Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Mill · Netherlands

Kliniek ViaSana

Research works
61
▼ 15% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.2k
20.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
14.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
53%
world 40%
International
34%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Kliniek ViaSana is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Kliniek ViaSana work in?

In all years, 85% of research at Kliniek ViaSana is in Health Sciences, 7% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (82%), Psychology (3%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (3%). It does 3.2× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 52 fractional works · 85.0% of its workMedicine: 50 fractional works · 81.8% of its workSurgery: 23 fractional works · 37.6% of its workRheumatology: 3 fractional works · 5.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 3 fractional works · 5.2% of its workEpidemiology: 3 fractional works · 4.8% of its workDermatology: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workOncology: 2 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 2 fractional works · 3.0% of its workPhysiology: 2 fractional works · 2.7% of its workUrology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workRehabilitation: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPharmacology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInternal Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOral Surgery: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 4 fractional works · 6.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workInsect Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMicrobiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 4.7% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSurfaces, Coatings and Films: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKKliniek ViaSana61fractional works, all years
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences4%Health Sciences85%Social Sciences5%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine5081.8%
    2. Health Professions12.1%
    3. Dentistry11.1%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology22.5%
    2. Neuroscience11.4%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences11.4%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology11.2%
    5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.1%
    1. Psychology23.4%
    2. Social Sciences00.7%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.3%
    4. Arts and Humanities00.1%
    5. Decision Sciences00.1%
    1. Engineering12.1%
    2. Environmental Science10.9%
    3. Materials Science00.6%
    4. Chemical Engineering00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.42× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.51× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.46× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemical Engineering: 0.83× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringEngineering: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.37× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 4.33× its world share, 14 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.18× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 0.53× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.45× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.10× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Medicine, 4.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 13 fields, with their numbers
  1. Medicine4.33×14 works
  2. Neuroscience1.46×0 works
  3. Psychology1.10×0 works
  4. Chemical Engineering0.83×0 works
  5. Decision Sciences0.53×0 works
  6. Immunology and Microbiology0.51×0 works
  7. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.45×0 works
  8. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.42×0 works
  9. Environmental Science0.41×0 works
  10. Health Professions0.37×0 works
  11. Arts and Humanities0.18×0 works
  12. Engineering0.15×0 works
  13. Social Sciences0.07×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Kliniek ViaSana?

Ranked on the quality score, Ronald van Heerwaarden, Justus‐Martijn Brinkman and Yvette Pronk lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Kliniek ViaSana.

  1. 1 Ronald van Heerwaarden Netherlands · #812,092 worldwide 907 citations · 36 works
  2. 2 Justus‐Martijn Brinkman Netherlands · #984,130 worldwide 1.4k citations · 33 works
  3. 3 Yvette Pronk Netherlands · #1,284,102 worldwide 534 citations · 30 works
  4. 4 C Grohé Netherlands · #4,952,411 worldwide 0 citations · 16 works
  5. 5 Servan Rooker Netherlands · #5,128,523 worldwide 331 citations · 38 works
All ranked researchers at Kliniek ViaSana

What are the most cited papers from Kliniek ViaSana?

The most cited paper from Kliniek ViaSana is "Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus" (Nicky van Melick, Robert E. H. van Cingel, Frans A.M. Brooijmans et al., 2016), with 916 citations. Next come "Calcium hydroxylapatite: A review on safety and complications" (146) and "Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Sapheno-Femoral Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein with Endovenous Laser Ablation (980 nm) Using Local Tumescent Anaesthesia: One Year Results" (140).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus Nicky van Melick, Robert E. H. van Cingel, Frans A.M. Brooijmans et al. · British Journal of Sports Medicine Review 18 Aug 2016 916
2 Calcium hydroxylapatite: A review on safety and complications Jonathan A. Kadouch · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Mar 2017 146
3 Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Sapheno-Femoral Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein with Endovenous Laser Ablation (980 nm) Using Local Tumescent Anaesthesia: One Year Results Pascal Pronk, Stefanie A. Gauw, Michael C. Mooij et al. · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Open access 4 Oct 2010 140
4 Biomaterials in search of a meniscus substitute Jan J. Rongen, Tony G. van Tienen, Bas van Bochove et al. · Biomaterials 26 Jan 2014 128
5 Synthetic meniscus replacement: a review A.C.T. Vrancken, Pieter Buma, Tony G. van Tienen · International Orthopaedics Open access 25 Oct 2012 115
All 63 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Kliniek ViaSana?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Complications, Revision Surgery, Total Hip Replacement, Epidemiology, Patient Satisfaction, Arthroplasty, Outcomes and Total Knee Replacement.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology12▲ 4.9×24 topics
  2. Complications10▲ 33×7 topics
  3. Revision Surgery10▲ 143×2 topics
  4. Total Hip Replacement10▲ 143×2 topics
  5. Patient Satisfaction8▲ 55×4 topics
  6. Arthroplasty7▲ 143×2 topics
  7. Outcomes7▲ 159×1 topic
  8. Total Knee Replacement7▲ 207×1 topic
  9. Inflammation4▲ 2.6×10 topics
  10. Osteoarthritis3▲ 45×2 topics
  11. Hip Arthroplasty3▲ 86×1 topic
  12. Wear Particles3▲ 86×1 topic
  13. Anterior Cruciate Ligament3▲ 146×1 topic
  14. Injury Risk3▲ 146×1 topic
  15. Quality of Life3▲ 3.9×13 topics
  16. Regeneration3▲ 25×4 topics
  17. Clinical Trials2▲ 6.7×6 topics
  18. Degenerative Disc Disease2▲ 43×2 topics
  19. Cartilage2▲ 84×1 topic
  20. Chemotherapy2▲ 5.3×11 topics
  21. Chondrocyte2▲ 84×1 topic
  22. Low Back Pain2▲ 19×2 topics
  23. Clinical Practice Guidelines2▲ 5.2×8 topics
  24. Rehabilitation2▲ 8.2×5 topics
  25. Clinical Outcomes2▲ 13×3 topics
  26. Biomechanics2▲ 8.0×5 topics
  27. Spinal Fusion2▲ 29×2 topics
  28. Cosmetic Surgery2▲ 73×2 topics
  29. Targeted Therapy2▲ 11×3 topics
  30. Surgical Management1▲ 4.9×5 topics
  31. Surgical Treatment1▲ 11×2 topics
  32. Survival Analysis1▲ 8.4×5 topics
  33. Treatment Guidelines1▲ 11×3 topics
  34. Anatomy1▲ 26×2 topics
  35. Intervertebral Disc1▲ 33×1 topic
  36. Lumbar Disc Degeneration1▲ 33×1 topic
  37. Chronic Pain1▲ 8.4×3 topics
  38. Periprosthetic Joint Infection1▲ 48×1 topic
  39. Prosthetic Joint Infections1▲ 48×1 topic
  40. Growth Factors1▲ 18×3 topics

Which research topics does Kliniek ViaSana publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes, Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques.

  1. 1 Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Surgery 2 works
  2. 2 Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty Surgery 1 works
  3. 3 Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works
  4. 4 Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques Surgery 0 works
  5. 5 Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  6. 6 Hip and Femur Fractures Surgery 0 works
  7. 7 Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy Surgery 0 works
  8. 8 Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 0 works
  9. 9 Physical Activity and Health Physiology 0 works
  10. 10 Sinusitis and nasal conditions Otorhinolaryngology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available52.8%not open47.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors33.5%domestic only66.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Kliniek ViaSana's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 15% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Kliniek ViaSana as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000065% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Kliniek ViaSana0.000056% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Kliniek ViaSana over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Kliniek ViaSana. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.