Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Delft · Netherlands

Systematic (Netherlands)

In research, Systematic (Netherlands) stands highest in Social Sciences (#7,791 of 14,833 worldwide) and Arts and Humanities (#2,354 of 3,511 worldwide), over all time.

systemat-ic.comROR OpenAlex
World rank, all time
#17,498
of 34,923
Rank in Netherlands
#227
of 407
Research works
490
▼ 58% vs 2018-21
Citations
5.1k
10.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.6%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
0.90×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
24%
world 40%
International
20%
world 18%
Systematic (Netherlands)

What is Systematic (Netherlands) known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #7,791 of 14,833 8.6%271
Arts and HumanitiesField #2,354 of 3,511 8.7%135

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Systematic (Netherlands) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Systematic (Netherlands) work in?

In 2022-now, 55% of research at Systematic (Netherlands) is in Life Sciences, 20% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Agricultural and Biological Sciences (42%), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (11%), Arts and Humanities (10%). It does 2.8× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 17 fractional works · 54.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 13 fractional works · 42.5% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 7 fractional works · 23.5% of its workInsect Science: 4 fractional works · 11.8% of its workPlant Science: 2 fractional works · 6.9% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 3 fractional works · 11.3% of its workGenetics: 3 fractional works · 9.1% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 6 fractional works · 20.5% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 7.3% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 7.3% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEcological Modeling: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workPaleontology: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Materials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 6 fractional works · 20.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 3 fractional works · 10.2% of its workPhilosophy: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workReligious studies: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 9.4% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 4.8% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKSystematic(Netherlands)31fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences55%Physical Sciences20%Health Sciences4%Social Sciences20%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1342.5%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology311.3%
    3. Neuroscience01.1%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.1%
    1. Engineering27.3%
    2. Environmental Science27.3%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences13.5%
    4. Computer Science01.6%
    5. Materials Science00.8%
    1. Arts and Humanities310.2%
    2. Social Sciences39.4%
    3. Psychology00.5%
    1. Medicine13.3%
    2. Health Professions01.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 8.94× its world share, 13 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2.11× its world share, 4 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.66× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.21× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2.24× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.48× its world share, 2 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.46× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.23× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.17× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 3.54× its world share, 3 worksArts and HumanitiesPsychology: 0.18× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.74× its world share, 3 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 8.9×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 14 fields, with their numbers
  1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences8.94×13 works
  2. Arts and Humanities3.54×3 works
  3. Earth and Planetary Sciences2.24×1 works
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology2.11×4 works
  5. Environmental Science1.46×2 works
  6. Social Sciences0.74×3 works
  7. Neuroscience0.66×0 works
  8. Engineering0.48×2 works
  9. Health Professions0.41×0 works
  10. Materials Science0.23×0 works
  11. Computer Science0.21×0 works
  12. Psychology0.18×0 works
  13. Medicine0.17×1 works
  14. Immunology and Microbiology0.13×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Systematic (Netherlands)?

Ranked on the quality score, Hiltje Maas and C Queree lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Systematic (Netherlands).

  1. 1 Hiltje Maas Netherlands · #2,550,411 worldwide 452 citations · 15 works
  2. 2 C Queree Netherlands · #5,248,590 worldwide 33 citations · 29 works
All ranked researchers at Systematic (Netherlands)

What are the most cited papers from Systematic (Netherlands)?

The most cited paper from Systematic (Netherlands) is "Resolution of the Early Placental Mammal Radiation Using Bayesian Phylogenetics" (William J. Murphy, Eduardo Eizirik, Stephen J. O’Brien et al., 2001), with 1,311 citations. Next come "THE BERING LAND BRIDGE" (361) and "Linking Breeding and Wintering Ranges of a Migratory Songbird Using Stable Isotopes" (301).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Resolution of the Early Placental Mammal Radiation Using Bayesian Phylogenetics William J. Murphy, Eduardo Eizirik, Stephen J. O’Brien et al. · Science 14 Dec 2001 1,311
2 THE BERING LAND BRIDGE F. P. Jonker · Taxon Feb 1968 361
3 Linking Breeding and Wintering Ranges of a Migratory Songbird Using Stable Isotopes Dustin R. Rubenstein, C. Page Chamberlain, Richard T. Holmes et al. · Science 8 Feb 2002 301
4 Urban coral reefs: Degradation and resilience of hard coral assemblages in coastal cities of East and Southeast Asia Eliza C. Heery et al. · Marine Pollution Bulletin Open access Aug 2018 275
5 The distribution of benthic marine algae in relation to the temperature regulation of their life histories C. van den Hoek · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society Sep 1982 255
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Systematic (Netherlands)?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Phylogeny, Taxonomy, DNA Barcoding, Evolution, Biogeography, Biological Control, Invasive Species and Biodiversity.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Phylogeny8▲ 147×14 topics
  2. Taxonomy6▲ 145×11 topics
  3. DNA Barcoding6▲ 110×9 topics
  4. Evolution6▲ 67×9 topics
  5. Biogeography5▲ 56×13 topics
  6. Biological Control4▲ 85×7 topics
  7. Biodiversity4▲ 16×11 topics
  8. Invasive Species4▲ 29×14 topics
  9. Morphology3▲ 61×4 topics
  10. Coleoptera3▲ 380×2 topics
  11. Diversification3▲ 206×2 topics
  12. Speciation3▲ 196×2 topics
  13. beetles3▲ 515×1 topic
  14. Climate Change2▲ 3.0×13 topics
  15. Cryptic Species2▲ 280×2 topics
  16. Lepidoptera2▲ 369×1 topic
  17. Molecular Phylogenetics2▲ 369×1 topic
  18. Molecular Phylogeny2▲ 34×5 topics
  19. Aesthetics2▲ 68×3 topics
  20. Philosophy2▲ 12×5 topics
  21. Religion2▲ 12×4 topics
  22. Ecosystem Functioning2▲ 23×5 topics
  23. Visual Culture2▲ 89×2 topics
  24. Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatiles1▲ 97×1 topic
  25. Identity1▲ 5.9×3 topics
  26. Jasmonate Signaling1▲ 97×1 topic
  27. Phylogenetics1▲ 83×2 topics
  28. Art1▲ 42×2 topics
  29. Halyomorpha halys1▲ 535×1 topic
  30. Stink Bug1▲ 535×1 topic
  31. Amber Fossils1▲ 346×1 topic
  32. Conservation1▲ 8.6×8 topics
  33. Insect Evolution1▲ 346×1 topic
  34. Neotropical Region1▲ 197×2 topics
  35. Phylogenetic Analysis1▲ 12×5 topics
  36. Christian-Jewish Relations1▲ 637×1 topic
  37. Photography1▲ 84×1 topic
  38. Public Sphere1▲ 58×1 topic
  39. Religious Politics1▲ 637×1 topic
  40. Secularism1▲ 32×1 topic

Which research topics does Systematic (Netherlands) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution, Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control and Hemiptera Insect Studies.

Coleoptera Taxonomy and …3Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution: 3 fractional worksLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy: 2 fractional worksInsect-Plant Interactions and Control: 1 fractional worksHemiptera Insect Studies: 1 fractional worksFossil Insects in Amber: 1 fractional worksArt, Aesthetics, and Perception: 1 fractional worksReligion, Theology, Hist…1Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity: 1 fractional worksReligion and Society Interactions: 1 fractional worksForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies: 1 fractional worksScarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography: 1 fractional works
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsGeneticsInsect ScienceVisual Arts and Performing Arts3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3 works
  2. 2 Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy Genetics 2 works
  3. 3 Insect-Plant Interactions and Control Insect Science 1 works
  4. 4 Hemiptera Insect Studies Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1 works
  5. 5 Fossil Insects in Amber Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1 works
  6. 6 Art, Aesthetics, and Perception Visual Arts and Performing Arts 1 works
  7. 7 Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  8. 8 Religion and Society Interactions Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  9. 9 Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies Insect Science 1 works
  10. 10 Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography Paleontology 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available24.5%not open75.5%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors19.8%domestic only80.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Systematic (Netherlands)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 58% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Systematic (Netherlands) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00013% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%Systematic (Netherlands)0.00013% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Systematic (Netherlands) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

5%10%15%all institutions10.0% in 2020Systematic (Netherlands)6.5% in 202020102020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 10.6% in 2009.

Other research institutions in Delft

All research institutions in Delft

Share Systematic (Netherlands)'s ranking

Systematic (Netherlands) on Science Explorer

A card with Systematic (Netherlands)'s standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Systematic (Netherlands). Posts are plain text and can be reported.