Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Austin · United States

Migrant Clinicians Network

World rank, all time
#31,324
of 34,923
Rank in United States
#6,624
of 7,310
Research works
158
▼ 32% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.5k
9.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
6.6%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.97×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
49%
world 40%
International
25%
world 18%

Which fields of science does Migrant Clinicians Network work in?

In 2022-now, 66% of research at Migrant Clinicians Network is in Social Sciences, 19% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (47%), Psychology (13%), Health Professions (10%). It does 2.2× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 22 fractional works · 66.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 16 fractional works · 47.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 8 fractional works · 25.4% of its workHealth: 3 fractional works · 8.2% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 4 fractional works · 12.9% of its workClinical Psychology: 3 fractional works · 8.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workManagement Information Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Sciences: 6 fractional works · 19.4% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 10.0% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 2 fractional works · 7.2% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComplementary and Manual Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMedicine: 3 fractional works · 7.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOrthodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 3 fractional works · 8.8% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKMigrantClinicians…33fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences9%Physical Sciences6%Health Sciences19%Social Sciences66%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1647.4%
    2. Psychology412.9%
    3. Arts and Humanities13.1%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting01.3%
    5. Decision Sciences01.0%
    6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.5%
    1. Health Professions310.0%
    2. Medicine37.9%
    3. Dentistry01.2%
    4. Veterinary00.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences13.2%
    2. Neuroscience12.7%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology11.7%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology01.2%
    1. Environmental Science12.2%
    2. Computer Science11.8%
    3. Engineering01.5%
    4. Chemistry00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.68× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.32× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.21× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 1.64× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 0.08× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.23× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.10× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.44× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceDentistry: 2.45× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 3.81× its world share, 3 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.41× its world share, 3 worksMedicineVeterinary: 1.87× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 1.06× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.39× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 1.03× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 4.23× its world share, 4 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.75× its world share, 16 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 18 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology4.23×4 works
  2. Health Professions3.81×3 works
  3. Social Sciences3.75×16 works
  4. Dentistry2.45×0 works
  5. Veterinary1.87×0 works
  6. Neuroscience1.64×1 works
  7. Immunology and Microbiology1.21×0 works
  8. Arts and Humanities1.06×1 works
  9. Decision Sciences1.03×0 works
  10. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.68×1 works
  11. Environmental Science0.44×1 works
  12. Medicine0.41×3 works
  13. Business, Management and Accounting0.39×0 works
  14. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.32×1 works
  15. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.24×0 works
  16. Computer Science0.23×1 works
  17. Engineering0.10×0 works
  18. Chemistry0.08×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Migrant Clinicians Network?

Ranked on the quality score, Amy King Liebman, Deliana García and Wahyu Susilo lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Migrant Clinicians Network.

  1. 1 Amy King Liebman United States · #3,004,619 worldwide 1.1k citations · 65 works
  2. 2 Deliana García United States · #3,117,016 worldwide 224 citations · 30 works
  3. 3 Wahyu Susilo United States · #3,909,660 worldwide 10 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Barbara E. Bishop United States · #4,951,220 worldwide 148 citations · 56 works
All ranked researchers at Migrant Clinicians Network

What are the most cited papers from Migrant Clinicians Network?

The most cited paper from Migrant Clinicians Network is "Promoting integrated approaches to reducing health inequities among low‐income workers: Applying a social ecological framework" (Sherry Baron, Sharon D. Beard, Letitia Davis et al., 2013), with 182 citations. Next come "Physical and Mental Health Status of Iraqi Refugees Resettled in the United States" (154) and "Patients' Attitudes and Preferences About Participation and Recruitment Strategies in Clinical Trials" (126).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Promoting integrated approaches to reducing health inequities among low‐income workers: Applying a social ecological framework Sherry Baron, Sharon D. Beard, Letitia Davis et al. · American Journal of Industrial Medicine Open access 26 Mar 2013 182
2 Physical and Mental Health Status of Iraqi Refugees Resettled in the United States Eboni M. Taylor, Emad A. Yanni, Clelia Pezzi et al. · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Open access 19 Aug 2013 154
3 Patients' Attitudes and Preferences About Participation and Recruitment Strategies in Clinical Trials Amit Sood, Kavita Prasad, Laveena Chhatwani et al. · Mayo Clinic Proceedings Open access 27 Feb 2009 126
4 Pesticides and environmental injustice in the USA: root causes, current regulatory reinforcement and a path forward Nathan Donley, Robert Doyle Bullard, Jeannie Economos et al. · BMC Public Health Open access 18 Apr 2022 94
5 Delivering Adolescent Vaccinations in the Medical Home: A New Era? Peter G. Szilagyi, Cynthia M. Rand, Jennie A. McLaurin et al. · PEDIATRICS 2008 91
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Migrant Clinicians Network?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Globalization, Public Health, Health Disparities, Social Networks, Public Policy, Healthcare Access and Resettlement.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 36 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 36 words, with their numbers
  1. Mental Health6▲ 13×12 topics
  2. Globalization6▲ 9.2×9 topics
  3. Public Health4▲ 9.3×13 topics
  4. Health Disparities2▲ 29×4 topics
  5. Healthcare Access2▲ 24×3 topics
  6. Public Policy2▲ 14×4 topics
  7. Resettlement2▲ 77×2 topics
  8. Social Networks2▲ 25×2 topics
  9. Immigration2▲ 58×2 topics
  10. Migration2▲ 18×6 topics
  11. Social Integration2▲ 155×2 topics
  12. Immigrant2▲ 88×2 topics
  13. Labor Market2▲ 22×2 topics
  14. Identity2▲ 7.7×6 topics
  15. International Migration2▲ 335×1 topic
  16. Network Effects2▲ 81×1 topic
  17. Refugee Law2▲ 335×1 topic
  18. Remittances2▲ 137×1 topic
  19. Vulnerability2▲ 24×4 topics
  20. Epidemiology2▲ 1.26×11 topics
  21. Mortality2▲ 8.4×3 topics
  22. Social Capital2▲ 9.6×2 topics
  23. Climate Change2▲ 1.70×3 topics
  24. Cultural Diversity2▲ 20×2 topics
  25. Refugee2▲ 82×1 topic
  26. Trauma2▲ 22×1 topic
  27. Ethnic Minority Business1▲ 163×1 topic
  28. Health1▲ 9.8×3 topics
  29. Immigrant Entrepreneurship1▲ 163×1 topic
  30. Citizenship1▲ 29×3 topics
  31. Depression1▲ 4.2×4 topics
  32. Social Justice1▲ 6.2×3 topics
  33. Gender1▲ 6.5×5 topics
  34. Ethnicity1▲ 8.2×3 topics
  35. Food Insecurity1▲ 53×2 topics
  36. Infectious Diseases1▲ 9.5×4 topics

Which research topics does Migrant Clinicians Network publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Migration and Labor Dynamics, Migration, Racism, and Human Rights, Migration, Health and Trauma and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy.

  1. 1 Migration and Labor Dynamics Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  2. 2 Migration, Racism, and Human Rights Health 2 works
  3. 3 Migration, Health and Trauma Clinical Psychology 2 works
  4. 4 Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  5. 5 Health and Conflict Studies General Health Professions 1 works
  6. 6 Agriculture and Farm Safety Plant Science 1 works
  7. 7 Autism Spectrum Disorder Research Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
  8. 8 Cultural Competency in Health Care Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  9. 9 Health disparities and outcomes Health 1 works
  10. 10 Climate Change and Health Impacts Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available49.0%not open51.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors24.8%domestic only75.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Migrant Clinicians Network's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 32% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Migrant Clinicians Network as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00013% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Migrant Clinicians Network0.000066% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Migrant Clinicians Network over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Austin

All research institutions in Austin

Share Migrant Clinicians Network's ranking

Migrant Clinicians Network on Science Explorer

A card with Migrant Clinicians Network's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Migrant Clinicians Network. Posts are plain text and can be reported.