Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Research facility · Kongens Lyngby · Denmark

DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium

Research works
7
▼ 43% vs 2018-21
Citations
1
0.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
82%
world 40%
International
22%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium work in?

In all years, 63% of research at DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium is in Social Sciences, 36% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (34%), Decision Sciences (27%), Social Sciences (21%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 5 fractional works · 63.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 27.0% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 2 fractional works · 22.3% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 4.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 20.5% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 9.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 1 fractional works · 9.4% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 12.8% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 9.4% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 35.9% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 34.4% of its workInformation Systems: 2 fractional works · 23.0% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 9.4% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workBiophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKDeiC - Danishe-infrastructure…7fractional works, all years
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences36%Social Sciences63%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 8 fields, with their numbers
    1. Decision Sciences227.0%
    2. Social Sciences120.5%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting112.8%
    4. Arts and Humanities02.9%
    1. Computer Science234.4%
    2. Engineering00.8%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.7%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Computer Science: 4.24× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.54× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringArts and Humanities: 1.27× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 5.07× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 19.33× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesSocial Sciences: 2.03× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 19.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 8 fields, with their numbers
  1. Decision Sciences19.33×1 works
  2. Business, Management and Accounting5.07×1 works
  3. Computer Science4.24×2 works
  4. Social Sciences2.03×1 works
  5. Arts and Humanities1.27×0 works
  6. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.54×0 works
  7. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.12×0 works
  8. Engineering0.07×0 works

Who are the top researchers at DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium?

Ranked on the quality score, Sandra Boerman lead among researchers whose main affiliation is DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium.

  1. 1 Sandra Boerman Denmark · #3,231,017 worldwide 0 citations · 15 works
All ranked researchers at DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium

What are the most cited papers from DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium?

The most cited paper from DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium is "Enabling Grid Services with Bidirectional EV Chargers: A Comparative Analysis of CCS2 and CHAdeMO Response Dynamics" (Kristoffer Laust Pedersen, Rasmus Meier Knudsen, Mattia Marinelli et al., 2025), with 2 citations. Next come "Initial Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)" (2) and "Second draft Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)" (2).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Enabling Grid Services with Bidirectional EV Chargers: A Comparative Analysis of CCS2 and CHAdeMO Response Dynamics Kristoffer Laust Pedersen, Rasmus Meier Knudsen, Mattia Marinelli et al. · Preprints.org PreprintOpen access 29 Oct 2025 2
2 Initial Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) Maggie Hellström, André Heughebaert, Rachael Kotarski et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) Open access 13 Dec 2019 2
3 Second draft Persistent Identifier (PID) policy for the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) Maggie Hellström, André Heughebaert, Rachael Kotarski et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) Open access May 2020 2
4 National supercomputing in Denmark L. K. Andersen, Bent Thage, Ali Syed et al. Conference paper May 2018 2
5 Expertise is the new infrastructure Pablo Hernández-Varas, Chiara Rossi, Erin M. Tranfield et al. · Journal of Microscopy Open access 6 May 2026 1
All 15 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Scientific Computing and Data Management, Digital Education and Society, Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods.

  1. 1 Scientific Computing and Data Management Information Systems and Management 1 works
  2. 2 Digital Education and Society Information Systems 1 works
  3. 3 Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development Management of Technology and Innovation 1 works
  4. 4 Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  5. 5 Open Source Software Innovations Computer Science Applications 1 works
  6. 6 Qualitative Research Methods and Applications Education 1 works
  7. 7 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 0 works
  8. 8 Optics and Image Analysis Management Information Systems 0 works
  9. 9 Academic Publishing and Open Access Information Systems and Management 0 works
  10. 10 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available82.5%not open17.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors22.0%domestic only78.0%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 43% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting20202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Kongens Lyngby

All research institutions in Kongens Lyngby

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about DeiC - Danish e-infrastructure Consortium. Posts are plain text and can be reported.