Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Government institution · London · United Kingdom

Central Electricity Generating Board

In research, Central Electricity Generating Board stands highest in Physical Sciences (#1,167 of 21,541 worldwide), Engineering (#1,036 of 11,412 worldwide) and Materials Science (#420 of 4,504 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#1,688
of 42,892
Rank in United Kingdom
#116
of 2,253
Research works
3.8k
▲ 124% vs 2013–17
Citations
82k
21.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.8%
record average 16.5%
Open access
3%
world 28%

What is Central Electricity Generating Board known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Physical SciencesDomain #1,167 of 21,541 21.8%3,527
EngineeringField #1,036 of 11,412 22.3%2,094
Materials ScienceField #420 of 4,504 24.6%619
Mechanical EngineeringSubfield #408 of 2,753 26.9%492
Materials ChemistrySubfield #496 of 3,068 24.5%484
Mechanics of MaterialsSubfield #332 of 1,561 25.6%292
Aerospace EngineeringSubfield #683 of 1,730 33.3%240
Environmental ScienceField #2,680 of 6,208 24.2%233
Electrical and Electronic EngineeringSubfield #1,961 of 4,248 12.1%371
Social SciencesDomain #8,146 of 16,945 12.7%137

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Central Electricity Generating Board sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Computer Science: 0.52× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 2.74× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 6.50× its world share, 1 worksEnergyEngineering: 3.93× its world share, 9 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 1.22× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.31× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 1.13× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.43× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsNursing: 4.38× its world share, 0 worksNursingBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.89× its world share, 1 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 2.41× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 0.01× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.18× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Energy, 6.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Central Electricity Generating Board?

Ranked on the composite score, Richard H. Taylor, Paul Tempest and G. C. Allen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Central Electricity Generating Board.

  1. 1 Richard H. Taylor United Kingdom · #98,415 worldwide 386 citations · 23 works
  2. 2 Paul Tempest United Kingdom · #146,806 worldwide 252 citations · 22 works
  3. 3 G. C. Allen United Kingdom · #196,185 worldwide 423 citations · 123 works
  4. 4 R. P. Skelton United Kingdom · #228,193 worldwide 165 citations · 29 works
  5. 5 John MacQueen United Kingdom · #236,800 worldwide 48 citations · 27 works
  6. 6 J.A. Turnbull United Kingdom · #402,867 worldwide 143 citations · 16 works
  7. 7 R. K. Wild United Kingdom · #407,903 worldwide 88 citations · 25 works
  8. 8 J.S. Forrest United Kingdom · #413,732 worldwide 33 citations · 25 works
  9. 9 Derek Midgley United Kingdom · #424,860 worldwide 66 citations · 20 works
  10. 10 B. Burton United Kingdom · #429,608 worldwide 99 citations · 26 works
All ranked researchers at Central Electricity Generating Board

Which keywords describe research at Central Electricity Generating Board?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, Hydrogen Embrittlement, Heat Transfer, Grain Refinement, Oxidation Resistance, Fatigue Crack Closure and Fracture Toughness Testing.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Microstructure243▲ 13×14 topics
  2. Mechanical Properties236▲ 6.6×35 topics
  3. Hydrogen Embrittlement183▲ 47×3 topics
  4. Renewable Energy139▲ 3.7×37 topics
  5. Climate Change138▲ 1.38×54 topics
  6. Heat Transfer138▲ 7.2×17 topics
  7. Grain Refinement124▲ 23×3 topics
  8. Oxidation Resistance120▲ 22×3 topics
  9. Fatigue Crack Closure117▲ 69×1 topic
  10. Fracture Toughness Testing117▲ 69×1 topic
  11. Energy Efficiency108▲ 3.6×28 topics
  12. Density Functional Theory108▲ 11×5 topics
  13. High Temperature Behavior108▲ 29×2 topics
  14. Microstructural Evolution105▲ 17×4 topics
  15. Accident Tolerant Fuels103▲ 55×1 topic
  16. Fuel Cladding103▲ 55×1 topic
  17. Phase Stability98▲ 56×2 topics
  18. High-Temperature Alloys97▲ 104×1 topic
  19. Superalloys97▲ 104×1 topic
  20. Grain Boundary Engineering95▲ 32×2 topics
  21. Large-Eddy Simulation91▲ 10×5 topics
  22. Oxidation Behavior90▲ 39×2 topics
  23. Thermal Properties82▲ 14×6 topics
  24. Thermal Conductivity81▲ 16×7 topics
  25. Finite Element Analysis78▲ 8.9×9 topics
  26. Air Quality77▲ 11×5 topics
  27. Smart Grid76▲ 7.0×8 topics
  28. CFD Simulation69▲ 15×5 topics
  29. Numerical Simulation68▲ 5.4×14 topics
  30. Molten Salt65▲ 37×1 topic
  31. Nuclear Reactor65▲ 37×1 topic
  32. Corrosion Behavior63▲ 19×2 topics
  33. Corrosion63▲ 14×6 topics
  34. Thermal Analysis60▲ 11×8 topics
  35. High-Strength Steels59▲ 34×1 topic
  36. Martensite Transformation59▲ 34×1 topic
  37. Turbulent Flow58▲ 12×4 topics
  38. Raman Spectroscopy57▲ 6.4×7 topics
  39. Pitting Corrosion52▲ 27×2 topics
  40. Defect Detection52▲ 13×3 topics

Which research topics does Central Electricity Generating Board publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Power Systems and Technologies, Microgrid Control and Optimization, Energy Load and Power Forecasting and Power System Optimization and Stability.

  1. 1 Power Systems and Technologies Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1 works
  2. 2 Microgrid Control and Optimization Control and Systems Engineering 1 works
  3. 3 Energy Load and Power Forecasting Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1 works
  4. 4 Power System Optimization and Stability Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1 works
  5. 5 Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission Control and Systems Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Coastal and Marine Dynamics Earth-Surface Processes 0 works
  7. 7 HVDC Systems and Fault Protection Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
  8. 8 Smart Grid Energy Management Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
  9. 9 Optimal Power Flow Distribution Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
  10. 10 Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems Energy Engineering and Power Technology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available3.0%not open97.0%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors5.3%domestic only94.7%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Central Electricity Generating Board's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 124% higher than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in London

All research institutions in London

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.