Pro Persona
In research, Pro Persona stands highest in Social Sciences (#4,121 of 9,585 worldwide), Social Sciences (#3,921 of 5,988 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#6,862 of 9,902 worldwide), 2022-now. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Clinical Psychology (Clinical Psychology is 6.8× its share of world research).
- World rank, 2022-now
- #7,309 of 22,385 · #5,884 all time
- Rank in Netherlands
- #63 of 197
- Research works
- 1.1k ▼ 3% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 9.6k 8.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 8.9% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 0.97× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 72% world 40%
- International
- 51% world 18%
What is Pro Persona known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022-now, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #4,121 of 9,585 | 8.8% | 154 | #2970 | |
| Social SciencesField | #3,921 of 5,988 | 7.1% | 72 | #2617 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #6,862 of 9,902 | 9.5% | 63 | #4975 |
Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Pro Persona sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022-now. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#2,970 #4,121
- Social Sciences#2,617 #3,921
- Health Sciences#4,975 #6,862
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Which fields of science does Pro Persona work in?
In 2022-now, 58% of research at Pro Persona is in Social Sciences, 24% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (28%), Medicine (16%), Psychology (15%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 26 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences17857.7%
- Social Sciences8728.1%
- Psychology4615.0%
- Arts and Humanities247.7%
- Business, Management and Accounting103.4%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance72.4%
- Decision Sciences31.1%
- Health Sciences7524.2%
- Medicine5016.2%
- Health Professions227.2%
- Dentistry10.4%
- Nursing10.3%
- Veterinary00.0%
- Physical Sciences4113.3%
- Computer Science185.7%
- Engineering92.9%
- Environmental Science82.7%
- Physics and Astronomy20.5%
- Mathematics20.5%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences10.4%
- Energy10.3%
- Chemistry10.2%
- Materials Science00.1%
- Chemical Engineering00.0%
- Life Sciences154.8%
What does Pro Persona specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Clinical Psychology takes 6.8× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Clinical PsychologySubfield · 21.8 works6.8×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.9×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 26 fields, with their numbers
- Psychology4.93×46 works
- Health Professions2.74×22 works
- Arts and Humanities2.68×24 works
- Social Sciences2.22×87 works
- Neuroscience1.44×7 works
- Decision Sciences1.13×3 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.11×7 works
- Business, Management and Accounting1.05×10 works
- Dentistry0.92×1 works
- Medicine0.84×50 works
- Computer Science0.73×18 works
- Nursing0.57×1 works
- Environmental Science0.54×8 works
- Mathematics0.42×2 works
- Energy0.31×1 works
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.30×0 works
- Veterinary0.26×0 works
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.25×4 works
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.24×1 works
- Physics and Astronomy0.24×2 works
- Engineering0.19×9 works
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.18×3 works
- Immunology and Microbiology0.18×1 works
- Chemistry0.13×1 works
- Chemical Engineering0.10×0 works
- Materials Science0.02×0 works
- Psychology 4.9×
- Health Professions 2.7×
- Arts and Humanities 2.7×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Neuroscience 1.4×
- Decision Sciences 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.1×
- Dentistry 0.9×
- Medicine 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Nursing 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Energy 0.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.3×
- Veterinary 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Pro Persona?
Ranked on the quality score, Karina Janz Woitowicz, Michèle Schmitter and Bea G Tiemens lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Pro Persona.
- 1
Karina Janz Woitowicz
Netherlands · #3,194,312 worldwide 0 citations · 56 works
- 2
Michèle Schmitter
Netherlands · #3,295,036 worldwide 66 citations · 16 works
- 3
Bea G Tiemens
Netherlands · #3,356,909 worldwide 3.2k citations · 183 works
- 4
Theo Ingenhoven
Netherlands · #3,519,956 worldwide 700 citations · 64 works
- 5
Miriam Gallegos
Netherlands · #3,541,695 worldwide 16 citations · 15 works
- 6
Wies van den Bosch
Netherlands · #3,935,766 worldwide 95 citations · 19 works
- 7
Roberto Arlt
Netherlands · #4,692,267 worldwide 40 citations · 50 works
- 8
Ш.К. Карибаева
Netherlands · #4,984,732 worldwide 5 citations · 14 works
- 9
José Vega Blanco
Netherlands · #5,037,357 worldwide 3 citations · 22 works
- 10
Miguel Ángel Pinto Cebrián
Netherlands · #5,048,900 worldwide 22 citations · 22 works
Which keywords describe research at Pro Persona?
By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Education, Quality of Life, Depression, Identity, Globalization, Human Rights and Social Support.
- Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
- Personality Traits
- Health Status
- Memory
- Geriatric Assessment
- Mental Disorders
- Health Promotion
- Welfare State
- Aging Population
- Culture
- Social Justice
- Colonialism
- Literature
- Emotion Regulation
- Digital Transformation
- Social Support
- Identity
- Human Rights
- Globalization
- Education
- Mental Health
- Quality of Life
- Public Health
- Depression
- Sustainable Development
- History
- Psychopathology
- Gender
- Neurobiological Correlates
- Elderly Care
- Cultural Studies
- Social Integration
- Latin America
- Anxiety Disorders
- Family Functioning
- Communication
- Chronic Diseases
- Functional Dependence
- Innovation Ecosystems
- Psychological Interventions
Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Mental Health20▲ 4.5×32 topics
- Education17▲ 3.2×44 topics
- Quality of Life16▲ 3.6×34 topics
- Globalization16▲ 2.6×40 topics
- Public Health13▲ 2.9×31 topics
- Human Rights12▲ 4.0×32 topics
- Depression12▲ 4.5×17 topics
- Identity11▲ 5.1×26 topics
- Sustainable Development11▲ 2.2×24 topics
- Social Support10▲ 5.9×13 topics
- History10▲ 4.6×22 topics
- Digital Transformation9▲ 5.2×13 topics
- Psychopathology8▲ 16×4 topics
- Emotion Regulation8▲ 8.4×7 topics
- Gender8▲ 4.5×24 topics
- Literature8▲ 4.4×21 topics
- Neurobiological Correlates7▲ 23×3 topics
- Colonialism7▲ 4.9×16 topics
- Elderly Care7▲ 15×7 topics
- Social Justice7▲ 3.8×18 topics
- Cultural Studies7▲ 6.0×14 topics
- Culture6▲ 3.9×13 topics
- Social Integration6▲ 45×3 topics
- Aging Population6▲ 21×3 topics
- Latin America6▲ 9.4×13 topics
- Welfare State5▲ 22×3 topics
- Anxiety Disorders5▲ 15×2 topics
- Health Promotion5▲ 5.4×10 topics
- Family Functioning5▲ 53×2 topics
- Mental Disorders5▲ 14×3 topics
- Communication5▲ 5.1×10 topics
- Geriatric Assessment5▲ 23×2 topics
- Chronic Diseases5▲ 6.2×5 topics
- Memory5▲ 6.3×12 topics
- Functional Dependence5▲ 76×1 topic
- Health Status5▲ 76×1 topic
- Innovation Ecosystems4▲ 14×3 topics
- Personality Traits4▲ 10×5 topics
- Psychological Interventions4▲ 10×4 topics
- Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy4▲ 26×2 topics
Which research topics does Pro Persona publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: Aging, Health, and Disability, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Personality Disorders and Psychopathology and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Aging, Health, and Disability Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 5 works
- 2 Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4 works
- 3 Personality Disorders and Psychopathology Clinical Psychology 3 works
- 4 Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications Clinical Psychology 3 works
- 5 Social Sciences and Policies General Social Sciences 3 works
- 6 Mental Health Research Topics Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3 works
- 7 Business, Innovation, and Economy Economics and Econometrics 3 works
- 8 Treatment of Major Depression Pharmacology 3 works
- 9 Ethics and bioethics in healthcare Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 10 Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts Computer Networks and Communications 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has Pro Persona's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 3% lower than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Pro Persona as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0010% in 2024.
Fractional works of Pro Persona over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.
Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 12.3% in 2016.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Pro Persona. Posts are plain text and can be reported.
