Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Compare · Countries

Laos vs Mozambique

On research quality in 2022-now, Mozambique ranks #78 in the world and Laos #79, of 189 countries. Laos stands higher in 0 of the 6 fields both publish in, Mozambique in 6.

Research profiles alike: 0.58similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured

Compare other countries
vs

Laos

World rank, 2022-now
#79
#88 all time
Works, 2022-now
1.2k
fractional
Top-10% rate
7.2%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
66%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Parasitology, Forestry, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

Mozambique

World rank, 2022-now
#78
#90 all time
Works, 2022-now
4.5k
fractional
Top-10% rate
6.2%
share of its work among the world's most cited
Open access
73%
of its works free to read

Strongest relative focus: Anatomy, Forestry, Transportation.

Who leads, measure by measure?

Laos leads on 5 of 9 measures: excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, international co-authorship and growth. Mozambique leads on 3 of 9 measures: research quality, output and open access. The two are level on institutions in the world top 100.

Laos 51 level3 Mozambique
  1. #79Research qualityworld rank of 189 countries, 2022-now#78
  2. 0.96×Excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected0.80×
  3. 1.2kOutputfractional works, 2022-now4.5k
  4. 7.2%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited6.2%
  5. 11.8Citations per workall time, per fractional work6.4
  6. 0World top 100institutions it holds among the world's best 1000
  7. 66%Open accessof its works free to read, all time73%
  8. 56%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time54%
  9. +81%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+23%

A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.

Who leads in each field?

Laos stands higher in 0 of 6 fields, Mozambique in 6. Each bar is that side's standing among all countries ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.

Laos 06 Mozambique
  1. -Agricultural and Biological Sciences#85
  2. -Computer Science#104
  3. -Engineering#98
  4. -Environmental Science#80
  5. -Medicine#75
  6. -Social Sciences#68

Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.

The numbers behind each field

Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.

Field Laos rankMozambique rank Laos top 10%Mozambique top 10% Laos worksMozambique works
Agricultural and Biological Sciences - #85 - 7.2% - 288
Computer Science - #104 - 4.0% - 378
Engineering - #98 - 5.8% - 292
Environmental Science - #80 - 5.8% - 325
Medicine - #75 - 7.8% - 493
Social Sciences - #68 - 6.6% - 1.6k

What is each known for?

The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.

Laos

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology110▲ 1.87×113 topics
  2. Climate Change94▲ 2.3×89 topics
  3. Sustainability72▲ 2.0×75 topics
  4. Public Health47▲ 2.2×58 topics
  5. Environmental Impact47▲ 1.85×48 topics
  6. Biodiversity45▲ 4.0×31 topics
  7. Globalization44▲ 1.51×67 topics
  8. Sustainable Development39▲ 1.70×59 topics
  9. Education38▲ 1.51×69 topics
  10. Economic Development33▲ 2.8×20 topics
  11. Genetic Diversity28▲ 4.3×21 topics
  12. Biogeography27▲ 6.6×19 topics
  13. Pathogenesis26▲ 3.5×22 topics
  14. Antioxidant25▲ 2.5×41 topics
  15. Immune Response24▲ 2.9×22 topics
  16. Food Security23▲ 2.9×24 topics
  17. Vaccine Development23▲ 6.0×11 topics
  18. Biodiversity Conservation22▲ 4.0×14 topics
  19. Democracy22▲ 4.3×14 topics
  20. Invasive Species22▲ 3.6×20 topics
  21. Health Education22▲ 3.5×11 topics
  22. Vaccine22▲ 3.7×11 topics
  23. Ethnic Identity20▲ 12×2 topics
  24. Medicinal Plants19▲ 3.3×18 topics
  25. Cultural Politics19▲ 19×2 topics
  26. Laos19▲ 91×1 topic
  27. Thailand19▲ 91×1 topic
  28. Anti-inflammatory18▲ 4.3×23 topics
  29. Monetary Policy18▲ 5.2×6 topics
  30. Land Use Change18▲ 4.0×8 topics
  31. Maternal Health17▲ 4.5×4 topics
  32. Economic Evaluation17▲ 9.9×2 topics
  33. Breastfeeding16▲ 4.8×3 topics
  34. Molecular Phylogeny16▲ 6.5×12 topics
  35. Financial Analysis15▲ 8.8×3 topics
  36. Market Competition15▲ 22×2 topics
  37. Asset Pricing14▲ 11×2 topics
  38. Panel Data Models14▲ 31×1 topic
  39. Stock Prices14▲ 46×1 topic
  40. Taxonomy14▲ 6.3×13 topics

Mozambique

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's
All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Educational Technology437▲ 7.0×44 topics
  2. Education396▲ 4.3×118 topics
  3. Sustainable Development388▲ 4.7×85 topics
  4. Pedagogy386▲ 14×28 topics
  5. Globalization372▲ 3.6×116 topics
  6. Sustainability358▲ 2.8×100 topics
  7. Teacher Training350▲ 11×27 topics
  8. Online Learning337▲ 7.6×25 topics
  9. E-Learning334▲ 6.5×21 topics
  10. Innovation311▲ 5.7×71 topics
  11. Distance Learning226▲ 12×13 topics
  12. Higher Education186▲ 6.6×26 topics
  13. Digital Literacy183▲ 6.0×11 topics
  14. History174▲ 4.7×39 topics
  15. Digitalization172▲ 16×13 topics
  16. Culture160▲ 5.7×25 topics
  17. Ethnicity158▲ 7.9×16 topics
  18. Literature157▲ 5.4×37 topics
  19. Inclusive Education154▲ 8.0×19 topics
  20. Digital Transformation154▲ 5.3×23 topics
  21. Public Policy149▲ 5.9×24 topics
  22. Digital Education140▲ 18×7 topics
  23. Economic Security138▲ 12×7 topics
  24. Legal Regulation138▲ 12×8 topics
  25. Language Teaching136▲ 9.5×8 topics
  26. Entrepreneurship130▲ 6.2×22 topics
  27. Foresight124▲ 18×2 topics
  28. Teaching Methods123▲ 14×11 topics
  29. Science122▲ 9.3×8 topics
  30. Islam120▲ 11×4 topics
  31. Social Influence118▲ 10×3 topics
  32. Modernization118▲ 12×3 topics
  33. Malay Language118▲ 16×1 topic
  34. Sharia Law118▲ 15×1 topic
  35. Educational Technologies117▲ 24×2 topics
  36. International Trade Law117▲ 17×2 topics
  37. Strategic Planning117▲ 15×3 topics
  38. Public Oversight116▲ 18×1 topic
  39. Transport Policy116▲ 18×1 topic
  40. Design116▲ 13×4 topics

Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.

How has their output grown?

Mozambique has out-published Laos every year since 1980.

still counting5001k1.5kMozambique971 in 2025Laos416 in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works per year.

Their share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.

still counting0.010%0.020%0.030%Mozambique0.017% in 2025Laos0.0071% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).

still counting10%20%Laos8.3% in 2025Mozambique7.6% in 2025200020102020

A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.

Who holds more of the world's best institutions?

A country's average quality and the number of institutions it holds at the very top can disagree, and both are worth knowing. The counts are nested: an institution in the top 50 is also in the top 100.

Laos 05 level0 Mozambique
  1. 0In the world top 500
  2. 0In the top 1000
  3. 0In the top 5000
  4. 0In the top 1,0000
  5. #51Elite capacityrank among 204 countries#51

Institutions ranked on research quality, 2022-now. Elite capacity counts a country's institutions by their worldwide rank, weighted so a place at #1 counts for more than one at #480.

Which publishes more research, Laos or Mozambique?

Mozambique publishes 3.7× as much research as Laos in 2022-now (4.5k against 1.2k fractional works).

Whose research has more impact, Laos or Mozambique?

7.2% of Laos's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 6.2% for Mozambique.

Is Laos or Mozambique growing faster?

Output in 2022-25 was +81% against 2018-21 for Laos, and +23% for Mozambique.

Which has more open access research, Laos or Mozambique?

73% of Mozambique's research is free to read, against 66% of Laos's.

Which has more world-class institutions, Laos or Mozambique?

Laos holds 0 of the world's top 100 research institutions and Mozambique 0; in the top 1,000 it is 0 against 0.

Which institutions lead in each country?

The highest-ranked institutions on each side on research quality, 2022-now. The percentage is each institution's own top-10% rate: the share of its works that are among the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. Every figure stands alone, so they do not add up to 100%.

Laos

  1. 1National University of Laos4.6% top 10% · 362 works
  2. 2Rural Development Agency7.7% top 10% · 144 works
  3. 3Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry8.4% top 10% · 213 works
  4. 4Ministry of Health6.3% top 10% · 120 works
  5. 5Souphanouvong University3.1% top 10% · 97 works
  6. 6National Institute of Public Health4.1% top 10% · 99 works

Mozambique

  1. 1Eduardo Mondlane University6.6% top 10% · 653 works
  2. 2Pedagogical University4.8% top 10% · 2.1k works
  3. 3Instituto Nacional de Saúde7.9% top 10% · 306 works
  4. 4Universidade Politecnica4.9% top 10% · 259 works
  5. 5Lúrio University8.1% top 10% · 197 works
  6. 6Catholic University of Mozambique4.3% top 10% · 133 works

The number is the rank inside the country. The track on each row is the top-10% rate; the tick is the average of all institutions, 10.0% (how it is set): teal above it, red below. The ranking is the quality score, which compares the rate with what each institution's own topics predict and adds a small reward for size, so the rates do not fall in order.

Who are the top researchers on each side?

The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.

Laos

  1. 1 Mayfong Mayxay #108,394 worldwide 33k citations · 323 works
  2. 2 Paul N. Newton #120,711 worldwide 47k citations · 583 works
  3. 3 Tamalee Roberts #271,991 worldwide 23k citations · 89 works
  4. 4 Koukeo Phommasone #403,495 worldwide 22k citations · 124 works
  5. 5 Thoumthone Vongvisouk #656,079 worldwide 786 citations · 32 works

Mozambique

  1. 1 Albertino Antonio Moura Damasceno #33,973 worldwide 64k citations · 338 works
  2. 2 Inácio Mandomando #104,696 worldwide 17k citations · 290 works
  3. 3 Ana Olga Mocumbi #117,838 worldwide 42k citations · 274 works
  4. 4 Albertino Damasceno #155,059 worldwide 14k citations · 29 works
  5. 5 Eusébio Macete #174,962 worldwide 7.4k citations · 120 works