13.0%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.7%
    1. Engineering25.1%
    2. Computer Science00.3%
    3. Materials Science00.1%
    1. Social Sciences12.8%
    2. Psychology12.1%
    3. Arts and Humanities00.1%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.56× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.68× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 10.89× its world share, 7 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.34× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringMaterials Science: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 3.08× its world share, 3 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.12× its world share, 24 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.05× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 0.68× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.22× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 10.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 12 fields, with their numbers
  1. Neuroscience10.89×7 works
  2. Medicine3.12×24 works
  3. Health Professions3.08×3 works
  4. Immunology and Microbiology0.68×0 works
  5. Psychology0.68×1 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.56×1 works
  7. Engineering0.34×2 works
  8. Social Sciences0.22×1 works
  9. Arts and Humanities0.05×0 works
  10. Computer Science0.04×0 works
  11. Materials Science0.04×0 works
  12. Business, Management and Accounting0.03×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Clinique Romande de Réadaptation?

Ranked on the quality score, Bertrand Léger, Charles Gobelet and O. Dériaz lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Clinique Romande de Réadaptation.

  1. 1 Bertrand Léger Switzerland · #1,220,443 worldwide 4.3k citations · 145 works
  2. 2 Charles Gobelet Switzerland · #1,507,187 worldwide 2.8k citations · 59 works
  3. 3 O. Dériaz Switzerland · #1,537,546 worldwide 4.8k citations · 126 works
  4. 4 Philippe Vuadens Switzerland · #1,640,063 worldwide 2.5k citations · 93 works
  5. 5 Fabienne Reynard Switzerland · #1,765,562 worldwide 736 citations · 24 works
  6. 6 Abdul Al-Khodairy Switzerland · #2,080,965 worldwide 1.4k citations · 34 works
  7. 7 Hong Phuoc Duong Switzerland · #2,602,168 worldwide 253 citations · 18 works
  8. 8 Andreas Mühl Switzerland · #3,046,159 worldwide 101 citations · 19 works
  9. 9 Philippe Vuistiner Switzerland · #3,297,225 worldwide 1.2k citations · 76 works
  10. 10 Gilles Rivier Switzerland · #3,328,522 worldwide 653 citations · 38 works
All ranked researchers at Clinique Romande de Réadaptation

What are the most cited papers from Clinique Romande de Réadaptation?

The most cited paper from Clinique Romande de Réadaptation is "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)" (Jean‐Pascal Lefaucheur et al., 2019), with 2,413 citations. Next come "Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review" (1,887) and "Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines" (1,364).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018) Jean‐Pascal Lefaucheur et al. · Clinical Neurophysiology Open access 31 Dec 2019 2,413
2 Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review Andreas Ernst Stuck, Jutta M Walthert, Thorsten Nikolaus et al. · Social Science & Medicine Review Feb 1999 1,887
3 Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines Andrea Antal et al. · Clinical Neurophysiology Open access 20 Jun 2017 1,364
4 Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke Andrea Biasiucci, R. Leeb, Iñaki Iturrate et al. · Nature Communications Open access 14 Jun 2018 644
5 Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper Hartwig Roman Siebner et al. · Clinical Neurophysiology Open access 18 May 2022 582
All 61 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Clinique Romande de Réadaptation?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Clinical Trials, Functional Recovery, Neural Plasticity, Functional Connectivity, Chronic Pain, Inflammation and Neuroprotection.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology8▲ 5.3×19 topics
  2. Clinical Trials4▲ 14×2 topics
  3. Functional Recovery4▲ 62×3 topics
  4. Inflammation4▲ 4.1×8 topics
  5. Neural Plasticity3▲ 45×2 topics
  6. Functional Connectivity3▲ 51×3 topics
  7. Chronic Pain3▲ 30×3 topics
  8. Neuroprotection2▲ 17×4 topics
  9. Psychological Factors2▲ 30×2 topics
  10. Neuromodulation2▲ 89×2 topics
  11. Recovery2▲ 54×2 topics
  12. Global Burden2▲ 10×4 topics
  13. Low Back Pain2▲ 34×3 topics
  14. Neurological Disorders2▲ 9.3×9 topics
  15. Physical Activity2▲ 11×3 topics
  16. Spinal Cord Injury2▲ 120×2 topics
  17. Neurological Classification2▲ 214×1 topic
  18. Disability2▲ 44×2 topics
  19. Health Status Questionnaires2▲ 62×1 topic
  20. Measurement Properties2▲ 62×1 topic
  21. Prevention2▲ 11×3 topics
  22. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation2▲ 147×1 topic
  23. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation2▲ 147×1 topic
  24. Neuropathic Pain2▲ 59×2 topics
  25. Constraint-Induced Therapy2▲ 50×1 topic
  26. Motor Recovery2▲ 50×1 topic
  27. Diagnostic Criteria2▲ 16×4 topics
  28. Risk Factors2▲ 3.4×4 topics
  29. Primary Care1▲ 9.3×3 topics
  30. Rehabilitation1▲ 8.5×8 topics
  31. Central Sensitization1▲ 52×2 topics
  32. Injury Prevention1▲ 26×2 topics
  33. Muscle Injuries1▲ 46×1 topic
  34. Pain Management1▲ 13×6 topics
  35. Palliative Care1▲ 20×3 topics
  36. Sports Injury1▲ 46×1 topic
  37. Healthcare Legislation1▲ 47×1 topic
  38. Patient Rights1▲ 38×1 topic
  39. Biomass1▲ 21×1 topic
  40. Neural Mechanisms1▲ 24×4 topics

Which research topics does Clinique Romande de Réadaptation publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Spinal Cord Injury Research, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery.

Spinal Cord Injury Resea…2Spinal Cord Injury Research: 2 fractional worksTranscranial Magnetic St…2Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies: 2 fractional worksMusculoskeletal pain and…2Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation: 2 fractional worksStroke Rehabilitation an…2Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: 2 fractional worksSports injuries and prevention: 1 fractional worksHealth, Medicine and Society: 1 fractional worksPain Management and Trea…1Pain Management and Treatment: 1 fractional worksForest Biomass Utilizati…1Forest Biomass Utilization and Management: 1 fractional worksVisual perception and pr…1Visual perception and processing mechanisms: 1 fractional worksFunctional Brain Connect…1Functional Brain Connectivity Studies: 1 fractional works
Pathology and Forensic MedicineNeurologyPharmacologyRehabilitation5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Spinal Cord Injury Research Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2 works
  2. 2 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies Neurology 2 works
  3. 3 Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Pharmacology 2 works
  4. 4 Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery Rehabilitation 2 works
  5. 5 Sports injuries and prevention Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1 works
  6. 6 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 1 works
  7. 7 Pain Management and Treatment Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1 works
  8. 8 Forest Biomass Utilization and Management Mechanics of Materials 1 works
  9. 9 Visual perception and processing mechanisms Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
  10. 10 Functional Brain Connectivity Studies Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available36.4%not open63.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors24.7%domestic only75.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Clinique Romande de Réadaptation's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 18% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Clinique Romande de Réadaptation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00015% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%Clinique Romande de Réadaptation0.00016% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Clinique Romande de Réadaptation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Sion

All research institutions in Sion

Share Clinique Romande de Réadaptation's ranking

Clinique Romande de Réadaptation on Science Explorer

A card with Clinique Romande de Réadaptation's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Clinique Romande de Réadaptation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.