Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Seoul · South Korea

Korean Constitutional Law Association

In research, Korean Constitutional Law Association stands highest in Social Sciences (#1,712 of 14,833 worldwide), Social Sciences (#1,382 of 9,330 worldwide) and Law (#171 of 917 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Social Sciences and Social Sciences (Social Sciences is 5.8× its share of world research).

k-cla.or.krROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#5,896
of 34,923
Rank in South Korea
#96
of 512
Research works
3.8k
▼ 89% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.6k
0.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.5%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.68×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
13%
world 40%
International
2%
world 18%
Korean Constitutional Law Association

What is Korean Constitutional Law Association known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #1,712 of 14,833 2.3%3,485
Social SciencesField #1,382 of 9,330 2.5%2,690
LawSubfield #171 of 917 1.9%1,093
EducationSubfield #598 of 3,033 2.5%842
Political Science and International RelationsSubfield #629 of 2,238 3.9%513
Health SciencesDomain #9,223 of 16,688 3.2%199
AccountingSubfield #556 of 966 0.3%227
Business, Management and AccountingField #2,287 of 3,886 0.7%444
Strategy and ManagementSubfield #880 of 1,410 0.7%199
Economics, Econometrics and FinanceField #1,976 of 3,142 1.8%246

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Korean Constitutional Law Association sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Korean Constitutional Law Association work in?

In 2022-now, 91% of research at Korean Constitutional Law Association is in Social Sciences, 6% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (74%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (7%), Business, Management and Accounting (5%). It does 3.2× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 45 fractional works · 91.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 36 fractional works · 73.7% of its workLaw: 13 fractional works · 26.8% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 10 fractional works · 20.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 6 fractional works · 11.9% of its workEducation: 3 fractional works · 5.3% of its workTransportation: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDevelopment: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3 fractional works · 6.9% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 5.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3 fractional works · 5.4% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workAccounting: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 6.0% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workStatistics and Probability: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKKoreanConstitutional…49fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences2%Social Sciences91%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences3673.7%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance36.9%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting35.4%
    4. Arts and Humanities12.0%
    5. Psychology11.7%
    6. Decision Sciences11.4%
    1. Environmental Science12.0%
    2. Mathematics12.0%
    3. Computer Science11.5%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.3%
    5. Engineering00.1%
    1. Medicine11.8%
    2. Health Professions00.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.9%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What does Korean Constitutional Law Association specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Social Sciences takes 5.8× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Social SciencesField · 36.4 works5.8×
  2. Social SciencesDomain · 45.0 works3.6×
← less than its size predicts1×more →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.19× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 0.20× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.41× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 1.72× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsHealth Professions: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.09× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.70× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.67× its world share, 3 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.40× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3.23× its world share, 3 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.55× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 5.82× its world share, 36 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 5.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 14 fields, with their numbers
  1. Social Sciences5.82×36 works
  2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance3.23×3 works
  3. Mathematics1.72×1 works
  4. Business, Management and Accounting1.67×3 works
  5. Decision Sciences1.40×1 works
  6. Arts and Humanities0.70×1 works
  7. Psychology0.55×1 works
  8. Environmental Science0.41×1 works
  9. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.22×0 works
  10. Computer Science0.20×1 works
  11. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.19×0 works
  12. Health Professions0.09×0 works
  13. Medicine0.09×1 works
  14. Engineering0.01×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Korean Constitutional Law Association?

Ranked on the quality score, Maybritt Jill Alpes, Lisanne Groen and Henk E. S. Woldring lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Korean Constitutional Law Association.

  1. 1 Maybritt Jill Alpes South Korea · #436,175 worldwide 705 citations · 58 works
  2. 2 Lisanne Groen South Korea · #784,217 worldwide 533 citations · 78 works
  3. 3 Henk E. S. Woldring South Korea · #1,713,354 worldwide 1.6k citations · 125 works
  4. 4 T.P. Spijkerboer South Korea · #1,848,851 worldwide 1.4k citations · 280 works
  5. 5 J.G. Vrielink South Korea · #1,993,213 worldwide 50 citations · 26 works
  6. 6 K.M. de Vries South Korea · #2,318,259 worldwide 253 citations · 102 works
  7. 7 Jan Willem Sap South Korea · #2,391,136 worldwide 599 citations · 23 works
  8. 8 Paulien de Morree South Korea · #2,849,859 worldwide 30 citations · 22 works
  9. 9 K.E. Geertsema South Korea · #3,064,239 worldwide 73 citations · 54 works
  10. 10 Pieter N. Holtrop South Korea · #3,200,537 worldwide 12 citations · 29 works
All ranked researchers at Korean Constitutional Law Association

What are the most cited papers from Korean Constitutional Law Association?

The most cited paper from Korean Constitutional Law Association is "The Human Costs of Border Control" (T.P. Spijkerboer, 2007), with 140 citations. Next come "De betekenis van de AVG voor geautomatiseerde besluitvorming door de overheid. Een black box voor een black box" (45) and "The protection of vulnerable groups and individuals by the European Court of Human Rights" (39).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The Human Costs of Border Control T.P. Spijkerboer · European Journal of Migration and Law 2007 140
2 De betekenis van de AVG voor geautomatiseerde besluitvorming door de overheid. Een black box voor een black box N. Jak, Steven Bastiaans · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) Open access 23 Nov 2018 45
3 The protection of vulnerable groups and individuals by the European Court of Human Rights Yussef Al Tamimi · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) 2016 39
4 Pathways of Western liberal constitutional development in Asia: A comparative study of five major nations Albert Chen · International Journal of Constitutional Law Oct 2010 36
5 The Coming of a 'Blank Cheque' -- Europe, the 1951 Convention, and the 1967 Protocol Kazimierz Bem · International Journal of Refugee Law 9 Nov 2004 36
All 59 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Korean Constitutional Law Association?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Artificial Intelligence, Human Rights, Legal Regulation, Blockchain Technology, Constitutional Reform, Digital Technologies, Public Policy and Cybersecurity.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Artificial Intelligence13▲ 19×8 topics
  2. Human Rights12▲ 23×29 topics
  3. Legal Regulation8▲ 69×6 topics
  4. Blockchain Technology7▲ 256×2 topics
  5. Constitutional Reform6▲ 374×3 topics
  6. Digital Technologies5▲ 81×2 topics
  7. Public Policy5▲ 23×2 topics
  8. Cybersecurity5▲ 42×1 topic
  9. Globalization5▲ 5.3×14 topics
  10. Legal Modernization5▲ 354×1 topic
  11. European Union5▲ 45×9 topics
  12. Taxation4▲ 98×3 topics
  13. International Law4▲ 23×12 topics
  14. Criminal Proceedings3▲ 513×1 topic
  15. Digital Justice3▲ 513×1 topic
  16. Digital Economy3▲ 32×6 topics
  17. Intersectionality3▲ 30×3 topics
  18. Sustainable Development3▲ 3.6×10 topics
  19. Comparative Law3▲ 493×2 topics
  20. Democracy2▲ 14×5 topics
  21. Global Governance2▲ 20×9 topics
  22. Judicial Review2▲ 56×3 topics
  23. Information Security2▲ 47×2 topics
  24. Fundamental Rights2▲ 241×2 topics
  25. Constitutionalism2▲ 44×2 topics
  26. Economic Security2▲ 18×4 topics
  27. Genetic Information2▲ 102×1 topic
  28. Inclusion2▲ 27×2 topics
  29. International Trade2▲ 26×2 topics
  30. Migration2▲ 11×4 topics
  31. Labor Law2▲ 144×3 topics
  32. ECHR2▲ 92×1 topic
  33. Empowerment2▲ 34×2 topics
  34. Environmental Protection2▲ 65×5 topics
  35. European Legal Systems2▲ 92×1 topic
  36. Financialization2▲ 34×1 topic
  37. Legal Methodology2▲ 183×1 topic
  38. Research Methods2▲ 21×1 topic
  39. Social Work2▲ 49×1 topic
  40. Schengen Area2▲ 117×2 topics

Which research topics does Korean Constitutional Law Association publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Legal and Policy Issues, Education, Law, and Society, Digital Transformation in Law and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies.

Legal and Policy Issues5Legal and Policy Issues: 5 fractional worksEducation, Law, and Soci…3Education, Law, and Society: 3 fractional worksDigital Transformation i…2Digital Transformation in Law: 2 fractional worksDutch Social and Cultural Studies: 2 fractional worksComparative and International Law Studies: 2 fractional worksEuropean and International Law Studies: 2 fractional worksLegal and Regulatory Analysis: 2 fractional worksEuropean Law and Migration: 1 fractional worksEuropean Criminal Justice and Data Protection: 1 fractional worksLegal Language and Interpretation: 1 fractional works
LawPolitical Science and International RelationsGeneral Economics, Econometrics and FinanceEducation1 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Legal and Policy Issues Law 5 works
  2. 2 Education, Law, and Society Political Science and International Relations 3 works
  3. 3 Digital Transformation in Law General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 works
  4. 4 Dutch Social and Cultural Studies Education 2 works
  5. 5 Comparative and International Law Studies Law 2 works
  6. 6 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 2 works
  7. 7 Legal and Regulatory Analysis Transportation 2 works
  8. 8 European Law and Migration Law 1 works
  9. 9 European Criminal Justice and Data Protection Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  10. 10 Legal Language and Interpretation Law 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available12.7%not open87.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors2.0%domestic only98.0%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Korean Constitutional Law Association's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 89% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Korean Constitutional Law Association as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000087% in 2024.

still counting0.010%0.020%Korean Constitutional Law Association0.00030% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Korean Constitutional Law Association over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

5%10%15%all institutions10.0% in 2021Korean Constitutional Law Association1.0% in 2021200020102020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 6.1% in 2020.

Other research institutions in Seoul

All research institutions in Seoul

Share Korean Constitutional Law Association's ranking

Korean Constitutional Law Association on Science Explorer

A card with Korean Constitutional Law Association's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Korean Constitutional Law Association. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.