Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation
In research, Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation stands highest in General Health Professions (#321 of 916 worldwide), Philosophy (#201 of 290 worldwide) and Health Professions (#1,341 of 1,928 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Philosophy, General Health Professions and Health Professions — Philosophy is 75.9× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #17,096 of 28,054 · #29,877 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,443 of 4,192
- Research works
- 2.5k ▲ 6969% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 1.3k 0.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 96% world 28%
What is Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Health ProfessionsSubfield | #321 of 916 | 0.0% | 1,527 | #1339 | |
| PhilosophySubfield | #201 of 290 | 0.0% | 763 | #759 | |
| Health ProfessionsField | #1,341 of 1,928 | 0.0% | 1,528 | #3402 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #8,392 of 11,982 | 0.0% | 1,534 | #17468 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #8,415 of 10,521 | 0.1% | 795 | #15398 | |
| Arts and HumanitiesField | #1,703 of 1,998 | 0.1% | 770 | #3568 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- General Health Professions#1,339 #321
- Philosophy#759 #201
- Health Professions#3,402 #1,341
- Health Sciences#17,468 #8,392
- Social Sciences#15,398 #8,415
- Arts and Humanities#3,568 #1,703
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Philosophy takes 75.9× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- PhilosophySubfield · 763.0 works76×
- General Health ProfessionsSubfield · 1,526.5 works47×
- Health ProfessionsField · 1,527.8 works25×
- Arts and HumanitiesField · 770.2 works11×
- Health SciencesDomain · 1,534.3 works2.9×
- Social SciencesDomain · 794.7 works1.4×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 24.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Health Professions 24.7×
- Arts and Humanities 11.4×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.0×
- Psychology 0.0×
- Computer Science 0.0×
- Environmental Science 0.0×
- Decision Sciences 0.0×
- Energy 0.0×
- Engineering 0.0×
- Medicine 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation?
Ranked on the composite score, Scott Arnold lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation.
- 1 Scott Arnold United States · #1,513,501 worldwide 12 citations · 19 works
Which keywords describe research at Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Healthcare, Mental Health, Identity, Quality of Life, Aging, History, Cultural Studies and Social Support.
- Technology Acceptance
- Media System
- Digital Healthcare Services
- Family Farming
- Caffeine
- Agroecology
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- Traditional Markets
- Urban Design
- Community Resilience
- Sustainable Development
- Local Wisdom
- Patient Rights
- Healthcare Legislation
- Caregiving
- Hermeneutics
- Narrative
- History
- Quality of Life
- Mental Health
- Healthcare
- Identity
- Aging
- Cultural Studies
- Social Support
- Public Health Policy
- Elderly
- Interpretation
- Philosophy
- Traditional Architecture
- Cultural Heritage
- Public Expenditure
- Cultural Diversity
- HIV/AIDS
- Agriculture
- Cognitive Performance
- Coffee
- Rural Policy
- Marketing Education
- News Consumption
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Healthcare767▲ 29×4 topics
- Mental Health764▲ 22×6 topics
- Identity764▲ 45×5 topics
- Quality of Life764▲ 23×5 topics
- Aging764▲ 61×4 topics
- History763▲ 46×4 topics
- Cultural Studies763▲ 86×2 topics
- Narrative763▲ 204×3 topics
- Social Support763▲ 59×2 topics
- Hermeneutics763▲ 395×2 topics
- Public Health Policy763▲ 115×2 topics
- Caregiving763▲ 438×1 topic
- Elderly763▲ 131×1 topic
- Healthcare Legislation763▲ 535×1 topic
- Interpretation763▲ 824×1 topic
- Patient Rights763▲ 435×1 topic
- Philosophy763▲ 74×1 topic
- Local Wisdom10▼ 0.84×4 topics
- Traditional Architecture9▲ 4.0×2 topics
- Sustainable Development6▼ 0.16×8 topics
- Cultural Heritage5▼ 0.41×5 topics
- Community Resilience5▲ 1.20×2 topics
- Public Expenditure5▲ 6.4×1 topic
- Urban Design5▲ 1.89×1 topic
- Cultural Diversity4▼ 0.83×1 topic
- Traditional Markets4▲ 3.6×1 topic
- HIV/AIDS3▲ 2.2×1 topic
- Sub-Saharan Africa3▲ 11×1 topic
- Agriculture3▼ 0.33×5 topics
- Agroecology2▼ 0.73×2 topics
- Cognitive Performance2◆ 0.89×2 topics
- Caffeine2▲ 5.0×1 topic
- Coffee2▲ 5.0×1 topic
- Family Farming2▲ 1.86×1 topic
- Rural Policy2▲ 1.86×1 topic
- Digital Healthcare Services1▲ 1.23×1 topic
- Marketing Education1▲ 5.5×1 topic
- Media System1▲ 2.1×1 topic
- News Consumption1▲ 2.1×1 topic
- Technology Acceptance1▲ 1.23×1 topic
Which research topics does Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Health, Medicine and Society, Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues, Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity and Architectural and Urban Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 763 works
- 2 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 763 works
- 3 Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity Philosophy 763 works
- 4 Architectural and Urban Studies Conservation 5 works
- 5 Cultural and Artistic Studies Cultural Studies 4 works
- 6 HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses Economics and Econometrics 3 works
- 7 Coffee research and impacts Pharmacology 2 works
- 8 SMEs Development and Digital Marketing Demography 2 works
- 9 Rural Development and Agriculture Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 2 works
- 10 Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence Marketing 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Comparative Aircraft Flight Efficiency Foundation's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 6969% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Sebastopol
- Advanced MRI Technologies (United States)
- Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees
- Public.Resource.Org
- Ag Innovations
- Derwen (United States)
- International Educational Foundation
- Sonoma West Medical Center
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.