Imagination Technologies (United Kingdom)
- Research works
- 88 ▲ 5% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 904 10.3 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 35% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Imagination Technologies (United Kingdom) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 12.2×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Veterinary 12.2×
- Psychology 5.3×
- Mathematics 4.2×
- Arts and Humanities 2.7×
- Computer Science 2.2×
- Social Sciences 2.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.6×
- Neuroscience 1.5×
- Chemistry 1.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.9×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.9×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.8×
- Environmental Science 0.7×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Health Professions 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
Which keywords describe research at Imagination Technologies (United Kingdom)?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Positive Psychology, Leadership, Courage, Heroism, Child Development, Health Behavior, Deep Learning and Digital Technology.
- Optimism
- Hope Theory
- Ancient Rome
- Health Behavior
- Digital Technology
- Heroism
- Leadership
- Deep Learning
- Positive Psychology
- Machine Learning
- Courage
- Child Development
- Education
- Parental Mediation
- Greek Literature
- Multilinear Algebra
- Tensor Decomposition
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 17 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 17 words, with their numbers
- Positive Psychology2▲ 132×2 topics
- Deep Learning2▲ 2.6×10 topics
- Machine Learning2▲ 2.2×4 topics
- Leadership1▲ 14×2 topics
- Courage1▲ 512×1 topic
- Heroism1▲ 512×1 topic
- Child Development1▲ 14×2 topics
- Digital Technology1▲ 52×1 topic
- Education1▲ 3.2×4 topics
- Health Behavior1▲ 55×2 topics
- Parental Mediation1▲ 101×1 topic
- Ancient Rome1▲ 151×1 topic
- Greek Literature1▲ 151×1 topic
- Hope Theory1▲ 227×1 topic
- Multilinear Algebra1▲ 549×1 topic
- Optimism1▲ 227×1 topic
- Tensor Decomposition1▲ 549×1 topic
Which research topics does Imagination Technologies (United Kingdom) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies, Child Development and Digital Technology, Optimism, Hope, and Well-being and Classical Antiquity Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies Social Psychology 1 works
- 2 Child Development and Digital Technology Education 1 works
- 3 Optimism, Hope, and Well-being Applied Psychology 1 works
- 4 Classical Antiquity Studies Anthropology 1 works
- 5 Tensor decomposition and applications Computational Mathematics 1 works
- 6 Creativity in Education and Neuroscience Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
- 7 Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies Obstetrics and Gynecology 0 works
- 8 African history and culture studies Anthropology 0 works
- 9 Advanced Vision and Imaging Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
- 10 Race, History, and American Society Sociology and Political Science 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Imagination Technologies (United Kingdom)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 5% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Kings Langley
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.