Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Enschede · Netherlands

Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie

roessingh.nlROR OpenAlex
Research works
17
▲ 39% vs 2018-21
Citations
132
7.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
28%
world 40%
International
11%
world 18%
Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie

Not ranked overall: Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie work in?

In all years, 83% of research at Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie is in Health Sciences, 12% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (59%), Health Professions (15%), Dentistry (9%). It does 2.5× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 14 fractional works · 82.9% of its workMedicine: 10 fractional works · 59.0% of its workSurgery: 3 fractional works · 14.9% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workInternal Medicine: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workAnatomy: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workOrthopedics and Sports Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 14.8% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workComplementary and Manual Therapy: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDentistry: 2 fractional works · 9.1% of its workOrthodontics: 1 fractional works · 5.8% of its workPeriodontics: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workGeneral Dentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOral Surgery: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 12.4% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 7.1% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workAccounting: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSensory Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKRoessingh,Centrum voor…17fractional works, all years
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences1%Health Sciences83%Social Sciences12%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 11 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1059.0%
    2. Health Professions314.8%
    3. Dentistry29.1%
    1. Psychology17.1%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting14.0%
    3. Arts and Humanities00.6%
    4. Social Sciences00.6%
    1. Neuroscience02.3%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology01.1%
    1. Engineering01.0%
    2. Computer Science00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 2.31× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceDentistry: 38.66× its world share, 1 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 8.07× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.27× its world share, 1 worksMedicineBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3.49× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksPsychology1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Dentistry, 38.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Dentistry38.66×1 works
  2. Health Professions8.07×1 works
  3. Business, Management and Accounting3.49×0 works
  4. Neuroscience2.31×0 works
  5. Medicine2.27×1 works
  6. Psychology0.23×0 works
  7. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.12×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie?

The most cited paper from Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie is "The effect of static versus dynamic depictions of actions in verb and sentence production in aphasia" (Joyce Blankestijn-Wilmsen, Ilona Damen, Vicky Voorbraak-Timmerman et al., 2016), with 17 citations. Next come "[Favourable results of a rehabilitation programme with cognitive behavioural therapy and graded physical activity in patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome]." (14) and "The co-development and evaluation of an e-learning course on spinal cord injury physical activity counselling: a randomized controlled trial" (12).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The effect of static versus dynamic depictions of actions in verb and sentence production in aphasia Joyce Blankestijn-Wilmsen, Ilona Damen, Vicky Voorbraak-Timmerman et al. · Aphasiology Open access Dec 2016 17
2 [Favourable results of a rehabilitation programme with cognitive behavioural therapy and graded physical activity in patients with the chronic-fatigue syndrome]. Mirjam Torenbeek, C.A.J. Mes, M J van Liere et al. · PubMed 23 Sep 2006 14
3 The co-development and evaluation of an e-learning course on spinal cord injury physical activity counselling: a randomized controlled trial Femke Hoekstra, Heather Louise Gainforth, Rogier Broeksteeg et al. · BMC Medical Education Open access 6 Mar 2024 12
4 Theory- and evidence-based best practices for physical activity counseling for adults with spinal cord injury Femke Hoekstra, Heather Louise Gainforth, Rogier Broeksteeg et al. · Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Open access 29 Mar 2023 9
5 Normering van de ASTA, Analyse voor Spontane Taal bij Afasie Fennetta van der Scheer, Mariëlle Zwaga, Roel Jonkers · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) Open access 2011 8
All 20 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Law, logistics, and international trade, Child and Adolescent Health, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders and Dental Education, Practice, Research.

Law, logistics, and inte…0Law, logistics, and international trade: 0 fractional worksChild and Adolescent Hea…0Child and Adolescent Health: 0 fractional worksBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders: 0 fractional worksDental Education, Practice, Research: 0 fractional worksTrigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments: 0 fractional worksTemporomandibular Joint Disorders: 0 fractional worksMedical and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional worksDental Health and Care U…0Dental Health and Care Utilization: 0 fractional worksEmpathy and Medical Education: 0 fractional worksSports injuries and prevention: 0 fractional works
AccountingGeneral Health ProfessionsNeurologyPathology and Forensic Medicine5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Law, logistics, and international trade Accounting 0 works
  2. 2 Child and Adolescent Health General Health Professions 0 works
  3. 3 Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders Neurology 0 works
  4. 4 Dental Education, Practice, Research General Health Professions 0 works
  5. 5 Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works
  6. 6 Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Complementary and Manual Therapy 0 works
  7. 7 Medical and Biological Sciences Anatomy 0 works
  8. 8 Dental Health and Care Utilization Periodontics 0 works
  9. 9 Empathy and Medical Education Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
  10. 10 Sports injuries and prevention Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available28.2%not open71.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors10.9%domestic only89.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 39% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000051% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie0.000021% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Enschede

All research institutions in Enschede

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Roessingh, Centrum voor Revalidatie. Posts are plain text and can be reported.