Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Archive · Lublin · Poland

Roztocze National Park

In research, Roztocze National Park stands highest in Plant Science (#1,599 of 2,489 worldwide), Life Sciences (#7,426 of 11,023 worldwide) and Environmental Science (#3,654 of 5,407 worldwide), over all time.

rpn.gov.plROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#20,971
of 22,385 · #18,689 all time
Rank in Poland
#239
of 255
Research works
533
▼ 18% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.6k
3.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.3%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.95×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
44%
world 40%
International
9%
world 18%
Roztocze National Park

What is Roztocze National Park known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Plant ScienceSubfield #1,599 of 2,489 1.9%125
Life SciencesDomain #7,426 of 11,023 2.8%206
Environmental ScienceField #3,654 of 5,407 7.2%120
Agricultural and Biological SciencesField #3,504 of 5,126 2.6%188
Social SciencesDomain #11,313 of 14,833 7.3%150
Physical SciencesDomain #15,400 of 17,446 6.6%155

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Roztocze National Park sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Roztocze National Park work in?

In 2022-now, 40% of research at Roztocze National Park is in Social Sciences, 30% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (23%), Environmental Science (20%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (17%). It does 1.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 28 fractional works · 40.5% of its workSocial Sciences: 16 fractional works · 22.9% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 4 fractional works · 6.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 3.5% of its workUrban Studies: 2 fractional works · 3.3% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workAnthropology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workLaw: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workCommunication: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLinguistics and Language: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 10 fractional works · 13.9% of its workHistory: 5 fractional works · 7.1% of its workArcheology: 2 fractional works · 2.9% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workReligious studies: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 21 fractional works · 30.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 14 fractional works · 20.5% of its workEcology: 5 fractional works · 7.3% of its workWater Science and Technology: 3 fractional works · 3.7% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEcological Modeling: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPollution: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEngineering: 3 fractional works · 4.0% of its workAerospace Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workAtmospheric Science: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSpace and Planetary Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLife Sciences: 16 fractional works · 22.6% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 12 fractional works · 16.8% of its workPlant Science: 6 fractional works · 9.0% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 4 fractional works · 5.5% of its workInsect Science: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 2.7% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workBiophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDevelopmental Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workParasitology: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workToxicology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Sciences: 5 fractional works · 6.9% of its workMedicine: 4 fractional works · 5.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workALL ITS WORKRoztocze NationalPark70fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences23%Physical Sciences30%Health Sciences7%Social Sciences40%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1622.9%
    2. Arts and Humanities1013.9%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance11.2%
    4. Psychology11.1%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting11.0%
    6. Decision Sciences00.5%
    1. Environmental Science1420.5%
    2. Engineering34.0%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences23.4%
    4. Physics and Astronomy11.4%
    5. Computer Science10.8%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1216.8%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology22.7%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology12.0%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics11.0%
    1. Medicine45.5%
    2. Health Professions10.9%
    3. Veterinary00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 3.54× its world share, 12 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.51× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 2.03× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 2.70× its world share, 1 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 0.10× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2.15× its world share, 2 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.27× its world share, 3 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 4.12× its world share, 14 worksEnvironmental SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 0.64× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.32× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.28× its world share, 4 worksMedicineVeterinary: 4.00× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryArts and Humanities: 4.80× its world share, 10 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.32× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.49× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.54× its world share, 1 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.36× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.81× its world share, 16 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 4.8×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 18 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities4.80×10 works
  2. Environmental Science4.12×14 works
  3. Veterinary4.00×0 works
  4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences3.54×12 works
  5. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.70×1 works
  6. Earth and Planetary Sciences2.15×2 works
  7. Immunology and Microbiology2.03×1 works
  8. Social Sciences1.81×16 works
  9. Physics and Astronomy0.64×1 works
  10. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.54×1 works
  11. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.51×2 works
  12. Decision Sciences0.49×0 works
  13. Psychology0.36×1 works
  14. Health Professions0.32×1 works
  15. Business, Management and Accounting0.32×1 works
  16. Medicine0.28×4 works
  17. Engineering0.27×3 works
  18. Computer Science0.10×1 works

Who are the top researchers at Roztocze National Park?

Ranked on the quality score, Jan Loch, Przemysław Stachyra and Wojciech Gruszka lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Roztocze National Park.

  1. 1 Jan Loch Poland · #2,097,596 worldwide 204 citations · 27 works
  2. 2 Przemysław Stachyra Poland · #3,581,239 worldwide 231 citations · 28 works
  3. 3 Wojciech Gruszka Poland · #3,705,932 worldwide 61 citations · 24 works
  4. 4 Zbigniew Maciejewski Poland · #4,033,082 worldwide 189 citations · 23 works
  5. 5 Antoni Zięba Poland · #4,845,050 worldwide 289 citations · 34 works
  6. 6 Anna Sołtys‐Lelek Poland · #6,128,917 worldwide 120 citations · 43 works
  7. 7 A. Klasa Poland · #6,438,947 worldwide 70 citations · 54 works
  8. 8 Ireneusz Włodarczyk Poland · #7,429,941 worldwide 177 citations · 99 works
All ranked researchers at Roztocze National Park

What are the most cited papers from Roztocze National Park?

The most cited paper from Roztocze National Park is "Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements" (Marlee A. Tucker et al., 2018), with 1,329 citations. Next come "A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation" (277) and "Large carnivore expansion in Europe is associated with human population density and land cover changes" (196).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements Marlee A. Tucker et al. · Science Open access115 authors 25 Jan 2018 1,329
2 A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation Michael James Noonan et al. · Ecological Monographs Open access 30 Nov 2018 277
3 Large carnivore expansion in Europe is associated with human population density and land cover changes Marta Cimatti et al. · Diversity and Distributions Open access 18 Jan 2021 196
4 Brown bear attacks on humans: a worldwide perspective Giulia Bombieri et al. · Scientific Reports Open access 12 Jun 2019 164
5 Response of ground-nesting farmland birds to agricultural intensification across Europe: Landscape and field level management factors Irene Guerrero, Manuel B. Morales, Juan J. Oñate et al. · Biological Conservation Open access 23 Jun 2012 126
All 61 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Roztocze National Park?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Biodiversity, Invasive Species, Conservation, Ecology, Urban Development, Vegetation and Flora.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Climate Change10▲ 5.2×20 topics
  2. Biodiversity8▲ 15×9 topics
  3. Invasive Species8▲ 25×12 topics
  4. Conservation5▲ 18×4 topics
  5. Ecology5▲ 42×4 topics
  6. Urban Development5▲ 19×3 topics
  7. Vegetation4▲ 52×2 topics
  8. Flora4▲ 206×1 topic
  9. Vascular Plants4▲ 206×1 topic
  10. Eastern European culture4▲ 401×1 topic
  11. Polish nobility4▲ 401×1 topic
  12. Community Participation3▲ 14×2 topics
  13. Education3▲ 2.6×7 topics
  14. Water Quality3▲ 11×5 topics
  15. Cultural Heritage3▲ 7.5×4 topics
  16. Human Rights3▲ 3.6×8 topics
  17. Biodiversity Conservation2▲ 9.0×7 topics
  18. Biogeography2▲ 12×10 topics
  19. Taxonomy2▲ 23×9 topics
  20. Cultural Tourism2▲ 545×1 topic
  21. Eutrophication2▲ 30×2 topics
  22. Sustainable Urban Futures2▲ 545×1 topic
  23. Molecular Phylogeny2▲ 19×7 topics
  24. Catchment Management2▲ 1017×1 topic
  25. Groundwater Hydrology2▲ 1017×1 topic
  26. Eastern Europe2▲ 55×2 topics
  27. Environmental Protection2▲ 57×4 topics
  28. Nationalism2▲ 6.3×3 topics
  29. Soviet Union2▲ 52×2 topics
  30. Habitat Selection2▲ 35×2 topics
  31. Migration2▲ 7.4×2 topics
  32. Phylogeny2▲ 15×7 topics
  33. Polish history2▲ 107×1 topic
  34. Polish minority2▲ 107×1 topic
  35. Population Dynamics2▲ 9.8×4 topics
  36. Global Change2▲ 8.9×4 topics
  37. European Union Law2▲ 144×2 topics
  38. Public Administration2▲ 28×2 topics
  39. Species Richness2▲ 35×2 topics
  40. Land Use1▲ 37×2 topics

Which research topics does Roztocze National Park publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Botany and Plant Ecology Studies, Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland, Urban Development and Cultural Heritage and Integrated Water Resources Management.

Botany and Plant Ecology Studies: 4 fractional worksHistorical and Cultural Studies of Poland: 4 fractional worksUrban Development and Cultural Heritage: 2 fractional worksIntegrated Water Resources Management: 2 fractional worksPolish Historical and Cultural Studies: 2 fractional worksMedieval European Histor…1Medieval European History and Architecture: 1 fractional worksCentral European Literary Studies: 1 fractional worksLocal Governance and Planning: 1 fractional worksSpecies Distribution and Climate Change: 1 fractional worksWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation: 1 fractional works
Plant ScienceHistoryUrban StudiesWater Science and Technology6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Botany and Plant Ecology Studies Plant Science 4 works
  2. 2 Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland History 4 works
  3. 3 Urban Development and Cultural Heritage Urban Studies 2 works
  4. 4 Integrated Water Resources Management Water Science and Technology 2 works
  5. 5 Polish Historical and Cultural Studies Political Science and International Relations 2 works
  6. 6 Medieval European History and Architecture Archeology 1 works
  7. 7 Central European Literary Studies Anthropology 1 works
  8. 8 Local Governance and Planning Geography, Planning and Development 1 works
  9. 9 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 1 works
  10. 10 Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation Ecology 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available44.2%not open55.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors9.1%domestic only90.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Roztocze National Park's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 18% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Roztocze National Park as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00026% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%Roztocze National Park0.00030% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Roztocze National Park over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

5%10%all institutions10.0% in 2023Roztocze National Park6.9% in 202320102020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 7.8% in 2021.

Other research institutions in Lublin

All research institutions in Lublin

Share Roztocze National Park's ranking

Roztocze National Park on Science Explorer

A card with Roztocze National Park's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Roztocze National Park. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.