Pro Persona
In research, Pro Persona stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,849 of 10,521 worldwide), Social Sciences (#5,679 of 6,365 worldwide) and Health Sciences (#11,334 of 11,982 worldwide), 2022–2025.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #16,492 of 28,054 · #18,145 all time
- Rank in Netherlands
- #153 of 237
- Research works
- 1.1k ▲ 51% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 9.6k 8.5 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 9.3% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 72% world 28%
What is Pro Persona known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #6,849 of 10,521 | 10.1% | 154 | #6192 | |
| Social SciencesField | #5,679 of 6,365 | 7.4% | 72 | #6923 | |
| Health SciencesDomain | #11,334 of 11,982 | 8.1% | 63 | #9433 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Pro Persona sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Social Sciences#6,192 #6,849
- Social Sciences#6,923 #5,679
- Health Sciences#9,433 #11,334
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 4.8×
- Arts and Humanities 3.0×
- Health Professions 2.6×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Neuroscience 1.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.2×
- Decision Sciences 1.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.1×
- Medicine 0.9×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Nursing 0.4×
- Dentistry 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.3×
- Energy 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.2×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.2×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.1×
- Chemical Engineering 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Pro Persona?
Ranked on the composite score, Demetrio Casado Pérez, Bauke Koekkoek and Theo Ingenhoven lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Pro Persona.
- 1 Demetrio Casado Pérez Netherlands · #369,844 worldwide 7 citations · 56 works
- 2 Bauke Koekkoek Netherlands · #1,556,744 worldwide 7 citations · 18 works
- 3 Theo Ingenhoven Netherlands · #1,587,575 worldwide 10 citations · 22 works
Which keywords describe research at Pro Persona?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Quality of Life, Identity, Human Rights, Depression, Social Support, Education and Emotion Regulation.
- Medical Ethics
- Ethical Challenges
- Memory
- Functional Dependence
- Healthcare Access
- Anxiety Disorders
- Gender Differences
- Latin America
- Culture
- Aging Population
- Neurobiological Correlates
- Digital Transformation
- Literature
- Gender
- Emotion Regulation
- Social Support
- Public Health
- Identity
- Globalization
- Quality of Life
- Mental Health
- Education
- Human Rights
- Depression
- Sustainable Development
- History
- Psychopathology
- Cultural Studies
- Colonialism
- Elderly Care
- Social Integration
- Social Justice
- Welfare State
- Family Functioning
- Geriatric Assessment
- Health Promotion
- Communication
- Health Status
- Mental Disorders
- Innovation Ecosystems
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Mental Health18▲ 4.7×29 topics
- Quality of Life15▲ 3.9×33 topics
- Education13▲ 2.9×39 topics
- Globalization13▲ 2.5×33 topics
- Human Rights12▲ 4.5×32 topics
- Identity11▲ 5.8×25 topics
- Depression11▲ 4.7×16 topics
- Public Health10▲ 2.6×27 topics
- Sustainable Development10▲ 2.4×21 topics
- Social Support9▲ 6.3×13 topics
- History9▲ 4.8×21 topics
- Emotion Regulation7▲ 8.9×7 topics
- Psychopathology7▲ 15×4 topics
- Gender7▲ 4.8×22 topics
- Cultural Studies7▲ 6.8×14 topics
- Literature7▲ 4.8×21 topics
- Colonialism7▲ 5.4×14 topics
- Digital Transformation6▲ 4.7×11 topics
- Elderly Care6▲ 15×7 topics
- Neurobiological Correlates6▲ 23×3 topics
- Social Integration6▲ 50×3 topics
- Aging Population6▲ 24×3 topics
- Social Justice6▲ 3.7×16 topics
- Culture5▲ 3.9×12 topics
- Welfare State5▲ 24×3 topics
- Latin America5▲ 10×12 topics
- Family Functioning5▲ 59×2 topics
- Gender Differences5▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Geriatric Assessment5▲ 27×2 topics
- Anxiety Disorders5▲ 16×2 topics
- Health Promotion5▲ 5.7×9 topics
- Healthcare Access5▲ 6.3×6 topics
- Communication5▲ 5.7×9 topics
- Functional Dependence5▲ 83×1 topic
- Health Status5▲ 83×1 topic
- Memory5▲ 7.2×12 topics
- Mental Disorders5▲ 15×3 topics
- Ethical Challenges4▲ 8.3×4 topics
- Innovation Ecosystems4▲ 16×3 topics
- Medical Ethics4▲ 11×4 topics
Which research topics does Pro Persona publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Aging, Health, and Disability, Social Sciences and Policies, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Aging, Health, and Disability Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 5 works
- 2 Social Sciences and Policies General Social Sciences 3 works
- 3 Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3 works
- 4 Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications Clinical Psychology 3 works
- 5 Business, Innovation, and Economy Economics and Econometrics 3 works
- 6 Mental Health Research Topics Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2 works
- 7 Personality Disorders and Psychopathology Clinical Psychology 2 works
- 8 Treatment of Major Depression Pharmacology 2 works
- 9 Ethics and bioethics in healthcare Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 10 Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts Computer Networks and Communications 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Pro Persona's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 51% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.