Science Explorer Back to mapMap

Evaluation Methods in Various Fields

Evaluation Methods in Various Fields is a research topic within Ecological Modeling. Science Explorer counts 33k research works in it since 1952. 9.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the application of fuzzy modeling, analytic hierarchy process, and entropy weight decision-making in various environmental and energy-related domains. It also explores the use of tree shrews as an emerging model for human diseases, particularly lung cancer. Additionally, it addresses topics such as urban green transportation planning, power quality monitoring systems, and residential electricity demand responses.

  • Fuzzy Modeling
  • Analytic Hierarchy Process
  • Entropy Weight
  • Power Network Structure Assessment
  • Tree Shrews
  • Seismic Reservoir Rules Extraction
  • Urban Green Transportation Planning
  • Power Quality Monitoring System
  • Lung Cancer Model
  • Electricity Demand Response
Research works
33k
fractional, since 1952
In the world top 10%
3.2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
9.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2018-21 → 2022-25
+46%
the tick is no change
Largest producer
China
88% of the 10 largest, 2022-now
Evaluation Methods in Various Fields

Which countries lead Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research?

By volume, China and ?? publish the most (1.5k and 40 works in 2022-now).

By volume, 2022-now

  1. 1 China 1.5k works
  2. 2 ?? 40 works
  3. 3 India 36 works
  4. 4 Vietnam 35 works
  5. 5 United States 30 works
  6. 6 Japan 16 works
  7. 7 South Korea 15 works
  8. 8 United Kingdom 12 works
  9. 9 Indonesia 11 works
  10. 10 Australia 9 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 88.3%??: 2.3%India: 2.0%Vietnam: 2.0%6 others listed: 5.3%88%largest
China1,547 · 88.3%??40 · 2.3%India36 · 2.0%Vietnam35 · 2.0%6 others listed94 · 5.3%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research?

By volume in 2022-now, State Grid Corporation of China (China) publishes the most Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research, followed by North China Electric Power University and China Southern Power Grid (China).

Who are the leading researchers in Evaluation Methods in Various Fields?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Evaluation Methods in Various Fields include Kai You Wang, Lei Jiang and Qiang Zhang.

  1. 1 Kai You Wang China 224k citations
  2. 2 Lei Jiang China 214k citations
  3. 3 Qiang Zhang China 184k citations
  4. 4 Huan Liu Australia 148k citations
  5. 5 Francisco Herrera Spain 141k citations
  6. 6 Li Yichong China 125k citations
  7. 7 Dongyuan Zhao China 123k citations
  8. 8 Hao Chen China 118k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

What are the most cited papers in Evaluation Methods in Various Fields?

The most cited paper in Evaluation Methods in Various Fields is "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP" (Da-Yong Chang, 1996), with 4,856 citations. Next come "Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators" (2,700) and "Boundary layer climates" (1,358).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP Da-Yong Chang · European Journal of Operational Research Dec 1996 4,856
2 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators Zeshui Xu · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems Dec 2007 2,700
3 Boundary layer climates Sherwood B. Idso · Agricultural Meteorology Jul 1980 1,358
4 The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications Fatemeh Mariam Zahedi · INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics Aug 1986 1,341
5 Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process Alessio Ishizaka, Ashraf Labib · Expert Systems with Applications May 2011 1,236
All 99 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Where is Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research done?

The largest centres of Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Guangzhou (China) and Wuhan (China).

Largest cities, 2022-now

  1. 1 BeijingChina 303 works
  2. 2 ShanghaiChina 106 works
  3. 3 GuangzhouChina 86 works
  4. 4 WuhanChina 71 works
  5. 5 NanjingChina 67 works
  6. 6 Xi'anChina 61 works
  7. 7 ChengduChina 44 works
  8. 8 JinanChina 42 works
  9. 9 ChongqingChina 42 works
  10. 10 TianjinChina 41 works
See Evaluation Methods in Various Fields on the map

Where is the best place to study Evaluation Methods in Various Fields?

Among universities, judged by research, North China Electric Power University, Southeast University and Wuhan University of Technology score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 14.58%fractional works in this field (log) →share of work in the world top 10% →Southeast UniversityWuhan University of …Tongji UniversityNorth China Electric…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the first ten of the table below, at the default weights. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

Excellenceshare of its work in the world top 10%, 2022-now and all time averaged
40%
Specialisationhow much of its work is in this field, counted up to 10× the world share
10%
Sizeits output in this field, on a log scale
30%
Growthoutput growth, counted from -20% to +20%
10%
Internationalshare of its work with a co-author abroad
10%
Each slider sets a weight; the share it gets of the score is beside it.
#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1North China Electric Power UniversityChina 75.48.2%37.8×39 -16.5%
2Southeast UniversityChina 67.316.2%4.5×10 +11.7%
3Wuhan University of TechnologyChina 61.813.8%11.2×14 +11.7%
4Tongji UniversityChina 58.79.1%6.0×14 +17.2%
5Beijing Jiaotong UniversityChina 57.111.9%15.8×15 -38.9%
6Zhengzhou UniversityChina 56.921.4%5.2×10 +233.0%
7Wuhan UniversityChina 56.921.2%3.8×8 +5.6%
8Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityChina 54.317.0%2.1×9 +40.1%
9Sichuan UniversityChina 49.715.3%3.2×11 -7.3%
10Beijing University of TechnologyChina 47.211.7%8.8×10 +18.8%

Universities only. The score blends excellence (40%), size (30%), specialisation (10%), growth (10%), international reach (10%), 2022-now; growth compares 2018-21 with 2022-25 and counts up to +20%, since a jump from a small base is mostly noise.

Every institution in Evaluation Methods in Various Fields, country by country

Is Evaluation Methods in Various Fields research growing?

Output in 2022-2025 was 46% higher than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2011. The fastest-growing topics are Evaluation Methods in Various Fields.

still counting19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Evaluation Methods in Various Fields as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.012% in 2024.

still counting0.050%0.10%0.15%Evaluation Methods in Various Fields0.0076% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Evaluation Methods in Various Fields over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year.

still counting5%10%15%Evaluation Methods in Various Fields10.3% in 2025200020102020

Of each year's works in it, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. A field is the world for its own topics, so there is no other line to hold it against.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Evaluation Methods in Various Fields. Posts are plain text and can be reported.