Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Towson · United States

Success for All Foundation

successforall.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
14
▲ 58% vs 2018-21
Citations
1.1k
82.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
22.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
16%
world 40%
International
37%
world 18%
Success for All Foundation

Not ranked overall: Success for All Foundation is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Success for All Foundation work in?

In all years, 77% of research at Success for All Foundation is in Social Sciences, 18% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Psychology (33%), Social Sciences (31%), Environmental Science (11%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 11 fractional works · 77.2% of its workPsychology: 5 fractional works · 33.3% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 4 fractional works · 27.4% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 31.2% of its workEducation: 4 fractional works · 28.7% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 3.6% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 17.8% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 11.3% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 3.6% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 2.8% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workALL ITS WORKSuccess for AllFoundation14fractional works, all years
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences18%Health Sciences2%Social Sciences77%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 13 fields, with their numbers
    1. Psychology533.3%
    2. Social Sciences431.2%
    3. Decision Sciences17.6%
    4. Arts and Humanities03.6%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.3%
    6. Business, Management and Accounting00.3%
    1. Environmental Science211.3%
    2. Computer Science03.6%
    3. Mathematics02.8%
    1. Neuroscience02.4%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.1%
    1. Health Professions01.7%
    2. Medicine00.8%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.33× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Environmental Science: 12.72× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.31× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsDecision Sciences: 0.84× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 3.81× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 2.68× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.35× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 12.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Environmental Science12.72×1 works
  2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance3.81×0 works
  3. Psychology2.68×0 works
  4. Social Sciences1.35×0 works
  5. Decision Sciences0.84×0 works
  6. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.33×0 works
  7. Health Professions0.31×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Success for All Foundation?

The most cited paper from Success for All Foundation is "A Synthesis of Research on Language of Reading Instruction for English Language Learners" (Robert E. Slavin, Alan Cheung, 2005), with 488 citations. Next come "The Relationship Between Sample Sizes and Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews in Education" (361) and "Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis" (350).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A Synthesis of Research on Language of Reading Instruction for English Language Learners Robert E. Slavin, Alan Cheung · Review of Educational Research Jun 2005 488
2 The Relationship Between Sample Sizes and Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews in Education Robert E. Slavin, Dewi Smith · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Review Dec 2009 361
3 Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis Robert E. Slavin, Cynthia Lake, Susan Davis et al. · Educational Research Review 20 Jul 2010 350
4 Effective Reading Programs for the Elementary Grades: A Best-Evidence Synthesis Robert E. Slavin, Cynthia Lake, Bette Chambers et al. · Review of Educational Research 2 Nov 2009 312
5 Final Reading Outcomes of the National Randomized Field Trial of Success for All Geoffrey D. Borman, Robert E. Slavin, Alan Cheung et al. · American Educational Research Journal Sep 2007 220
All 37 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Success for All Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Species Distribution and Climate Change, Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology and Economic and Environmental Valuation.

Species Distribution and…0Species Distribution and Climate Change: 0 fractional worksAquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity: 0 fractional worksRangeland Management and Livestock Ecology: 0 fractional worksEconomic and Environmental Valuation: 0 fractional worksConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management: 0 fractional worksForest Management and Po…0Forest Management and Policy: 0 fractional worksHigher Education Research Studies: 0 fractional worksMentoring and Academic Development: 0 fractional worksEducation and Military I…0Education and Military Integration: 0 fractional works
Ecological ModelingEcologyManagement, Monitoring, Policy and LawEconomics and Econometrics3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Species Distribution and Climate Change Ecological Modeling 0 works
  2. 2 Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecology 0 works
  3. 3 Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
  4. 4 Economic and Environmental Valuation Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  5. 5 Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  6. 6 Forest Management and Policy Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  7. 7 Higher Education Research Studies Education 0 works
  8. 8 Mentoring and Academic Development Social Psychology 0 works
  9. 9 Education and Military Integration Education 0 works
  10. 10 Fish Ecology and Management Studies Nature and Landscape Conservation 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available15.5%not open84.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors36.8%domestic only63.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Success for All Foundation's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 58% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020052010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Success for All Foundation as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000016% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%Success for All Foundation0.0000085% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Success for All Foundation over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Towson

All research institutions in Towson

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Success for All Foundation. Posts are plain text and can be reported.