Evaluation Methods in Various Fields
Evaluation Methods in Various Fields is a research topic within Ecological Modeling. Science Explorer counts 33k research works in it since 1952. 2.9% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers focuses on the application of fuzzy modeling, analytic hierarchy process, and entropy weight decision-making in various environmental and energy-related domains. It also explores the use of tree shrews as an emerging model for human diseases, particularly lung cancer. Additionally, it addresses topics such as urban green transportation planning, power quality monitoring systems, and residential electricity demand responses.
- Fuzzy Modeling
- Analytic Hierarchy Process
- Entropy Weight
- Power Network Structure Assessment
- Tree Shrews
- Seismic Reservoir Rules Extraction
- Urban Green Transportation Planning
- Power Quality Monitoring System
- Lung Cancer Model
- Electricity Demand Response
- Research works
- 33k fractional, since 1952
- In the world top 10%
- 943 per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 2.9% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -73% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research?
By volume, China and ?? publish the most (1.5k and 40 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 China 1.5k works
- 2 ?? 40 works
- 3 India 36 works
- 4 Vietnam 35 works
- 5 United States 30 works
- 6 Japan 16 works
- 7 South Korea 15 works
- 8 United Kingdom 12 works
- 9 Indonesia 11 works
- 10 Australia 9 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research?
By volume in 2022–2025, State Grid Corporation of China (China) publishes the most Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research, followed by North China Electric Power University and China Southern Power Grid (China).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 State Grid Corporation of China (China) China 48 works
- 2 North China Electric Power University China 39 works
- 3 China Southern Power Grid (China) China 38 works
- 4 Shanghai Electric (China) China 29 works
- 5 Beijing Jiaotong University China 15 works
- 6 Tongji University China 14 works
- 7 Wuhan University of Technology China 14 works
- 8 Chang'an University China 11 works
- 9 Sichuan University China 11 works
- 10 Shenyang Jianzhu University China 11 works
Who are the leading researchers in Evaluation Methods in Various Fields?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Evaluation Methods in Various Fields include Zeshui Xu, Yan Xu and Jun Zhang.
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research done?
The largest centres of Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Guangzhou (China) and Wuhan (China).
Where is the best place to study Evaluation Methods in Various Fields?
Among universities, judged by research, Wuhan University of Technology, North China Electric Power University and Hohai University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wuhan University of Technology China | 62.0 | 15.4% | 10.0× | 14 | -82.7% |
| 2 | North China Electric Power University China | 57.7 | 7.2% | 33.5× | 39 | -61.1% |
| 3 | Hohai University China | 56.7 | 13.6% | 9.8× | 9 | -82.4% |
| 4 | Anhui University China | 54.1 | 14.0% | 11.0× | 9 | -90.6% |
| 5 | Beijing Jiaotong University China | 53.7 | 10.0% | 14.0× | 15 | -70.7% |
| 6 | Chongqing Jiaotong University China | 52.7 | 13.4% | 29.1× | 9 | -91.6% |
| 7 | Zhengzhou University China | 50.3 | 17.8% | 6.3× | 9 | -85.5% |
| 8 | Tongji University China | 48.6 | 12.5% | 6.4× | 14 | -82.9% |
| 9 | Lanzhou Jiaotong University China | 46.1 | 12.3% | 20.0× | 8 | -81.3% |
| 10 | Chang'an University China | 42.5 | 4.4% | 17.3× | 11 | -80.9% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 73% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2011.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.