Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Maastricht · Netherlands

Health Foundation Limburg

Research works
29
fractional, all time
Citations
1.4k
48.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
20.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
17%
world 40%
International
8%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Health Foundation Limburg is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Health Foundation Limburg work in?

In all years, 59% of research at Health Foundation Limburg is in Health Sciences, 34% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (31%), Health Professions (28%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (12%). It does 2.1× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 17 fractional works · 59.2% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 31.2% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 2 fractional works · 6.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 5.4% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 4.7% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGastroenterology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Professions: 8 fractional works · 27.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 7 fractional works · 24.0% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 10 fractional works · 34.0% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3 fractional works · 11.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 3 fractional works · 11.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 11.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 7.9% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 7.7% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.8% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workALL ITS WORKHealth FoundationLimburg29fractional works, all years
Life Sciences4%Physical Sciences3%Health Sciences59%Social Sciences34%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 13 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine931.2%
    2. Health Professions827.7%
    3. Veterinary00.3%
    1. Economics, Econometrics and Finance311.8%
    2. Social Sciences311.1%
    3. Psychology27.7%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting12.9%
    5. Arts and Humanities00.6%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology12.1%
    2. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics01.2%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.6%
    1. Engineering12.3%
    2. Environmental Science00.6%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

    What are the most cited papers from Health Foundation Limburg?

    The most cited paper from Health Foundation Limburg is "EQUITY IN THE FINANCE AND DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE: SOME TENTATIVE CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISONS" (Adam Wagstaff, Eddy K.A. van Doorslaer, Pierella Paci, 1989), with 377 citations. Next come "Comparison of performance of four instruments in evaluating the effects of salmeterol on asthma quality of life" (193) and "Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation." (168).

    Most cited papers
    #PaperReleasedCitations
    1 EQUITY IN THE FINANCE AND DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE: SOME TENTATIVE CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISONS Adam Wagstaff, Eddy K.A. van Doorslaer, Pierella Paci · Oxford Review of Economic Policy Open access 1989 377
    2 Comparison of performance of four instruments in evaluating the effects of salmeterol on asthma quality of life Maureen Rutten‐van Mölken, Frank L. J. Custers, Eddy K.A. van Doorslaer et al. · European Respiratory Journal Open access Jun 1995 193
    3 Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation. Arie Dijkstra, Hein De Vries, Martijntje J. Bakker · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1996 168
    4 Variability and reliability of joint measurements Alphons M.P.M. Bovens, Marleen A. van Baak, Joseph G.P.M. Vrencken et al. · The American Journal of Sports Medicine 1990 134
    5 Openness to Discuss Cancer in the Nuclear Family Ilse Mesters, H van den Borne, Laura J. McCormick et al. · Psychosomatic Medicine 1997 132
    All 46 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

    Which keywords describe research at Health Foundation Limburg?

    By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Quality of Life, Quality Improvement, Primary Care, Cost-effectiveness Analysis, Health Utility Measures, Global Burden, Clinical Trials and Health Care Utilization.

    ▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

    Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 24 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

    All 24 words, with their numbers
    1. Quality of Life3▲ 7.8×5 topics
    2. Epidemiology2▲ 2.2×11 topics
    3. Quality Improvement2▲ 39×5 topics
    4. Cost-effectiveness Analysis2▲ 95×1 topic
    5. Health Utility Measures2▲ 95×1 topic
    6. Primary Care2▲ 17×4 topics
    7. Global Burden2▲ 11×5 topics
    8. Clinical Trials2▲ 8.4×4 topics
    9. Risk Factors2▲ 4.9×6 topics
    10. Health Care Utilization1▲ 37×2 topics
    11. Public Health1▲ 3.6×5 topics
    12. Chronic Disease1▲ 27×2 topics
    13. Health Care Spending1▲ 69×1 topic
    14. Insurance Markets1▲ 69×1 topic
    15. Health Outcomes1▲ 19×2 topics
    16. Ageing Population1▲ 100×1 topic
    17. Health Care Expenditure1▲ 100×1 topic
    18. Health Promotion1▲ 14×3 topics
    19. Healthcare Quality1▲ 32×2 topics
    20. Patient-Centered Care1▲ 60×1 topic
    21. Physician Communication1▲ 158×1 topic
    22. Adolescents1▲ 10×2 topics
    23. Depression1▲ 4.7×4 topics
    24. Immunotherapy1▲ 5.4×2 topics

    Which research topics does Health Foundation Limburg publish most on?

    By volume: Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Healthcare Policy and Management, Global Health Care Issues and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare.

    1. 1 Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Economics and Econometrics 2 works
    2. 2 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 1 works
    3. 3 Global Health Care Issues General Health Professions 1 works
    4. 4 Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare General Health Professions 1 works
    5. 5 Healthcare cost, quality, practices General Health Professions 1 works
    6. 6 Behavioral Health and Interventions Applied Psychology 1 works
    7. 7 Social and Intergroup Psychology Sociology and Political Science 1 works
    8. 8 Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare General Health Professions 1 works
    9. 9 Family Support in Illness Sociology and Political Science 1 works
    10. 10 Public Health Policies and Education General Health Professions 0 works

    How open and international is its research?

    Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

    openly available16.7%not open83.3%

    World: 40% of research is openly available.

    with international co-authors7.8%domestic only92.2%

    World: 18% is written across borders.

    How has Health Foundation Limburg's research output changed?

    198519901995
    grewheldshrank

    The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

    Its share of all research

    Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Health Foundation Limburg as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000096% in 1997.

    0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Health Foundation Limburg0.000023% in 19981990

    Fractional works of Health Foundation Limburg over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

    Other research institutions in Maastricht

    All research institutions in Maastricht

    Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

    Discussion

    Ask a question or share a note about Health Foundation Limburg. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.