Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies is a research topic within Complementary and alternative medicine. Science Explorer counts 43k research works in it since 1950. 6.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores the integration of traditional medicine, such as Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ayurveda, with modern scientific approaches. It covers topics such as syndrome differentiation, herbal formulae, tongue diagnosis, constitutional typology, genomic analysis, and precision medicine. The focus is on understanding the principles and applications of traditional medicine in the context of contemporary healthcare.
- Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Ayurveda
- Syndrome Differentiation
- Herbal Formulae
- Integrative Medicine
- Tongue Diagnosis
- Constitutional Typology
- Genomic Analysis
- Precision Medicine
- Health Maintenance
- Research works
- 43k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 2.6k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 6.1% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -52% the tick is no change
This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.
Which countries lead Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies research?
By volume, China and India publish the most (2.8k and 788 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 China 2.8k works
- 2 India 788 works
- 3 United States 283 works
- 4 South Korea 265 works
- 5 Japan 110 works
- 6 Indonesia 96 works
- 7 Taiwan 68 works
- 8 United Kingdom 61 works
- 9 Türkiye 54 works
- 10 Iran 39 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College publishes the most Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies research, followed by Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine and Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina 102 works
- 2 Shaanxi University of Chinese MedicineChina 97 works
- 3 Beijing University of Chinese MedicineChina 95 works
- 4 Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 59 works
- 5 Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 53 works
- 6 Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina 49 works
- 7 Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina 41 works
- 8 Guangzhou University of Chinese MedicineChina 40 works
- 9 Changchun University of Chinese MedicineChina 38 works
- 10 National Institute of AyurvedaIndia 35 works
Where is Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies research done?
The largest centres of Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Guangzhou (China) and Xianyang (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Xianyang, Amloh and Nanded.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- XianyangCN · 127.7 works112×
- AmlohIN · 24.2 works60×
- NandedIN · 29.9 works46×
- MalappuramIN · 28.5 works42×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies?
Among universities, judged by research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine and Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina | 60.9 | 22.1% | 61.2× | 59 | -82.6% |
| 2 | Beijing University of Chinese MedicineChina | 60.4 | 17.3% | 110.2× | 95 | -66.7% |
| 3 | Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina | 59.2 | 21.4% | 48.9× | 53 | -72.3% |
| 4 | Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina | 58.7 | 23.0% | 84.1× | 41 | -68.7% |
| 5 | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical CollegeChina | 58.6 | 13.1% | 21.4× | 102 | -60.3% |
| 6 | Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityChina | 57.1 | 24.1% | 23.7× | 30 | -70.7% |
| 7 | Guangzhou University of Chinese MedicineChina | 56.9 | 20.5% | 43.7× | 40 | -69.3% |
| 8 | Hunan University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChina | 54.2 | 22.1% | 71.4× | 26 | -70.5% |
| 9 | Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineChina | 53.7 | 15.7% | 39.8× | 49 | -73.7% |
| 10 | National Institute of AyurvedaIndia | 53.0 | 1.9% | 126.7× | 35 | +505.0% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 52% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2011.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.