Institute For Defense Analyses
In research, Institute For Defense Analyses stands highest in Physical Sciences (#5,990 of 17,446 worldwide), Computer Science (#2,514 of 6,336 worldwide) and Engineering (#3,958 of 9,532 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #7,922 of 34,923
- Rank in United States
- #1,650 of 7,310
- Research works
- 1.4k ▼ 40% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 28k 20.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 7.5% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.93× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 18% world 40%
- International
- 6% world 18%
What is Institute For Defense Analyses known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #5,990 of 17,446 | 10.7% | 933 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #2,514 of 6,336 | 10.0% | 299 | |
| EngineeringField | #3,958 of 9,532 | 11.6% | 332 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,507 of 14,833 | 10.1% | 361 | |
| Social SciencesField | #7,133 of 9,330 | 10.0% | 165 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute For Defense Analyses sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which fields of science does Institute For Defense Analyses work in?
In 2022-now, 62% of research at Institute For Defense Analyses is in Physical Sciences, 27% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Computer Science (21%), Engineering (17%), Mathematics (14%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Physical Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
- Physical Sciences3661.9%
- Computer Science1220.7%
- Engineering1016.6%
- Mathematics813.6%
- Physics and Astronomy47.0%
- Energy11.1%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences11.0%
- Materials Science11.0%
- Environmental Science10.9%
- Social Sciences1526.8%
- Life Sciences35.8%
- Health Sciences35.6%
- Medicine23.3%
- Health Professions12.2%
- Nursing00.1%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Mathematics, 11.5×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 20 fields, with their numbers
- Mathematics11.54×8 works
- Decision Sciences3.58×2 works
- Physics and Astronomy3.13×4 works
- Computer Science2.66×12 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.04×2 works
- Neuroscience1.28×1 works
- Energy1.19×1 works
- Psychology1.13×2 works
- Engineering1.11×10 works
- Social Sciences1.07×8 works
- Health Professions0.82×1 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.66×1 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.60×2 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.57×0 works
- Arts and Humanities0.33×1 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.30×1 works
- Materials Science0.28×1 works
- Environmental Science0.18×0 works
- Medicine0.17×2 works
- Nursing0.17×0 works
- Mathematics 11.5×
- Decision Sciences 3.6×
- Physics and Astronomy 3.1×
- Computer Science 2.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.0×
- Neuroscience 1.3×
- Energy 1.2×
- Psychology 1.1×
- Engineering 1.1×
- Social Sciences 1.1×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.6×
- Arts and Humanities 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.3×
- Materials Science 0.3×
- Environmental Science 0.2×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Nursing 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Institute For Defense Analyses?
Ranked on the quality score, Kevin M. Woods, Arthur S. House and Leonard E. Baum lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute For Defense Analyses.
- 1
Kevin M. Woods
United States · #303,724 worldwide 1.9k citations · 181 works
- 2
Arthur S. House
United States · #379,946 worldwide 4.3k citations · 63 works
- 3
Leonard E. Baum
United States · #804,490 worldwide 11k citations · 29 works
- 4
Neal Zierler
United States · #1,050,757 worldwide 1.6k citations · 39 works
- 5
David P. Robbins
United States · #1,056,775 worldwide 1.6k citations · 67 works
- 6
Thomas H. Crystal
United States · #1,366,651 worldwide 1.8k citations · 41 works
- 7
David M. Goldschmidt
United States · #1,425,961 worldwide 1k citations · 45 works
- 8
Stephanie M. Burchard
United States · #1,476,176 worldwide 569 citations · 27 works
- 9
Nathan Platt
United States · #1,666,466 worldwide 2.2k citations · 54 works
- 10
Edgar T. Irons
United States · #1,680,459 worldwide 607 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at Institute For Defense Analyses?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Machine Learning, Tropical Geometry, Symplectic Geometry, Security, International Law, Deep Learning, Gromov-Witten Theory and Moduli Theory.
- Video Analysis
- Space Tourism
- Resource Allocation
- Number Theory
- Mobile Robots
- Human Rights
- Big Data
- Global Governance
- Trust
- Outlier Detection
- Hom-Lie Algebras
- Deformations
- Sustainability
- Moduli Theory
- Data Analysis
- International Law
- Tropical Geometry
- Neural Networks
- Deep Learning
- Machine Learning
- Globalization
- Security
- Symplectic Geometry
- Social Media
- Gromov-Witten Theory
- Anomaly Detection
- Time Series
- High-Dimensional Data
- On-Orbit Servicing
- Space Debris
- Complex Adaptive Systems
- Surveillance
- Governance
- Identity
- Modular Forms
- Online Algorithms
- Space Policy
- Unsupervised
- Vulnerability
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 39 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 39 words, with their numbers
- Machine Learning5▲ 2.5×21 topics
- Deep Learning3▲ 1.71×10 topics
- Globalization3▲ 2.3×8 topics
- Neural Networks2▲ 2.4×3 topics
- Security2▲ 5.1×5 topics
- Tropical Geometry2▲ 103×2 topics
- Symplectic Geometry2▲ 79×2 topics
- International Law2▲ 8.6×4 topics
- Social Media2▲ 2.1×4 topics
- Data Analysis1▲ 9.5×4 topics
- Gromov-Witten Theory1▲ 129×1 topic
- Moduli Theory1▲ 129×1 topic
- Anomaly Detection1▲ 8.1×2 topics
- Sustainability1◆ 0.90×6 topics
- Time Series1▲ 13×2 topics
- Deformations1▲ 86×1 topic
- High-Dimensional Data1▲ 13×2 topics
- Hom-Lie Algebras1▲ 86×1 topic
- On-Orbit Servicing1▲ 90×1 topic
- Outlier Detection1▲ 16×2 topics
- Space Debris1▲ 90×1 topic
- Trust1▲ 7.5×5 topics
- Complex Adaptive Systems1▲ 63×2 topics
- Global Governance1▲ 8.0×2 topics
- Surveillance1▲ 6.9×2 topics
- Big Data1▲ 1.86×3 topics
- Governance1▲ 5.3×2 topics
- Human Rights1▲ 1.69×2 topics
- Identity1▲ 2.4×2 topics
- Mobile Robots1▲ 18×1 topic
- Modular Forms1▲ 46×2 topics
- Number Theory1▲ 72×2 topics
- Online Algorithms1▲ 101×1 topic
- Resource Allocation1▲ 10×2 topics
- Space Policy1▲ 122×1 topic
- Space Tourism1▲ 122×1 topic
- Unsupervised1▲ 16×1 topic
- Video Analysis1▲ 14×1 topic
- Vulnerability1▲ 7.5×2 topics
Which research topics does Institute For Defense Analyses publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory, Space Satellite Systems and Control, Advanced Topics in Algebra and Space exploration and regulation.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory Geometry and Topology 1 works
- 2 Space Satellite Systems and Control Aerospace Engineering 1 works
- 3 Advanced Topics in Algebra Algebra and Number Theory 1 works
- 4 Space exploration and regulation Astronomy and Astrophysics 1 works
- 5 Optimization and Search Problems Computer Networks and Communications 1 works
- 6 Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 7 Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life Astronomy and Astrophysics 1 works
- 8 Analytic Number Theory Research Algebra and Number Theory 1 works
- 9 Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence 1 works
- 10 Technology and Data Analysis Information Systems 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Institute For Defense Analyses's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 40% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Institute For Defense Analyses as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00032% in 2024.
Fractional works of Institute For Defense Analyses over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 15.0% in 1998.
Other research institutions in Alexandria
- U.S. National Science Foundation
- Job Performance Systems (United States)
- Public Risk Management Association
- National Society of Professional Engineers
- American Physical Therapy Association
- American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
- Samueli Institute
- American Rock Mechanics Association
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Institute For Defense Analyses. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
