Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Argentine historical studies

Argentine historical studies is a research topic within Cultural Studies. Science Explorer counts 6.1k research works in it since 1950. 12.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers covers a wide range of topics related to the cultural and social history of Argentina, including the role of intellectuals, political movements like Peronism, gender dynamics, economic developments, and public health initiatives. It provides a comprehensive view of the historical, cultural, and social forces that have shaped Argentina.

  • Argentina
  • Cultural
  • Social
  • History
  • Intellectuals
  • Politics
  • Peronism
  • Gender
  • Economy
  • Public Health
Research works
6.1k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
782
per year above
Top-10% rate
12.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+6%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Argentine historical studies research?

By volume, Argentina and Spain publish the most (642 and 63 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Argentina 642 works
  2. 2 Spain 63 works
  3. 3 Mexico 40 works
  4. 4 United States 36 works
  5. 5 Chile 33 works
  6. 6 Peru 32 works
  7. 7 Brazil 24 works
  8. 8 France 23 works
  9. 9 Uruguay 13 works
  10. 10 Colombia 12 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Argentina: 69.9%Spain: 6.8%Mexico: 4.3%United States: 4.0%6 others listed: 15.0%70%largest
Argentina642 · 69.9%Spain63 · 6.8%Mexico40 · 4.3%United States36 · 4.0%6 others listed138 · 15.0%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Argentine historical studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas publishes the most Argentine historical studies research, followed by Universidad de Buenos Aires and Universidad Nacional de La Plata.

Who are the leading researchers in Argentine historical studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Argentine historical studies include Jonathan C. Brown, Joël L. Horowitz and Paul Goodwin.

  1. 1 Jonathan C. Brown United Kingdom 921 citations
  2. 2 Joël L. Horowitz United States 562 citations
  3. 3 Paul Goodwin United Kingdom 520 citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Argentine historical studies research done?

The largest centres of Argentine historical studies research in 2022–2025 are Buenos Aires (Argentina), La Plata (Argentina), Madrid (Spain) and Córdoba (Argentina). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Bernal, Tarapoto and San Miguel de Tucumán.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Buenos Aires Argentina 285 works
  2. 2 La Plata Argentina 52 works
  3. 3 Madrid Spain 36 works
  4. 4 Córdoba Argentina 36 works
  5. 5 Rosario Argentina 32 works
  6. 6 San Miguel de Tucumán Argentina 30 works
  7. 7 Bernal Argentina 23 works
  8. 8 Santiago Chile 23 works
  9. 9 Tarapoto Peru 20 works
  10. 10 Mexico City Mexico 19 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. BernalAR · 23.1 works715×
  2. TarapotoPE · 20.2 works450×
  3. San Miguel de TucumánAR · 30.3 works275×
  4. RosarioAR · 31.7 works249×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Argentine historical studies than the world average.

See Argentine historical studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Argentine historical studies?

Among universities, judged by research, Universidad de la República de Uruguay, Universidad Nacional de San Martín and Universidad de Buenos Aires score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 12.26%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universidad de la República de Uruguay: 9, 20.3%Universidad Nacional de San Martín: 20, 15.4%Universidad de Buenos Aires: 80, 7.6%National University of Rosario: 31, 10.9%Universidad Nacional de La Plata: 49, 10.4%National University of Tres de Febrero: 11, 7.4%National University of General Sarmiento: 14, 13.2%National University of Luján: 9, 18.2%National University of Tucumán: 13, 12.2%National University of General San Martín: 16, 7.0%Universidad de la Re…Universidad Nacional…National University …Universidad de Bueno…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universidad de la República de UruguayUruguay 68.420.3%42.7×9 +81.9%
2 Universidad Nacional de San MartínPeru 66.815.4%450.6×20 +87.9%
3 Universidad de Buenos AiresArgentina 59.77.6%218.6×80 +41.0%
4 National University of RosarioArgentina 57.810.9%354.3×31 +61.4%
5 Universidad Nacional de La PlataArgentina 56.810.4%266.0×49 +12.2%
6 National University of Tres de FebreroArgentina 54.97.4%596.7×11 +157.0%
7 National University of General SarmientoArgentina 53.313.2%631.0×14 +56.5%
8 National University of LujánArgentina 53.218.2%617.0×9 +17.2%
9 National University of TucumánArgentina 51.312.2%345.3×13 +25.3%
10 National University of General San MartínArgentina 49.47.0%392.1×16 +28.3%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Argentine historical studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 6% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Argentine historical studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.