Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
University · Kortrijk · Belgium

Katholieke Hogeschool Vives

In research, Katholieke Hogeschool Vives stands highest in Social Sciences (#5,930 of 14,833 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, 2022-now
#16,952
of 22,385 · #16,083 all time
Rank in Belgium
#75
of 105
Research works
247
▲ 113% vs 2018-21
Citations
3k
12.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.99×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
67%
world 40%
International
31%
world 18%

What is Katholieke Hogeschool Vives known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #5,930 of 14,833 6.8%145

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Katholieke Hogeschool Vives sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Katholieke Hogeschool Vives work in?

In 2022-now, 59% of research at Katholieke Hogeschool Vives is in Social Sciences, 19% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (27%), Arts and Humanities (19%), Health Professions (9%). It does 2.2× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 54 fractional works · 59.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 25 fractional works · 26.9% of its workEducation: 8 fractional works · 8.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 6 fractional works · 6.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 5 fractional works · 5.6% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workCommunication: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLaw: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 17 fractional works · 18.6% of its workPhilosophy: 8 fractional works · 8.7% of its workReligious studies: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workHistory: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workClassics: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPsychology: 7 fractional works · 7.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.7% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3 fractional works · 3.0% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workFinance: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 2 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Sciences: 17 fractional works · 18.6% of its workHealth Professions: 8 fractional works · 8.5% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 6 fractional works · 6.5% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMedicine: 7 fractional works · 7.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 3 fractional works · 3.8% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workVeterinary: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSmall Animals: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workResearch and Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 11 fractional works · 12.4% of its workComputer Science: 4 fractional works · 4.3% of its workComputer Science Applications: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 3.5% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEnergy: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 1.7% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 9 fractional works · 9.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 6 fractional works · 6.8% of its workInsect Science: 3 fractional works · 3.2% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 1 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workVirology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workALL ITS WORKKatholiekeHogeschool Vives92fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences10%Physical Sciences12%Health Sciences19%Social Sciences59%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 23 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences2526.9%
    2. Arts and Humanities1718.6%
    3. Psychology77.4%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance33.0%
    5. Decision Sciences21.9%
    6. Business, Management and Accounting11.4%
    1. Health Professions88.5%
    2. Medicine77.9%
    3. Veterinary11.6%
    4. Nursing00.5%
    1. Computer Science44.3%
    2. Environmental Science33.5%
    3. Energy22.1%
    4. Engineering21.7%
    5. Materials Science00.4%
    6. Chemical Engineering00.1%
    7. Chemistry00.1%
    8. Mathematics00.1%
    9. Physics and Astronomy00.0%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences66.8%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology21.9%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology10.8%
    4. Neuroscience00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.43× its world share, 6 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.35× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.78× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.28× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemical Engineering: 0.35× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringChemistry: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.55× its world share, 4 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 2.32× its world share, 2 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.11× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.71× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 3.24× its world share, 8 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.41× its world share, 7 worksMedicineNursing: 1.08× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 11.87× its world share, 2 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 6.45× its world share, 17 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.43× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.96× its world share, 2 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.38× its world share, 3 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.44× its world share, 7 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.13× its world share, 25 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Veterinary, 11.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 22 fields, with their numbers
  1. Veterinary11.87×2 works
  2. Arts and Humanities6.45×17 works
  3. Health Professions3.24×8 works
  4. Psychology2.44×7 works
  5. Energy2.32×2 works
  6. Social Sciences2.13×25 works
  7. Decision Sciences1.96×2 works
  8. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.43×6 works
  9. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.38×3 works
  10. Nursing1.08×0 works
  11. Immunology and Microbiology0.78×1 works
  12. Environmental Science0.71×3 works
  13. Computer Science0.55×4 works
  14. Business, Management and Accounting0.43×1 works
  15. Medicine0.41×7 works
  16. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.35×2 works
  17. Chemical Engineering0.35×0 works
  18. Neuroscience0.28×0 works
  19. Engineering0.11×2 works
  20. Materials Science0.10×0 works
  21. Chemistry0.08×0 works
  22. Mathematics0.06×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Katholieke Hogeschool Vives?

Ranked on the quality score, Ilse Delbaere, Yves Sagaert and Eduardo M. Torner lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Katholieke Hogeschool Vives.

  1. 1 Ilse Delbaere Belgium · #987,483 worldwide 1.6k citations · 86 works
  2. 2 Yves Sagaert Belgium · #2,274,210 worldwide 158 citations · 25 works
  3. 3 Eduardo M. Torner Belgium · #3,220,783 worldwide 9 citations · 19 works
  4. 4 Kristof Van De Keere Belgium · #4,011,177 worldwide 157 citations · 30 works
  5. 5 Julián Espada Rodríguez Belgium · #4,493,691 worldwide 1 citations · 20 works
  6. 6 Bernt T. Oftestad Belgium · #4,502,372 worldwide 26 citations · 45 works
  7. 7 Stephanie Vervaet Belgium · #4,517,323 worldwide 94 citations · 32 works
  8. 8 Henk Vandaele Belgium · #5,381,488 worldwide 0 citations · 49 works
  9. 9 Bart Debyser Belgium · #5,484,010 worldwide 491 citations · 60 works
All ranked researchers at Katholieke Hogeschool Vives

What are the most cited papers from Katholieke Hogeschool Vives?

The most cited paper from Katholieke Hogeschool Vives is "Neutrophil extracellular trap cell death requires both autophagy and superoxide generation" (Quinten Remijsen, Tom Vanden Berghe, Ellen Wirawan et al., 2010), with 824 citations. Next come "The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning" (699) and "Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education" (272).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Neutrophil extracellular trap cell death requires both autophagy and superoxide generation Quinten Remijsen, Tom Vanden Berghe, Ellen Wirawan et al. · Cell Research Open access 9 Nov 2010 824
2 The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning Johan Desmet, Marc De Maeyer, Bart Hazes et al. · Nature Apr 1992 699
3 Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education Bram Bruggeman, Jo Tondeur, Katrien Struyven et al. · The Internet and Higher Education Open access 26 Sep 2020 272
4 Impact of firm heterogeneity on direct and spillover effects of FDI: Micro-evidence from ten transition countries Jože P. Damijan, Matija Rojec, Boris Majcen et al. · Journal of Comparative Economics 28 Dec 2012 243
5 Peer workers’ perceptions and experiences of barriers to implementation of peer worker roles in mental health services: A literature review Joeri Vandewalle, Bart Debyser, Dimitri Beeckman et al. · International Journal of Nursing Studies Open access 11 May 2016 231
All 62 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Katholieke Hogeschool Vives?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Ethics, Democracy, Education, Inclusion, Human Rights, Constitutionalism, Religion and Philosophy.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Education6▲ 4.0×17 topics
  2. Ethics6▲ 12×12 topics
  3. Human Rights5▲ 5.5×7 topics
  4. Democracy5▲ 15×5 topics
  5. Sustainability5▲ 2.2×11 topics
  6. Inclusion4▲ 34×2 topics
  7. Mental Health4▲ 3.0×13 topics
  8. Constitutionalism4▲ 48×2 topics
  9. Religion4▲ 9.0×9 topics
  10. Globalization4▲ 2.0×11 topics
  11. Philosophy4▲ 8.8×8 topics
  12. Cultural Diversity4▲ 17×3 topics
  13. European Legal Systems4▲ 110×1 topic
  14. Judicial Review4▲ 45×1 topic
  15. Health Promotion3▲ 12×4 topics
  16. Research Methods3▲ 22×1 topic
  17. Social Work3▲ 52×1 topic
  18. History3▲ 4.7×8 topics
  19. Theology3▲ 36×3 topics
  20. Educational Technology3▲ 2.7×8 topics
  21. Identity3▲ 4.3×5 topics
  22. Embodiment3▲ 16×3 topics
  23. Literature3▲ 5.4×8 topics
  24. Secularism3▲ 28×4 topics
  25. Citizenship2▲ 19×4 topics
  26. Mediatization2▲ 43×2 topics
  27. Biblical Monotheism2▲ 86×1 topic
  28. Jewish Society2▲ 86×1 topic
  29. Multiculturalism2▲ 12×3 topics
  30. Patient Outcomes2▲ 35×3 topics
  31. Tacit Knowledge2▲ 47×2 topics
  32. Consumer Acceptance2▲ 35×2 topics
  33. Social Change2▲ 17×5 topics
  34. Animal Feed2▲ 63×1 topic
  35. Digital Religion2▲ 138×1 topic
  36. Diversity2▲ 11×3 topics
  37. Edible Insects2▲ 63×1 topic
  38. Internet2▲ 25×1 topic
  39. Phenomenology2▲ 18×3 topics
  40. Animal Welfare2▲ 21×3 topics

Which research topics does Katholieke Hogeschool Vives publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: European and International Law Studies, Dutch Social and Cultural Studies, Biblical Studies and Interpretation and Insect Utilization and Effects.

  1. 1 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 4 works
  2. 2 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 3 works
  3. 3 Biblical Studies and Interpretation Religious studies 2 works
  4. 4 Insect Utilization and Effects Insect Science 2 works
  5. 5 Media, Religion, Digital Communication Philosophy 2 works
  6. 6 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 2 works
  7. 7 Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Developmental and Educational Psychology 2 works
  8. 8 Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 2 works
  9. 9 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
  10. 10 Religious Education and Schools Education 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available66.8%not open33.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors30.6%domestic only69.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Katholieke Hogeschool Vives's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 113% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Katholieke Hogeschool Vives as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00019% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Katholieke Hogeschool Vives0.00042% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Katholieke Hogeschool Vives over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Kortrijk

All research institutions in Kortrijk

Share Katholieke Hogeschool Vives's ranking

Katholieke Hogeschool Vives on Science Explorer

A card with Katholieke Hogeschool Vives's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Katholieke Hogeschool Vives. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.