Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Mountain View · United States

BrainAid (United States)

brainaid.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
16
▲ 51% vs 2018-21
Citations
404
25.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
44%
world 40%
International
17%
world 18%
BrainAid (United States)

Not ranked overall: BrainAid (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does BrainAid (United States) work in?

In all years, 34% of research at BrainAid (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 29% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (24%), Computer Science (21%), Social Sciences (14%).

Physical Sciences: 5 fractional works · 33.5% of its workComputer Science: 3 fractional works · 21.5% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 2 fractional works · 14.1% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 7.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workStatistical and Nonlinear Physics: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 28.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 13.9% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 9.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 11.7% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 9.6% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workGeneral Decision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 4 fractional works · 28.1% of its workMedicine: 4 fractional works · 24.0% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 6.5% of its workHealth Informatics: 1 fractional works · 6.5% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 9.6% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPharmaceutical Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKBrainAid (UnitedStates)16fractional works, all years
Life Sciences10%Physical Sciences34%Health Sciences28%Social Sciences29%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Computer Science321.5%
    2. Engineering17.5%
    3. Physics and Astronomy02.1%
    4. Materials Science01.7%
    5. Environmental Science00.7%
    1. Social Sciences213.9%
    2. Psychology211.7%
    3. Decision Sciences02.1%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.1%
    1. Medicine424.0%
    2. Health Professions14.1%
    1. Neuroscience14.2%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology02.9%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology02.1%
    4. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.51× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 1.06× its world share, 0 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 2.84× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 5.28× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 1.40× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 0.38× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.47× its world share, 2 worksMedicinePsychology: 1.97× its world share, 0 worksPsychology1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Computer Science, 5.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 10 fields, with their numbers
  1. Computer Science5.28×2 works
  2. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics2.84×0 works
  3. Psychology1.97×0 works
  4. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.51×0 works
  5. Medicine1.47×2 works
  6. Materials Science1.40×0 works
  7. Neuroscience1.06×0 works
  8. Engineering0.40×0 works
  9. Environmental Science0.40×0 works
  10. Health Professions0.38×0 works

What are the most cited papers from BrainAid (United States)?

The most cited paper from BrainAid (United States) is "The Planning and Execution Assistant and Trainer (PEAT)" (Richard M. Levinson, 1997), with 94 citations. Next come "Interactive activity recognition and prompting to assist people with cognitive disabilities" (47) and "Survey of Command Execution Systems for NASA Spacecraft and Robots" (22).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The Planning and Execution Assistant and Trainer (PEAT) Richard M. Levinson · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Apr 1997 94
2 Interactive activity recognition and prompting to assist people with cognitive disabilities Yi Chu, Young Chol Song, Richard M. Levinson et al. · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments Open access Sep 2012 47
3 Survey of Command Execution Systems for NASA Spacecraft and Robots Vandi Verma, Ari Jónsson, Reid G. Simmons et al. · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) Open access 2005 22
4 When did you start doing that thing that you do? interactive activity recognition and prompting Yi Chu, Young Chol Song, Henry Kautz et al. 2011 8
5 Atomoxetine monotherapy compared with combination therapy for the treatment of ADHD: a retrospective chart review study David B. Clemow, Oren Mason, Elias H. Sarkis et al. · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 21 Oct 2015 4
All 5 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does BrainAid (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Machine Learning in Healthcare, Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Topic Modeling and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging.

Machine Learning in Heal…1Machine Learning in Healthcare: 1 fractional worksArtificial Intelligence …1Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education: 1 fractional worksTopic Modeling: 0 fractional worksRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: 0 fractional worksSpeech and Audio Processing: 0 fractional worksEmotion and Mood Recogni…0Emotion and Mood Recognition: 0 fractional worksBiomedical Text Mining a…0Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies: 0 fractional worksSpeech Recognition and S…0Speech Recognition and Synthesis: 0 fractional worksExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): 0 fractional worksNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery: 0 fractional works
Artificial IntelligenceHealth InformaticsRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingSignal Processing3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Machine Learning in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence 1 works
  2. 2 Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Health Informatics 1 works
  3. 3 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  4. 4 Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
  5. 5 Speech and Audio Processing Signal Processing 0 works
  6. 6 Emotion and Mood Recognition Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works
  7. 7 Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies Molecular Biology 0 works
  8. 8 Speech Recognition and Synthesis Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  9. 9 Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Artificial Intelligence 0 works
  10. 10 Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Biomaterials 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available44.0%not open56.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors16.6%domestic only83.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has BrainAid (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 51% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is BrainAid (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000014% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%BrainAid (United States)0.000038% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of BrainAid (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Mountain View

All research institutions in Mountain View

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about BrainAid (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.