Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Rheumatology

Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes

Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes is a research topic within Rheumatology. Science Explorer counts 30k research works in it since 1950. 12.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the hypereosinophilic syndrome and related disorders, including the molecular pathogenesis, classification, and therapeutic management. It covers topics such as fusion genes (e.g., FIP1L1-PDGFRA), imatinib mesylate treatment, cardiac manifestations, and the classification of eosinophilic disorders.

  • Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
  • Fusion Genes
  • Imatinib Mesylate
  • Eosinophilia
  • PDGFRA
  • Classification
  • Molecular Pathogenesis
  • Cardiac Manifestations
  • Therapeutic Management
  • Eosinophilic Disorders
Research works
30k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
3.8k
per year above
Top-10% rate
12.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+19%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes research?

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (1.4k and 480 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.4k works
  2. 2 China 480 works
  3. 3 Japan 357 works
  4. 4 India 265 works
  5. 5 Italy 264 works
  6. 6 Spain 181 works
  7. 7 Germany 180 works
  8. 8 France 170 works
  9. 9 United Kingdom 164 works
  10. 10 Brazil 121 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 38.4%China: 13.5%Japan: 10.1%India: 7.5%6 others listed: 30.5%38%largest
United States1,360 · 38.4%China480 · 13.5%Japan357 · 10.1%India265 · 7.5%6 others listed1,080 · 30.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes research?

By volume in 2022–2025, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center publishes the most Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes research, followed by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and Mayo Clinic in Arizona.

Who are the leading researchers in Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes include Hagop M. Kantarjian.

  1. 1 Hagop M. Kantarjian United States 4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes research done?

The largest centres of Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan), New York (United States) and London (United Kingdom). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Cincinnati.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 86 works
  2. 2 Tokyo Japan 83 works
  3. 3 New York United States 71 works
  4. 4 London United Kingdom 67 works
  5. 5 Paris France 66 works
  6. 6 Philadelphia United States 54 works
  7. 7 Boston United States 48 works
  8. 8 Houston United States 44 works
  9. 9 Rome Italy 43 works
  10. 10 Madrid Spain 40 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. CincinnatiUS · 24.9 works6.8×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes than the world average.

See Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes on the map

Where is the best place to study Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes?

Among universities, judged by research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, University of Padua and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 21.64%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: 15, 27.5%University of Padua: 17, 24.9%University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: 18, 37.0%Harvard University: 13, 29.8%Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College: 21, 12.6%University of Colorado Denver: 10, 23.6%University of Pennsylvania: 14, 19.9%Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research: 13, 3.1%Northwestern University: 10, 27.2%University of Virginia: 10, 10.8%University of North …Harvard UniversityIcahn School of Medi…University of Padua
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUnited States 57.327.5%6.6×15 +29.1%
2 University of PaduaItaly 55.024.9%4.5×17 +49.5%
3 University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUnited States 53.937.0%2.3×18 +42.3%
4 Harvard UniversityUnited States 48.429.8%2.3×13 +19.1%
5 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 47.712.6%4.8×21 +65.1%
6 University of Colorado DenverUnited States 45.923.6%6.9×10 +18.1%
7 University of PennsylvaniaUnited States 42.219.9%3.4×14 +47.4%
8 Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchIndia 40.23.1%8.6×13 +74.6%
9 Northwestern UniversityUnited States 39.427.2%3.2×10 +14.3%
10 University of VirginiaUnited States 38.710.8%4.0×10 +206.9%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 19% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2023. The fastest-growing topics are Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.