Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

• Environmental Science 8.6×
• Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4.6×
• Earth and Planetary Sciences 4.6×
• Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3.5×
• Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
• Engineering 0.5×
• Social Sciences 0.1×

Ranked on the composite score, Emil Cienciala lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research.

1. 1 🇨🇿 Emil Cienciala Czechia · #716,473 worldwide 108 citations · 24 works

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Biomass Estimation, Aboveground Biomass, Allometric Models, Carbon Stocks, Biodiversity Conservation, Forest Management and Ecosystem Resilience.

By volume in 2022–2025: Forest ecology and management, Forest Management and Policy, Entomological Studies and Ecology and Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies.

1. 1 Forest ecology and management Nature and Landscape Conservation 1 works
2. 2 Forest Management and Policy Global and Planetary Change 1 works
3. 3 Entomological Studies and Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1 works
4. 4 Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies Genetics 1 works
5. 5 Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies Insect Science 1 works
6. 6 Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy Genetics 0 works
7. 7 Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications Environmental Engineering 0 works
8. 8 Forest Biomass Utilization and Management Mechanics of Materials 0 works
9. 9 Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography Paleontology 0 works
10. 10 Tree Root and Stability Studies Mechanical Engineering 0 works

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

Output in 2018–2022 was 25% higher than in 2013–2017.

• BIOPHARM (Czechia)