Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Human Rights Campaign

Research works
22
▼ 74% vs 2013–17
Citations
89
4.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
72.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
31%
world 28%

Not ranked overall: Human Rights Campaign is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Health Professions: 8.03× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.96× its world share, 1 worksMedicineNursing: 5.08× its world share, 0 worksNursingEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 4.36× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 7.79× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.97× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 8.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

Which keywords describe research at Human Rights Campaign?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Discrimination, Gender Identity, Intersectionality, Health Disparities, LGBTQ+, Stigma and Human Rights.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 19 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 19 words, with their numbers
  1. Mental Health5▲ 20×7 topics
  2. Discrimination5▲ 144×2 topics
  3. Gender Identity4▲ 199×2 topics
  4. Health Disparities4▲ 97×3 topics
  5. Intersectionality4▲ 141×2 topics
  6. LGBTQ+4▲ 739×1 topic
  7. Stigma4▲ 172×1 topic
  8. Human Rights3▲ 14×8 topics
  9. Genetics2▲ 8.8×2 topics
  10. Climate Change1▲ 2.3×2 topics
  11. Gender1▲ 10×4 topics
  12. Primary Care1▲ 13×4 topics
  13. Social Justice1▲ 12×4 topics
  14. Environmental Law1▲ 38×3 topics
  15. Epidemiology1▲ 1.30×8 topics
  16. Quality of Life1▲ 3.8×3 topics
  17. Criminal Justice1▲ 29×2 topics
  18. Grapevine1▲ 106×1 topic
  19. Wine Quality1▲ 122×1 topic

Which research topics does Human Rights Campaign publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Healthcare Policy and Management and Political Conflict and Governance.

  1. 1 LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy Social Psychology 1 works
  2. 2 Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare General Health Professions 0 works
  3. 3 Healthcare Policy and Management Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  4. 4 Political Conflict and Governance Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  5. 5 Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes General Health Professions 0 works
  6. 6 Gender Roles and Identity Studies Gender Studies 0 works
  7. 7 Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 0 works
  8. 8 Diversity and Career in Medicine Gender Studies 0 works
  9. 9 Sex and Gender in Healthcare Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  10. 10 Cultural Competency in Health Care Sociology and Political Science 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available30.6%not open69.4%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors11.2%domestic only88.8%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Human Rights Campaign's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 74% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Washington D.C.

All research institutions in Washington D.C.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.