Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Dijon · France

Crossject (France)

Research works
6
▲ 256% vs 2018-21
Citations
22
3.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
12.4%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
19%
world 40%
International
9%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Crossject (France) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Crossject (France) work in?

In all years, 60% of research at Crossject (France) is in Health Sciences, 31% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (44%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (19%), Veterinary (10%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 3 fractional works · 59.9% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 43.5% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 9.0% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 6.8% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 5.9% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 5.9% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workVeterinary: 1 fractional works · 10.4% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 5.9% of its workEquine: 0 fractional works · 4.5% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 5.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 5.9% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 31.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 18.5% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 1 fractional works · 9.9% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 7.6% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 9.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 5.9% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPharmaceutical Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysical Sciences: 0 fractional works · 5.2% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 5.2% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.6% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workALL ITS WORKCrossject(France)6fractional works, all years
Life Sciences31%Physical Sciences5%Health Sciences60%Social Sciences4%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 10 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine243.5%
    2. Veterinary110.4%
    3. Health Professions05.9%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences118.5%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology09.0%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology03.1%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.7%
    1. Computer Science05.2%
    1. Decision Sciences01.8%
    2. Psychology01.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 5.63× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2.51× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 1.52× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceMedicine: 1.04× its world share, 0 worksMedicineVeterinary: 147.69× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryDecision Sciences: 4.04× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 1.32× its world share, 0 worksPsychology1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 147.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Veterinary147.69×0 works
  2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences5.63×1 works
  3. Decision Sciences4.04×0 works
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.51×0 works
  5. Computer Science1.52×0 works
  6. Psychology1.32×0 works
  7. Medicine1.04×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Crossject (France)?

The most cited paper from Crossject (France) is "Efficacy of a Novel Prefilled, Single-Use, Needle-Free Device (Zeneo®) in Achieving Intramuscular Agent Delivery: An Observational Study" (Marc Bardou, Maxime Luu, Paul J. Walker et al., 2016), with 17 citations. Next come "Serological Characterization of Murine Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against Acquired B Red Cells" (12) and "Relative Bioavailability Study of Midazolam Intramuscularly Administered with the Needle-Free Auto-Injector ZENEO® in Healthy Adults" (7).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Efficacy of a Novel Prefilled, Single-Use, Needle-Free Device (Zeneo®) in Achieving Intramuscular Agent Delivery: An Observational Study Marc Bardou, Maxime Luu, Paul J. Walker et al. · Advances in Therapy Open access 7 Dec 2016 17
2 Serological Characterization of Murine Monoclonal Antibodies Directed against Acquired B Red Cells Daniel Janvier, S. Veaux, M. Reviron et al. · Vox Sanguinis Aug 1990 12
3 Relative Bioavailability Study of Midazolam Intramuscularly Administered with the Needle-Free Auto-Injector ZENEO® in Healthy Adults Olivier Lacombe, Yannick Plétan, Jean‐Marie Grouin et al. · Neurology and Therapy Open access 28 May 2024 7
4 Human factors study of ZENEO® (needle-free autoinjector) and comparison of different user instruction formats François‐André Allaert, Romain Schueller, Frederic Mabile et al. · Panminerva Medica May 2018 5
5 Detectability of use errors in summative usability tests of medical devices: Impact of the test environment Romaric Marcilly, Jessica Schiro, Michael J. Genin et al. · Applied Ergonomics Open access 12 Mar 2024 3
All 8 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Crossject (France) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Gut microbiota and health, Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques.

  1. 1 Animal Nutrition and Physiology Animal Science and Zoology 0 works
  2. 2 Gut microbiota and health Molecular Biology 0 works
  3. 3 Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies Small Animals 0 works
  4. 4 Pediatric Pain Management Techniques Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
  5. 5 Veterinary Equine Medical Research Equine 0 works
  6. 6 Intramuscular injections and effects Emergency Medicine 0 works
  7. 7 Reproductive Physiology in Livestock Agronomy and Crop Science 0 works
  8. 8 Pain Management and Opioid Use Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 0 works
  9. 9 Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology Agronomy and Crop Science 0 works
  10. 10 Recommender Systems and Techniques Information Systems 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available18.9%not open81.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors8.8%domestic only91.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Crossject (France)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 256% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Crossject (France) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000011% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%Crossject (France)0.000026% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Crossject (France) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Dijon

All research institutions in Dijon

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Crossject (France). Posts are plain text and can be reported.