Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Trier · Germany

Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen

In research, Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen stands highest in Health Sciences (#7,902 of 16,688 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#25,140
of 34,923
Rank in Germany
#1,214
of 1,603
Research works
190
▼ 11% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.7k
9.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
4.8%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.99×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
13%
world 18%

What is Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Health SciencesDomain #7,902 of 16,688 4.4%129

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen work in?

In 2022-now, 65% of research at Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen is in Health Sciences, 24% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (62%), Arts and Humanities (16%), Social Sciences (4%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 23 fractional works · 65.3% of its workMedicine: 22 fractional works · 62.2% of its workSurgery: 3 fractional works · 7.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 3 fractional works · 7.1% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 2 fractional works · 5.1% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workEmergency Medicine: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workOncology: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInternal Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 9 fractional works · 24.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 6 fractional works · 15.9% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 2 fractional works · 4.2% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 3.8% of its workClassics: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workReligious studies: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.2% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.7% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workParasitology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workALL ITS WORKKlinikumMutterhaus der…35fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences4%Health Sciences65%Social Sciences24%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine2262.2%
    2. Health Professions12.8%
    3. Nursing00.3%
    1. Arts and Humanities615.9%
    2. Social Sciences24.2%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting12.5%
    4. Psychology11.6%
    1. Immunology and Microbiology13.1%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology12.2%
    3. Neuroscience01.0%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.2%
    5. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.2%
    1. Engineering13.2%
    2. Environmental Science00.3%
    3. Computer Science00.2%
    4. Physics and Astronomy00.2%
    5. Chemistry00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.42× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 3.04× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.60× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.67× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Chemistry: 0.02× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.21× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.06× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.05× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 3.24× its world share, 22 worksMedicineNursing: 0.69× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 5.50× its world share, 6 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.76× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 0.51× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.33× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 5.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 17 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities5.50×6 works
  2. Medicine3.24×22 works
  3. Immunology and Microbiology3.04×1 works
  4. Health Professions1.05×1 works
  5. Business, Management and Accounting0.76×1 works
  6. Nursing0.69×0 works
  7. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.67×0 works
  8. Neuroscience0.60×0 works
  9. Psychology0.51×1 works
  10. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.42×1 works
  11. Social Sciences0.33×2 works
  12. Engineering0.21×1 works
  13. Physics and Astronomy0.07×0 works
  14. Environmental Science0.06×0 works
  15. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.03×0 works
  16. Computer Science0.03×0 works
  17. Chemistry0.02×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen?

Ranked on the quality score, Rolf Mahlberg, Michael Clemens and W. Dornoff lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen.

  1. 1 Rolf Mahlberg Germany · #200,691 worldwide 6.6k citations · 116 works
  2. 2 Michael Clemens Germany · #282,410 worldwide 12k citations · 188 works
  3. 3 W. Dornoff Germany · #1,723,050 worldwide 1.2k citations · 28 works
  4. 4 Manfred Jakubowski-Tiessen Germany · #2,664,380 worldwide 104 citations · 30 works
  5. 5 Oliver Kunitz Germany · #2,682,386 worldwide 742 citations · 68 works
  6. 6 Arnold Orgler Germany · #3,101,484 worldwide 105 citations · 20 works
  7. 7 Kurt Hofmeier Germany · #3,419,307 worldwide 19 citations · 20 works
  8. 8 Karl‐Heinz Ludwig Germany · #3,444,158 worldwide 199 citations · 51 works
  9. 9 F. P. Schwerdtfeger Germany · #5,460,031 worldwide 533 citations · 87 works
  10. 10 Peter Kress Germany · #5,659,446 worldwide 209 citations · 49 works
All ranked researchers at Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen

What are the most cited papers from Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen?

The most cited paper from Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen is "Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial" (Salah‐Eddin Al‐Batran et al., 2019), with 2,700 citations. Next come "Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60)" (1,139) and "Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial" (751).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial Salah‐Eddin Al‐Batran et al. · The Lancet 11 Apr 2019 2,700
2 Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60) Michael G. Pfreundschuh et al. · The Lancet Oncology 17 Jan 2008 1,139
3 Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial Salah‐Eddin Al‐Batran et al. · The Lancet Oncology 22 Oct 2016 751
4 Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: A combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials Allan Lipton, Karim S. Fizazi, Alison Stopeck et al. · European Journal of Cancer 10 Sep 2012 592
5 A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study offixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy M. D. Green, Heinz Koelbl, José Baselga et al. · Annals of Oncology Open access 17 Dec 2002 588
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Medical Ethics, Meta-Analysis, Mechanical Ventilation, Complications, Diagnosis, Genetic Testing and Genetics.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 34 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 34 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology5▲ 3.6×27 topics
  2. Medical Ethics3▲ 69×3 topics
  3. Inflammation2▲ 3.0×7 topics
  4. Diagnosis2▲ 6.0×12 topics
  5. Meta-Analysis2▲ 9.3×4 topics
  6. Complications2▲ 10×7 topics
  7. Mechanical Ventilation2▲ 45×2 topics
  8. Genetics2▲ 6.7×8 topics
  9. Genetic Testing2▲ 39×3 topics
  10. Clinical Practice Guidelines2▲ 7.5×7 topics
  11. Patient Rights2▲ 62×1 topic
  12. Reproductive Medicine2▲ 322×1 topic
  13. Treatment2▲ 3.5×10 topics
  14. Diagnostic Algorithm1▲ 92×2 topics
  15. Public Health1▲ 2.8×6 topics
  16. Bone Marrow Biopsy1▲ 209×1 topic
  17. FDG PET/CT1▲ 155×1 topic
  18. Airway Stenosis1▲ 62×1 topic
  19. Cardiovascular Disease1▲ 2.9×5 topics
  20. Eugenics1▲ 127×1 topic
  21. Identity1▲ 4.5×3 topics
  22. Literature1▲ 6.0×4 topics
  23. Nazi Era1▲ 549×1 topic
  24. Quality of Life1▲ 2.3×6 topics
  25. Risk Factors1▲ 3.0×11 topics
  26. Surgical Management1▲ 8.2×4 topics
  27. Tracheostomy1▲ 62×1 topic
  28. Cultural History1▲ 25×1 topic
  29. Difficult Airway Society1▲ 99×1 topic
  30. Management1▲ 4.0×7 topics
  31. Medieval Literature1▲ 164×1 topic
  32. Tracheal Intubation1▲ 99×1 topic
  33. Interreligious Relations1▲ 325×1 topic
  34. Religious Education1▲ 17×1 topic

Which research topics does Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Medical and Health Sciences Research, Hematological disorders and diagnostics, Tracheal and airway disorders and Medical History and Research.

  1. 1 Medical and Health Sciences Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
  2. 2 Hematological disorders and diagnostics Emergency Medicine 1 works
  3. 3 Tracheal and airway disorders Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1 works
  4. 4 Medical History and Research History 1 works
  5. 5 Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies Classics 1 works
  6. 6 Airway Management and Intubation Techniques Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1 works
  7. 7 Religion, Theology, and Education Religious studies 1 works
  8. 8 Literature and Cultural Memory Literature and Literary Theory 1 works
  9. 9 Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications Neurology 1 works
  10. 10 Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research Physiology 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available23.8%not open76.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors13.4%domestic only86.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 11% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00019% in 2024.

still counting0.00025%0.00050%0.00075%Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen0.000050% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Trier

All research institutions in Trier

Share Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen's ranking

Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen on Science Explorer

A card with Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Klinikum Mutterhaus der Borromäerinnen. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.