Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Intramuscular injections and effects

Intramuscular injections and effects is a research topic within Emergency Medicine. Science Explorer counts 8.3k research works in it since 1950. 11.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the techniques, complications, and best practices related to intramuscular injections, particularly in the context of vaccine administration. It covers topics such as shoulder injuries, Nicolau Syndrome, injection site pain management, and the impact of injection techniques on immunogenicity and adverse reactions. The cluster also explores the challenges of administering intramuscular injections in specific populations, such as obese individuals and infants.

  • Intramuscular Injections
  • Vaccine Administration
  • Shoulder Injury
  • Nicolau Syndrome
  • Injection Technique
  • Subcutaneous Heparin
  • Immunogenicity
  • Pain Management
  • Gluteal Injections
  • Adverse Reactions
Research works
8.3k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
944
per year above
Top-10% rate
11.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+74%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Intramuscular injections and effects research?

By volume, the United States and India publish the most (318 and 191 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 318 works
  2. 2 India 191 works
  3. 3 Türkiye 106 works
  4. 4 China 71 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 62 works
  6. 6 Brazil 58 works
  7. 7 Russia 55 works
  8. 8 Japan 53 works
  9. 9 Spain 49 works
  10. 10 France 46 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 31.5%India: 18.9%Türkiye: 10.5%China: 7.1%6 others listed: 32.0%31%largest
United States318 · 31.5%India191 · 18.9%Türkiye106 · 10.5%China71 · 7.1%6 others listed323 · 32.0%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Intramuscular injections and effects research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Saveetha University publishes the most Intramuscular injections and effects research, followed by All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi.

Who are the leading researchers in Intramuscular injections and effects?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Intramuscular injections and effects include Elie A. Akl.

  1. 1 Elie A. Akl Canada 18k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Intramuscular injections and effects research done?

The largest centres of Intramuscular injections and effects research in 2022–2025 are Istanbul (Türkiye), Moscow (Russia), London (United Kingdom) and Chennai (India). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Istanbul.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Istanbul Türkiye 24 works
  2. 2 Moscow Russia 22 works
  3. 3 London United Kingdom 19 works
  4. 4 Chennai India 18 works
  5. 5 Tehran Iran 16 works
  6. 6 Paris France 14 works
  7. 7 Ankara Türkiye 14 works
  8. 8 Philadelphia United States 14 works
  9. 9 Tokyo Japan 13 works
  10. 10 New Delhi India 13 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. IstanbulTR · 24.3 works3.1×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Intramuscular injections and effects than the world average.

See Intramuscular injections and effects on the map

Is Intramuscular injections and effects research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 74% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2022. The fastest-growing topics are Intramuscular injections and effects.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.