Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Analytical Chemistry

Dye analysis and toxicity

Dye analysis and toxicity is a research topic within Analytical Chemistry. Science Explorer counts 18k research works in it since 1950. 13.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the analysis, safety, and regulatory aspects of synthetic food colorants, including their determination in various food products using techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography and electrochemical sensors. The papers also discuss the health safety issues, genotoxic effects, and regulatory reviews related to artificial food colors.

  • Food Colorants
  • Synthetic Dyes
  • High-Performance Liquid Chromatography
  • Health Safety
  • Toxicity Assessment
  • Electrochemical Sensor
  • Genotoxic Effect
  • Regulatory Review
  • Artificial Food Colors
  • Adverse Effects
Research works
18k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.5k
per year above
Top-10% rate
13.9%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+31%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Dye analysis and toxicity research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (511 and 482 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 511 works
  2. 2 India 482 works
  3. 3 Brazil 280 works
  4. 4 Türkiye 190 works
  5. 5 United States 184 works
  6. 6 Iran 154 works
  7. 7 Egypt 138 works
  8. 8 Iraq 104 works
  9. 9 Indonesia 91 works
  10. 10 Pakistan 89 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 23.0%India: 21.7%Brazil: 12.6%Türkiye: 8.6%6 others listed: 34.2%23%largest
China511 · 23.0%India482 · 21.7%Brazil280 · 12.6%Türkiye190 · 8.6%6 others listed761 · 34.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Dye analysis and toxicity research?

By volume in 2022–2025, King Saud University publishes the most Dye analysis and toxicity research, followed by North Carolina State University and University of Baghdad.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 King Saud UniversitySaudi Arabia 21 works
  2. 2 North Carolina State UniversityUnited States 18 works
  3. 3 University of BaghdadIraq 17 works
  4. 4 Saveetha UniversityIndia 15 works
  5. 5 Universidade de São PauloBrazil 12 works
  6. 6 National Research CentreEgypt 12 works
  7. 7 Cairo UniversityEgypt 11 works
  8. 8 Ain Shams UniversityEgypt 11 works
  9. 9 Universidade Estadual de MaringáBrazil 10 works
  10. 10 Jiangsu UniversityChina 9 works

Who are the leading researchers in Dye analysis and toxicity?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Dye analysis and toxicity include David Julian McClements and Fereidoon Shahidi.

  1. 1 David Julian McClements United States 4.1k citations
  2. 2 Fereidoon Shahidi Canada 2.2k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Dye analysis and toxicity research done?

The largest centres of Dye analysis and toxicity research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Chennai (India), São Paulo (Brazil) and Tehran (Iran).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 65 works
  2. 2 Chennai India 44 works
  3. 3 São Paulo Brazil 43 works
  4. 4 Tehran Iran 42 works
  5. 5 Cairo Egypt 38 works
  6. 6 Baghdad Iraq 34 works
  7. 7 Riyadh Saudi Arabia 32 works
  8. 8 Giza Egypt 29 works
  9. 9 Shanghai China 26 works
  10. 10 New Delhi India 25 works
See Dye analysis and toxicity on the map

Where is the best place to study Dye analysis and toxicity?

Among universities, judged by research, King Saud University, Mansoura University and North Carolina State University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 18.99%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →King Saud University: 21, 23.2%Mansoura University: 8, 40.4%North Carolina State University: 18, 5.9%Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi: 8, 19.0%Saveetha University: 15, 24.5%Jiangsu University: 9, 41.7%Cairo University: 11, 15.2%Universidade Estadual de Maringá: 10, 10.0%University of Baghdad: 17, 5.9%Ain Shams University: 11, 4.1%Mansoura UniversityKing Saud UniversitySivas Cumhuriyet Üni…North Carolina State…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 King Saud UniversitySaudi Arabia 66.823.2%6.4×21 +79.2%
2 Mansoura UniversityEgypt 58.740.4%5.0×8 +205.3%
3 North Carolina State UniversityUnited States 49.25.9%8.8×18 +72.9%
4 Sivas Cumhuriyet ÜniversitesiTürkiye 45.819.0%9.3×8 +114.7%
5 Saveetha UniversityIndia 45.324.5%4.3×15 —
6 Jiangsu UniversityChina 42.141.7%3.4×9 -8.1%
7 Cairo UniversityEgypt 41.815.2%4.1×11 +442.0%
8 Universidade Estadual de MaringáBrazil 40.910.0%11.6×10 +35.3%
9 University of BaghdadIraq 40.05.9%6.5×17 +91.2%
10 Ain Shams UniversityEgypt 30.54.1%4.3×11 +542.4%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Dye analysis and toxicity research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 31% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2024. The fastest-growing topics are Dye analysis and toxicity.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.