Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Stuttgart · Germany

Dialogik (Germany)

Research works
39
▼ 73% vs 2018-21
Citations
718
18.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
36%
world 40%
International
29%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Dialogik (Germany) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Dialogik (Germany) work in?

In all years, 57% of research at Dialogik (Germany) is in Social Sciences, 34% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (44%), Environmental Science (27%), Business, Management and Accounting (8%). It does 2.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 22 fractional works · 57.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 17 fractional works · 44.5% of its workSociology and Political Science: 13 fractional works · 33.1% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 2 fractional works · 5.2% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workCommunication: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3 fractional works · 7.5% of its workStrategy and Management: 2 fractional works · 4.1% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDecision Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.6% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 13 fractional works · 33.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 10 fractional works · 27.1% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 4 fractional works · 11.0% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 3 fractional works · 8.3% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGeneral Energy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 5.5% of its workFood Science: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmall Animals: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKDialogik(Germany)39fractional works, all years
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences34%Health Sciences3%Social Sciences57%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1744.5%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting37.5%
    3. Decision Sciences24.6%
    4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.3%
    5. Psychology00.2%
    1. Environmental Science1027.1%
    2. Engineering12.9%
    3. Computer Science12.0%
    4. Chemistry00.9%
    5. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.3%
    6. Energy00.3%
    7. Materials Science00.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences25.5%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.7%
    3. Neuroscience00.2%
    1. Health Professions01.3%
    2. Medicine01.1%
    3. Veterinary00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1.49× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Neuroscience: 1.16× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceEngineering: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 3.22× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.45× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksMedicineDecision Sciences: 2.52× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesSocial Sciences: 5.00× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 5.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 8 fields, with their numbers
  1. Social Sciences5.00×2 works
  2. Environmental Science3.22×1 works
  3. Decision Sciences2.52×0 works
  4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences1.49×0 works
  5. Neuroscience1.16×0 works
  6. Health Professions0.45×0 works
  7. Medicine0.25×0 works
  8. Engineering0.24×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Dialogik (Germany)?

Ranked on the quality score, Christina Benighaus, Gisela Wachinger and Marion Dreyer lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Dialogik (Germany).

  1. 1 Christina Benighaus Germany · #1,103,086 worldwide 785 citations · 35 works
  2. 2 Gisela Wachinger Germany · #1,708,144 worldwide 2.4k citations · 16 works
  3. 3 Marion Dreyer Germany · #1,851,127 worldwide 834 citations · 71 works
  4. 4 Rainer Kühn Germany · #2,446,432 worldwide 244 citations · 29 works
  5. 5 Ludger Benighaus Germany · #2,693,732 worldwide 260 citations · 18 works
  6. 6 Piet Sellke Germany · #2,765,518 worldwide 155 citations · 22 works
All ranked researchers at Dialogik (Germany)

What are the most cited papers from Dialogik (Germany)?

The most cited paper from Dialogik (Germany) is "Delphi studies in social and health sciences—Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study" (Marlen Niederberger, Julia Schifano, Stefanie Deckert et al., 2024), with 211 citations. Next come "Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazards: outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe" (174) and "The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and priorities" (163).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Delphi studies in social and health sciences—Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study Marlen Niederberger, Julia Schifano, Stefanie Deckert et al. · PLoS ONE Open access 26 Aug 2024 211
2 Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazards: outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe Christian Kuhlicke et al. · Environmental Science & Policy 25 Jun 2011 174
3 The quality of food risk management in Europe: Perspectives and priorities Julie R. Houghton, Gene Rowe, Lynn Jayne Frewer et al. · Food Policy Open access 27 Jun 2007 163
4 Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study Ellen van Kleef, Lynn Jayne Frewer, George Chryssochoidis et al. · Appetite Open access 12 Apr 2006 159
5 Perception of technological risk: insights from research and lessons for risk communication and management Ortwin Renn, Christina Benighaus · Journal of Risk Research 6 Nov 2012 156
All 91 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Dialogik (Germany)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Risk Perception, Food Safety, Communication, Public Health, Trust, Nuclear Power, Precautionary Principle and Renewable Energy.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Risk Perception8▲ 109×5 topics
  2. Food Safety7▲ 66×4 topics
  3. Communication6▲ 53×2 topics
  4. Public Health6▲ 11×3 topics
  5. Trust6▲ 56×2 topics
  6. Nuclear Power5▲ 493×1 topic
  7. Precautionary Principle5▲ 981×1 topic
  8. Renewable Energy5▲ 12×4 topics
  9. Public Perception4▲ 122×4 topics
  10. Climate Change3▲ 3.3×8 topics
  11. Climate Change Adaptation3▲ 73×2 topics
  12. Resilience3▲ 22×2 topics
  13. Social-Ecological Systems3▲ 72×2 topics
  14. Sustainability Transitions3▲ 414×2 topics
  15. Adaptive Governance2▲ 426×1 topic
  16. Policy Mixes2▲ 426×1 topic
  17. Environmental Attitudes2▲ 118×2 topics
  18. Sustainable Development2▲ 5.0×5 topics
  19. Governance2▲ 18×3 topics
  20. Global Warming2▲ 14×2 topics
  21. Sustainability Assessment2▲ 46×3 topics
  22. Social Acceptance2▲ 236×1 topic
  23. Wind Power2▲ 62×1 topic
  24. Complex Systems2▲ 29×2 topics
  25. Digitalization2▲ 38×2 topics
  26. Innovation2▲ 4.5×4 topics
  27. Media Coverage2▲ 206×1 topic
  28. Science Communication2▲ 67×1 topic
  29. Environmental Impact Assessment2▲ 72×1 topic
  30. Leadership2▲ 11×2 topics
  31. Social Impact Assessment2▲ 125×1 topic
  32. Interdisciplinary Research1▲ 44×3 topics
  33. Participation1▲ 34×1 topic
  34. Policy Change1▲ 200×1 topic
  35. Regulatory Agencies1▲ 115×2 topics
  36. Regulatory Capitalism1▲ 250×1 topic
  37. Self-Regulation1▲ 17×1 topic
  38. Urban Development1▲ 8.7×4 topics
  39. Environmental Risk Assessment1▲ 25×3 topics
  40. Smart Specialization1▲ 70×2 topics

Which research topics does Dialogik (Germany) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Risk Perception and Management, Genetically Modified Organisms Research, Sustainability and Climate Change Governance and Criminal Law and Policy.

  1. 1 Risk Perception and Management Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  2. 2 Genetically Modified Organisms Research Plant Science 0 works
  3. 3 Sustainability and Climate Change Governance Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  4. 4 Criminal Law and Policy Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  5. 5 German Security and Defense Policies Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  6. 6 Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  7. 7 Social Media and Politics Communication 0 works
  8. 8 Sociology and Education Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  9. 9 Environmental and Social Impact Assessments Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
  10. 10 Medical and Health Sciences Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available36.4%not open63.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors29.4%domestic only70.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Dialogik (Germany)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 73% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Dialogik (Germany) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000034% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Dialogik (Germany)0.0000075% in 202520102020

Fractional works of Dialogik (Germany) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Stuttgart

All research institutions in Stuttgart

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Dialogik (Germany). Posts are plain text and can be reported.