Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Rheumatology

Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms is a research topic within Rheumatology. Science Explorer counts 50k research works in it since 1950. 23.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis, with an emphasis on cartilage degradation, inflammation, joint mechanics, and potential therapeutic approaches such as cartilage regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells. It also covers the role of chondrocytes, matrix metalloproteinases, and synovitis in the development and progression of osteoarthritis.

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Cartilage
  • Chondrocyte
  • Inflammation
  • Joint
  • Regeneration
  • Matrix Metalloproteinases
  • Synovitis
  • Hypertrophy
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Research works
50k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
12k
per year above
Top-10% rate
23.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+20%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (2.6k and 1.7k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 2.6k works
  2. 2 United States 1.7k works
  3. 3 Japan 458 works
  4. 4 United Kingdom 451 works
  5. 5 India 442 works
  6. 6 Germany 331 works
  7. 7 Australia 294 works
  8. 8 South Korea 288 works
  9. 9 Canada 252 works
  10. 10 Italy 243 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 36.3%United States: 24.6%Japan: 6.5%United Kingdom: 6.4%6 others listed: 26.2%36%largest
China2,565 · 36.3%United States1,739 · 24.6%Japan458 · 6.5%United Kingdom451 · 6.4%6 others listed1,851 · 26.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill publishes the most Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms research, followed by Sichuan University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 57 works
  2. 2 Sichuan UniversityChina 49 works
  3. 3 Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChina 44 works
  4. 4 Lund UniversitySweden 37 works
  5. 5 Peking UniversityChina 36 works
  6. 6 Rush University Medical CenterUnited States 36 works
  7. 7 Boston UniversityUnited States 35 works
  8. 8 Hospital for Special SurgeryUnited States 33 works
  9. 9 Erasmus MCNetherlands 33 works
  10. 10 Sun Yat-sen UniversityChina 29 works

Who are the leading researchers in Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms include Cyrus Cooper.

  1. 1 Cyrus Cooper United Kingdom 7.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms research done?

The largest centres of Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Guangzhou (China) and Seoul (South Korea).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 256 works
  2. 2 Shanghai China 239 works
  3. 3 Guangzhou China 203 works
  4. 4 Seoul South Korea 134 works
  5. 5 Tokyo Japan 113 works
  6. 6 Chengdu China 111 works
  7. 7 Boston United States 110 works
  8. 8 New York United States 110 works
  9. 9 Xi'an China 105 works
  10. 10 Melbourne Australia 104 works
See Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms on the map

Where is the best place to study Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms?

Among universities, judged by research, La Trobe University, Anhui Medical University and Zhejiang Chinese Medical University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 32.95%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →La Trobe University: 24, 22.7%Anhui Medical University: 22, 33.6%Zhejiang Chinese Medical University: 24, 42.5%Beijing University of Chinese Medicine: 14, 29.6%Southern Medical University: 25, 43.9%University of Oulu: 15, 28.7%Wenzhou Medical University: 21, 42.7%Keele University: 16, 23.6%Shanxi Medical University: 21, 24.5%Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine: 19, 37.7%Zhejiang Chinese Med…Anhui Medical Univer…Beijing University o…La Trobe University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 La Trobe UniversityAustralia 62.522.7%8.3×24 +215.4%
2 Anhui Medical UniversityChina 58.933.6%7.6×22 +158.4%
3 Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityChina 58.342.5%9.7×24 -25.9%
4 Beijing University of Chinese MedicineChina 56.329.6%8.2×14 +372.7%
5 Southern Medical UniversityChina 56.143.9%7.1×25 +15.5%
6 University of OuluFinland 55.828.7%6.2×15 +182.8%
7 Wenzhou Medical UniversityChina 55.542.7%6.4×21 +79.8%
8 Keele UniversityUnited Kingdom 54.323.6%16.7×16 +44.0%
9 Shanxi Medical UniversityChina 54.224.5%10.0×21 +56.4%
10 Guangzhou University of Chinese MedicineChina 54.237.7%10.8×19 -41.6%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 20% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.