Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Emeryville · United States

Nanōmix (United States)

nano.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
28
▲ 51% vs 2018-21
Citations
3.9k
139.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
16%
world 18%
Nanōmix (United States)

Not ranked overall: Nanōmix (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Nanōmix (United States) work in?

In all years, 87% of research at Nanōmix (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 7% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Materials Science (36%), Engineering (24%), Physics and Astronomy (15%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 24 fractional works · 87.4% of its workMaterials Science: 10 fractional works · 36.4% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 9 fractional works · 31.4% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 1 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPolymers and Plastics: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workEngineering: 7 fractional works · 23.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 3 fractional works · 11.9% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 2 fractional works · 8.7% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 4 fractional works · 14.9% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 4 fractional works · 13.5% of its workCondensed Matter Physics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workChemistry: 2 fractional works · 5.8% of its workElectrochemistry: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workInorganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSpectroscopy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workChemical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 5.2% of its workBioengineering: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workCatalysis: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workProcess Chemistry and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.5% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workMolecular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKNanōmix (UnitedStates)28fractional works, all years
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences87%Health Sciences4%Social Sciences1%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 13 fields, with their numbers
    1. Materials Science1036.4%
    2. Engineering723.6%
    3. Physics and Astronomy414.9%
    4. Chemistry25.8%
    5. Chemical Engineering15.2%
    6. Computer Science01.5%
    7. Environmental Science00.1%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology13.9%
    2. Neuroscience12.9%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.6%
    1. Medicine13.9%
    1. Social Sciences00.8%
    2. Arts and Humanities00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 5.33× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 2.88× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 3.57× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 2.01× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.42× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.60× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMedicine: 0.88× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.42× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesSocial Sciences: 1.11× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 5.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 10 fields, with their numbers
  1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology5.33×0 works
  2. Chemistry3.57×0 works
  3. Neuroscience2.88×0 works
  4. Arts and Humanities2.42×0 works
  5. Computer Science2.01×0 works
  6. Social Sciences1.11×0 works
  7. Medicine0.88×0 works
  8. Materials Science0.60×0 works
  9. Environmental Science0.42×0 works
  10. Engineering0.23×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Nanōmix (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Keith Bradley, Masato Mitsuhashi and W. A. J. Chapman lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Nanōmix (United States).

  1. 1 Keith Bradley United States · #267,818 worldwide 5.8k citations · 30 works
  2. 2 Masato Mitsuhashi United States · #2,106,764 worldwide 292 citations · 15 works
  3. 3 W. A. J. Chapman United States · #4,468,704 worldwide 11 citations · 17 works
All ranked researchers at Nanōmix (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Nanōmix (United States)?

The most cited paper from Nanōmix (United States) is "Electronic Detection of Specific Protein Binding Using Nanotube FET Devices" (Alexander Star, Jean‐Christophe P. Gabriel, Keith Bradley et al., 2003), with 770 citations. Next come "Label-free detection of DNA hybridization using carbon nanotube network field-effect transistors" (672) and "Gas Sensor Array Based on Metal-Decorated Carbon Nanotubes" (590).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Electronic Detection of Specific Protein Binding Using Nanotube FET Devices Alexander Star, Jean‐Christophe P. Gabriel, Keith Bradley et al. · Nano Letters 5 Mar 2003 770
2 Label-free detection of DNA hybridization using carbon nanotube network field-effect transistors Alexander Star, Eugene L. Tu, Joseph Niemann et al. · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Open access 17 Jan 2006 672
3 Gas Sensor Array Based on Metal-Decorated Carbon Nanotubes Alexander Star, Vikram Chandrashekhar Joshi, Sergei Skarupo et al. · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B Oct 2006 590
4 Flexible Nanotube Electronics Keith Bradley, Jean‐Christophe P. Gabriel, George Gruner · Nano Letters 9 Sep 2003 324
5 Nanoelectronic Carbon Dioxide Sensors Alexander Star, Tao Han, Vikram Chandrashekhar Joshi et al. · Advanced Materials 29 Oct 2004 319
All 45 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Nanōmix (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Electronics, Functionalization, Nanotubes, Carbon, Composites, Biosensors, Nanomaterials and Nanomechanical Systems.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 30 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 30 words, with their numbers
  1. Electronics6▲ 216×2 topics
  2. Functionalization6▲ 185×2 topics
  3. Nanotubes5▲ 167×2 topics
  4. Carbon5▲ 238×1 topic
  5. Composites5▲ 243×1 topic
  6. Biosensors5▲ 30×6 topics
  7. Nanomaterials3▲ 15×7 topics
  8. Nanomechanical Systems2▲ 186×1 topic
  9. Nanoparticles2▲ 6.8×7 topics
  10. Optomechanics2▲ 186×1 topic
  11. Carbon Nanotubes2▲ 23×5 topics
  12. Nanostructures2▲ 16×4 topics
  13. Hydrogen Storage2▲ 78×3 topics
  14. Catalysis1▲ 6.0×6 topics
  15. Field-Effect Transistors1▲ 27×2 topics
  16. Chemical Sensors1▲ 25×2 topics
  17. Nanocomposites1▲ 6.1×2 topics
  18. Nanofluidics1▲ 209×1 topic
  19. Nanopores1▲ 47×1 topic
  20. Two-Dimensional Materials1▲ 28×2 topics
  21. Materials1▲ 25×1 topic
  22. Metal Hydrides1▲ 173×1 topic
  23. Room Temperature1▲ 26×2 topics
  24. Biomedical Applications1▲ 3.6×5 topics
  25. Gas Sensors1▲ 51×1 topic
  26. Graphene1▲ 7.8×4 topics
  27. Metal Oxide1▲ 51×1 topic
  28. Organic Electronics1▲ 24×2 topics
  29. Molecular Communication1▲ 346×1 topic
  30. Nanonetworks1▲ 346×1 topic

Which research topics does Nanōmix (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Media, Gender, and Advertising, Text and Document Classification Technologies, Extracellular vesicles in disease and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances.

Media, Gender, and Advertising: 0 fractional worksText and Document Classification Technologies: 0 fractional worksExtracellular vesicles i…0Extracellular vesicles in disease: 0 fractional worksTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances: 0 fractional worksDigital Games and Media0Digital Games and Media: 0 fractional worksIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research: 0 fractional worksComics and Graphic Narratives: 0 fractional worksLipid Membrane Structure…0Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior: 0 fractional worksAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications: 0 fractional worksMachine Learning and Data Classification: 0 fractional works
Gender StudiesArtificial IntelligenceMolecular BiologyNeurology2 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Media, Gender, and Advertising Gender Studies 0 works
  2. 2 Text and Document Classification Technologies Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  3. 3 Extracellular vesicles in disease Molecular Biology 0 works
  4. 4 Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances Neurology 0 works
  5. 5 Digital Games and Media Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  6. 6 Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research Neurology 0 works
  7. 7 Comics and Graphic Narratives Visual Arts and Performing Arts 0 works
  8. 8 Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior Molecular Biology 0 works
  9. 9 Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications Molecular Biology 0 works
  10. 10 Machine Learning and Data Classification Artificial Intelligence 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available24.3%not open75.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors15.5%domestic only84.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Nanōmix (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 51% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting20052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Nanōmix (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000033% in 2021.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Nanōmix (United States)0.000016% in 202520102020

Fractional works of Nanōmix (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Emeryville

All research institutions in Emeryville

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Nanōmix (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.